1294

Multi tool use
SÉCULOS:
|
Século XII — Século XIII — Século XIV
|
DÉCADAS:
|
1240 • 1250 • 1260 • 1270 • 1280 • 1290 • 1300 • 1310 • 1320 • 1330 • 1340
|
ANOS:
|
1289 • 1290 • 1291 • 1292 • 1293 • 1294 • 1295 • 1296 • 1297 • 1298 • 1299
|
Outros projetos Wikimedia também contêm material sobre este tema:
|

|
Textos originais no Wikisource
|
1294 em outros calendários
Calendário gregoriano
|
1294 MCCXCIV
|
Ab urbe condita
|
2047
|
Calendário arménio
|
N/A
|
Calendário chinês
|
3990 – 3991
|
Calendário judaico
|
5054 – 5055
|
Calendários hindus - Vikram Samvat - Shaka Samvat - Kali Yuga
|
1349 – 1350 1216 – 1217 4395 – 4396
|
Calendário persa
|
672 – 673
|
Calendário islâmico
|
693 – 694
|
Calendário rúnico
|
1544
|
1294 (MCCXCIV, na numeração romana) foi um ano comum do século XIII do Calendário Juliano, da Era de Cristo, a sua letra dominical foi C (52 semanas), teve início a uma sexta-feira e terminou também a uma sexta-feira.
Ano completo
|
Ano comum com início à sexta-feira

|
Kublai Khan - Antigo Imperador da China, neto de Genghis Khan.
Por tema
Referências
O Commons possui uma categoria contendo imagens e outros ficheiros sobre 1294
pLMEp8VuJ7WKL z,gK Do gWW,JWf
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
0
I have written a function using curl to generate the token. I check whether the token exists; if not, then I execute the function, otherwise I skip this function and proceed to next. But I am not sure that it will work if a token is expired. Is there any command to identify the expired token and generates the new one by calling this function? #!/bin/ksh export V_TOKEN="gen_token_${V_DATE}.txt" #### Calling function to generate the token function callPOST { curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-url' -d 'grant_type=password&username=usr01&password=pwd...