JavaScript RegEx won't match with newline
I'm current making a simple application using NodeJS to translate input into a defined format. For this I'm using the following piece of JavaScript, where content
is the input.
content = content.replace(/(.+)n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
Using this, I would expect the code below
Message
======
Another Message
------
translate into
<div>Message</div>
<p>Another Message</p>
However, I get the same output as input (so nothing changed),
I tried it with both RegExr and WebStorm's RegEx tester, and both of those find a match. When I log the result of content.match(/(.+)n=+$/gm)
I get null
.
When I remove the n
from the RegEx and the input, it does seem to match, which has me think the n
is causing some kind of issue. However, I'm not aware of any issue this could be causing.
javascript node.js regex
add a comment |
I'm current making a simple application using NodeJS to translate input into a defined format. For this I'm using the following piece of JavaScript, where content
is the input.
content = content.replace(/(.+)n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
Using this, I would expect the code below
Message
======
Another Message
------
translate into
<div>Message</div>
<p>Another Message</p>
However, I get the same output as input (so nothing changed),
I tried it with both RegExr and WebStorm's RegEx tester, and both of those find a match. When I log the result of content.match(/(.+)n=+$/gm)
I get null
.
When I remove the n
from the RegEx and the input, it does seem to match, which has me think the n
is causing some kind of issue. However, I'm not aware of any issue this could be causing.
javascript node.js regex
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
add a comment |
I'm current making a simple application using NodeJS to translate input into a defined format. For this I'm using the following piece of JavaScript, where content
is the input.
content = content.replace(/(.+)n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
Using this, I would expect the code below
Message
======
Another Message
------
translate into
<div>Message</div>
<p>Another Message</p>
However, I get the same output as input (so nothing changed),
I tried it with both RegExr and WebStorm's RegEx tester, and both of those find a match. When I log the result of content.match(/(.+)n=+$/gm)
I get null
.
When I remove the n
from the RegEx and the input, it does seem to match, which has me think the n
is causing some kind of issue. However, I'm not aware of any issue this could be causing.
javascript node.js regex
I'm current making a simple application using NodeJS to translate input into a defined format. For this I'm using the following piece of JavaScript, where content
is the input.
content = content.replace(/(.+)n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
Using this, I would expect the code below
Message
======
Another Message
------
translate into
<div>Message</div>
<p>Another Message</p>
However, I get the same output as input (so nothing changed),
I tried it with both RegExr and WebStorm's RegEx tester, and both of those find a match. When I log the result of content.match(/(.+)n=+$/gm)
I get null
.
When I remove the n
from the RegEx and the input, it does seem to match, which has me think the n
is causing some kind of issue. However, I'm not aware of any issue this could be causing.
javascript node.js regex
javascript node.js regex
asked Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
InzeNLInzeNL
6717
6717
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
add a comment |
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
are you using windows?
give a try to:
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
depending on OS and browser you may get there n
or rn
(r
denotes carriage return, they may be other reasons for them to appear. But in your regex you should expect either n
or rn
Edit:
As suggested by Poul Bak you could simply add ?
after r
to handle both cases:
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53526378%2fjavascript-regex-wont-match-with-newline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
are you using windows?
give a try to:
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
depending on OS and browser you may get there n
or rn
(r
denotes carriage return, they may be other reasons for them to appear. But in your regex you should expect either n
or rn
Edit:
As suggested by Poul Bak you could simply add ?
after r
to handle both cases:
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
are you using windows?
give a try to:
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
depending on OS and browser you may get there n
or rn
(r
denotes carriage return, they may be other reasons for them to appear. But in your regex you should expect either n
or rn
Edit:
As suggested by Poul Bak you could simply add ?
after r
to handle both cases:
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
are you using windows?
give a try to:
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
depending on OS and browser you may get there n
or rn
(r
denotes carriage return, they may be other reasons for them to appear. But in your regex you should expect either n
or rn
Edit:
As suggested by Poul Bak you could simply add ?
after r
to handle both cases:
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
are you using windows?
give a try to:
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)rn-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
depending on OS and browser you may get there n
or rn
(r
denotes carriage return, they may be other reasons for them to appear. But in your regex you should expect either n
or rn
Edit:
As suggested by Poul Bak you could simply add ?
after r
to handle both cases:
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n=+$/gm, '<div>$1</div>');
content = content.replace(/(.+)r?n-+$/gm, '<p>$1</p>');
edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:35
answered Nov 28 '18 at 19:24
dfensdfens
3,48942547
3,48942547
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
2
2
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
Use: '/(.+)r?n=+$/gm' That makes the 'r' optional.
– Poul Bak
Nov 28 '18 at 19:29
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53526378%2fjavascript-regex-wont-match-with-newline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Works fine for me: jsfiddle.net/khrismuc/o92sa1mu
– Chris G
Nov 28 '18 at 19:07
^ same regexr.com/43ve3
– zfrisch
Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
There is nothing wrong with your javaScript code. You can test it here
– Alfredo A.
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17