Newcommand that uncludes a foreach with unknown number of parameters
Sorry, but part of the code is in French. However, it won't matter because it's only the listed text
I currently have a new command named listerfe
that, combined with listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
, succesfully proceeds an unknown number of parameters to separe them with a ,
Now, I have this code:
% !TeX encoding = UTF-8
% !TeX spellcheck = fr_FR
documentclass[utf8]{article}
usepackage{tikz}
makeatletter
newcommand{foreachlinedo}[2]{foreach noeud in {listerfe#1} {draw[<-] (#2.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}}
newcommand{listerfe}[1]{#1listerfenextarg}
newcommand{listerfenextarg}{@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
newcommand{listerfegobblenextarg}[1]{,#1@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
definecolor{couleurbackintr}{HTML}{7F00FF}
definecolor{couleurtextintr}{HTML}{FFFFFF}
definecolor{couleurbackfonc}{HTML}{C780FF}
definecolor{couleurtext}{HTML}{000000}
definecolor{couleurbackextr}{HTML}{DDB3FF}
begin{figure}[htp]
centering
tikzset{
basic/.style={draw, rounded corners=2pt, thick, text width=8em, align=flush center, text=couleurtext, node distance=2em},
intrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackintr, text=couleurtextintr},
fonction/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackfonc},
extrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackextr}
}
begin{tikzpicture}
fontsize{8}{9} selectfont
% intrants
matrix[row sep=2em, column sep=2em] {
% 1re ligne
%TODO changer nom
node[intrant](forcutil){Force utilisée}; & node[fonction](instcapt){Installer capteur sous l'eau}; & & & node[extrant](captinst){Capteur installé}; \
% 2me ligne
node[intrant](defailla){Défaillance}; & node[fonction](detcdefa){Détecter défaillance}; & & node[fonction](genralrm){Générer alarme}; & node[extrant](alarme){Alarme}; \
node[intrant](poissons){Poissons}; & node[fonction](detecteu){Détecteur}; & node[fonction](photo){Photo}; & node[fonction](accudonn){Accumuler données}; & \
node[intrant](elecbatt){Électicité batterie}; & node[fonction](alimcapt){Alimenter capteur}; & & node[fonction](idenpois){Identifier poisson}; & \
node[intrant](tempreau){Température de l'eau}; & node[fonction](captteau){Capteur température eau}; & & node[fonction](archdonn){Archiver donnéees}; & node[extrant](donnarch){Données archivées}; \
node[intrant](tempintr){Température interne}; & node[fonction](capttcpt){Capteur température interne}; & & & \
node[intrant](confvolm){Configuration volume}; & node[fonction](confcapt){Configurer capteur}; & & & \
node[intrant](entrutil){Entrées utilisateurs}; & node[fonction](authutil){Authentifier utilisateur}; & node[fonction](accedonn){Accéder aux données}; & & \
};
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{Diagramme fonctionnel}
label{f:caf_diag_fonc}
end{figure}
end{document}
Without the foreachlinedo
, so without arrows, it looks like this:
Now, when I run this code, it tells me this:
Argument of XC@definec@lor has an extra }. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before XC@definec@lor was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before tikz@@scan@@no@calculator was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{figure}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
You can't use `end' in internal vertical mode. end{document}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
Missing } inserted. end{document}
Emergency stop.
Unused global option(s): [utf8]. % doesn't matter
I created foreachlinedo
because I don't want to create lots of foreach
, because there will be lots and lots of arrows combined inthe diagram.
How can I make it work?
macros foreach parameters
add a comment |
Sorry, but part of the code is in French. However, it won't matter because it's only the listed text
I currently have a new command named listerfe
that, combined with listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
, succesfully proceeds an unknown number of parameters to separe them with a ,
Now, I have this code:
% !TeX encoding = UTF-8
% !TeX spellcheck = fr_FR
documentclass[utf8]{article}
usepackage{tikz}
makeatletter
newcommand{foreachlinedo}[2]{foreach noeud in {listerfe#1} {draw[<-] (#2.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}}
newcommand{listerfe}[1]{#1listerfenextarg}
newcommand{listerfenextarg}{@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
newcommand{listerfegobblenextarg}[1]{,#1@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
definecolor{couleurbackintr}{HTML}{7F00FF}
definecolor{couleurtextintr}{HTML}{FFFFFF}
definecolor{couleurbackfonc}{HTML}{C780FF}
definecolor{couleurtext}{HTML}{000000}
definecolor{couleurbackextr}{HTML}{DDB3FF}
begin{figure}[htp]
centering
tikzset{
basic/.style={draw, rounded corners=2pt, thick, text width=8em, align=flush center, text=couleurtext, node distance=2em},
intrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackintr, text=couleurtextintr},
fonction/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackfonc},
extrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackextr}
}
begin{tikzpicture}
fontsize{8}{9} selectfont
% intrants
matrix[row sep=2em, column sep=2em] {
% 1re ligne
%TODO changer nom
node[intrant](forcutil){Force utilisée}; & node[fonction](instcapt){Installer capteur sous l'eau}; & & & node[extrant](captinst){Capteur installé}; \
% 2me ligne
node[intrant](defailla){Défaillance}; & node[fonction](detcdefa){Détecter défaillance}; & & node[fonction](genralrm){Générer alarme}; & node[extrant](alarme){Alarme}; \
node[intrant](poissons){Poissons}; & node[fonction](detecteu){Détecteur}; & node[fonction](photo){Photo}; & node[fonction](accudonn){Accumuler données}; & \
node[intrant](elecbatt){Électicité batterie}; & node[fonction](alimcapt){Alimenter capteur}; & & node[fonction](idenpois){Identifier poisson}; & \
node[intrant](tempreau){Température de l'eau}; & node[fonction](captteau){Capteur température eau}; & & node[fonction](archdonn){Archiver donnéees}; & node[extrant](donnarch){Données archivées}; \
node[intrant](tempintr){Température interne}; & node[fonction](capttcpt){Capteur température interne}; & & & \
node[intrant](confvolm){Configuration volume}; & node[fonction](confcapt){Configurer capteur}; & & & \
node[intrant](entrutil){Entrées utilisateurs}; & node[fonction](authutil){Authentifier utilisateur}; & node[fonction](accedonn){Accéder aux données}; & & \
};
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{Diagramme fonctionnel}
label{f:caf_diag_fonc}
end{figure}
end{document}
Without the foreachlinedo
, so without arrows, it looks like this:
Now, when I run this code, it tells me this:
Argument of XC@definec@lor has an extra }. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before XC@definec@lor was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before tikz@@scan@@no@calculator was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{figure}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
You can't use `end' in internal vertical mode. end{document}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
Missing } inserted. end{document}
Emergency stop.
Unused global option(s): [utf8]. % doesn't matter
I created foreachlinedo
because I don't want to create lots of foreach
, because there will be lots and lots of arrows combined inthe diagram.
How can I make it work?
macros foreach parameters
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to writeforeachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?
– marmot
28 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the lineforeachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it byforeach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the packagelistifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option[utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).
– quark67
37 secs ago
add a comment |
Sorry, but part of the code is in French. However, it won't matter because it's only the listed text
I currently have a new command named listerfe
that, combined with listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
, succesfully proceeds an unknown number of parameters to separe them with a ,
Now, I have this code:
% !TeX encoding = UTF-8
% !TeX spellcheck = fr_FR
documentclass[utf8]{article}
usepackage{tikz}
makeatletter
newcommand{foreachlinedo}[2]{foreach noeud in {listerfe#1} {draw[<-] (#2.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}}
newcommand{listerfe}[1]{#1listerfenextarg}
newcommand{listerfenextarg}{@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
newcommand{listerfegobblenextarg}[1]{,#1@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
definecolor{couleurbackintr}{HTML}{7F00FF}
definecolor{couleurtextintr}{HTML}{FFFFFF}
definecolor{couleurbackfonc}{HTML}{C780FF}
definecolor{couleurtext}{HTML}{000000}
definecolor{couleurbackextr}{HTML}{DDB3FF}
begin{figure}[htp]
centering
tikzset{
basic/.style={draw, rounded corners=2pt, thick, text width=8em, align=flush center, text=couleurtext, node distance=2em},
intrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackintr, text=couleurtextintr},
fonction/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackfonc},
extrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackextr}
}
begin{tikzpicture}
fontsize{8}{9} selectfont
% intrants
matrix[row sep=2em, column sep=2em] {
% 1re ligne
%TODO changer nom
node[intrant](forcutil){Force utilisée}; & node[fonction](instcapt){Installer capteur sous l'eau}; & & & node[extrant](captinst){Capteur installé}; \
% 2me ligne
node[intrant](defailla){Défaillance}; & node[fonction](detcdefa){Détecter défaillance}; & & node[fonction](genralrm){Générer alarme}; & node[extrant](alarme){Alarme}; \
node[intrant](poissons){Poissons}; & node[fonction](detecteu){Détecteur}; & node[fonction](photo){Photo}; & node[fonction](accudonn){Accumuler données}; & \
node[intrant](elecbatt){Électicité batterie}; & node[fonction](alimcapt){Alimenter capteur}; & & node[fonction](idenpois){Identifier poisson}; & \
node[intrant](tempreau){Température de l'eau}; & node[fonction](captteau){Capteur température eau}; & & node[fonction](archdonn){Archiver donnéees}; & node[extrant](donnarch){Données archivées}; \
node[intrant](tempintr){Température interne}; & node[fonction](capttcpt){Capteur température interne}; & & & \
node[intrant](confvolm){Configuration volume}; & node[fonction](confcapt){Configurer capteur}; & & & \
node[intrant](entrutil){Entrées utilisateurs}; & node[fonction](authutil){Authentifier utilisateur}; & node[fonction](accedonn){Accéder aux données}; & & \
};
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{Diagramme fonctionnel}
label{f:caf_diag_fonc}
end{figure}
end{document}
Without the foreachlinedo
, so without arrows, it looks like this:
Now, when I run this code, it tells me this:
Argument of XC@definec@lor has an extra }. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before XC@definec@lor was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before tikz@@scan@@no@calculator was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{figure}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
You can't use `end' in internal vertical mode. end{document}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
Missing } inserted. end{document}
Emergency stop.
Unused global option(s): [utf8]. % doesn't matter
I created foreachlinedo
because I don't want to create lots of foreach
, because there will be lots and lots of arrows combined inthe diagram.
How can I make it work?
macros foreach parameters
Sorry, but part of the code is in French. However, it won't matter because it's only the listed text
I currently have a new command named listerfe
that, combined with listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
, succesfully proceeds an unknown number of parameters to separe them with a ,
Now, I have this code:
% !TeX encoding = UTF-8
% !TeX spellcheck = fr_FR
documentclass[utf8]{article}
usepackage{tikz}
makeatletter
newcommand{foreachlinedo}[2]{foreach noeud in {listerfe#1} {draw[<-] (#2.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}}
newcommand{listerfe}[1]{#1listerfenextarg}
newcommand{listerfenextarg}{@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
newcommand{listerfegobblenextarg}[1]{,#1@ifnextcharbgroup{listerfegobblenextarg}{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
definecolor{couleurbackintr}{HTML}{7F00FF}
definecolor{couleurtextintr}{HTML}{FFFFFF}
definecolor{couleurbackfonc}{HTML}{C780FF}
definecolor{couleurtext}{HTML}{000000}
definecolor{couleurbackextr}{HTML}{DDB3FF}
begin{figure}[htp]
centering
tikzset{
basic/.style={draw, rounded corners=2pt, thick, text width=8em, align=flush center, text=couleurtext, node distance=2em},
intrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackintr, text=couleurtextintr},
fonction/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackfonc},
extrant/.style={basic, fill=couleurbackextr}
}
begin{tikzpicture}
fontsize{8}{9} selectfont
% intrants
matrix[row sep=2em, column sep=2em] {
% 1re ligne
%TODO changer nom
node[intrant](forcutil){Force utilisée}; & node[fonction](instcapt){Installer capteur sous l'eau}; & & & node[extrant](captinst){Capteur installé}; \
% 2me ligne
node[intrant](defailla){Défaillance}; & node[fonction](detcdefa){Détecter défaillance}; & & node[fonction](genralrm){Générer alarme}; & node[extrant](alarme){Alarme}; \
node[intrant](poissons){Poissons}; & node[fonction](detecteu){Détecteur}; & node[fonction](photo){Photo}; & node[fonction](accudonn){Accumuler données}; & \
node[intrant](elecbatt){Électicité batterie}; & node[fonction](alimcapt){Alimenter capteur}; & & node[fonction](idenpois){Identifier poisson}; & \
node[intrant](tempreau){Température de l'eau}; & node[fonction](captteau){Capteur température eau}; & & node[fonction](archdonn){Archiver donnéees}; & node[extrant](donnarch){Données archivées}; \
node[intrant](tempintr){Température interne}; & node[fonction](capttcpt){Capteur température interne}; & & & \
node[intrant](confvolm){Configuration volume}; & node[fonction](confcapt){Configurer capteur}; & & & \
node[intrant](entrutil){Entrées utilisateurs}; & node[fonction](authutil){Authentifier utilisateur}; & node[fonction](accedonn){Accéder aux données}; & & \
};
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{Diagramme fonctionnel}
label{f:caf_diag_fonc}
end{figure}
end{document}
Without the foreachlinedo
, so without arrows, it looks like this:
Now, when I run this code, it tells me this:
Argument of XC@definec@lor has an extra }. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before XC@definec@lor was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Paragraph ended before tikz@@scan@@no@calculator was complete. ...{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{tikzpicture}
Missing } inserted. end{tikzpicture}
Extra }, or forgotten endgroup. end{figure}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
You can't use `end' in internal vertical mode. end{document}
begin{figure} on input line 30 ended by end{document}. end{document}
Missing } inserted. end{document}
Emergency stop.
Unused global option(s): [utf8]. % doesn't matter
I created foreachlinedo
because I don't want to create lots of foreach
, because there will be lots and lots of arrows combined inthe diagram.
How can I make it work?
macros foreach parameters
macros foreach parameters
asked 1 hour ago
Vinccool96Vinccool96
1819
1819
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to writeforeachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?
– marmot
28 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the lineforeachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it byforeach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the packagelistifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option[utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).
– quark67
37 secs ago
add a comment |
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to writeforeachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?
– marmot
28 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the lineforeachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it byforeach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the packagelistifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option[utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).
– quark67
37 secs ago
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to write
foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?– marmot
28 mins ago
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to write
foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?– marmot
28 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the line
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it by foreach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the package listifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option [utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).– quark67
37 secs ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the line
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it by foreach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the package listifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option [utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).– quark67
37 secs ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I used foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
and scrapped listerfe
, listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480011%2fnewcommand-that-uncludes-a-foreach-with-unknown-number-of-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I used foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
and scrapped listerfe
, listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
add a comment |
I used foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
and scrapped listerfe
, listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
add a comment |
I used foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
and scrapped listerfe
, listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
I used foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
and scrapped listerfe
, listerfenextarg
and listerfegobblenextarg
answered 11 mins ago
Vinccool96Vinccool96
1819
1819
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480011%2fnewcommand-that-uncludes-a-foreach-with-unknown-number-of-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please don't get me wrong but all these efforts only because you do not want to write
foreachlinedo{forcutil,defailla,poissons}{instcapt};
, which would allow you to have a very simple loop? Do you think that is worth it?– marmot
28 mins ago
That can work. I'll try it. Edit: It works
– Vinccool96
14 mins ago
Can you better explain what you would do? If I comment the line
foreachlinedo{{forcutil}{defailla}{poissons}}{instcapt};
and replace it byforeach noeud in {forcutil,defailla,poissons} {draw[<-] (instcapt.east) -| ++(-1em,0em) |- (noeud.west);}
, the result seems ugly for the arrows. By the way, perhaps the packagelistifitems
can be useful for your task. And the global option[utf8]
is unused (warning in the log).– quark67
37 secs ago