Btukfyl

I know it is unorthodox but there's really no way to show what I have done other than the link.

I am writing my thesis using the PhD Thesis Template for Cambridge University Engineering Department (CUED) (v2.3.1) found on Overleaf at my tutor's request and I can't seem to be able to separate the references so that they are after each chapter.

I have tried using natbib with chapterbib as one question here suggested, I have tried using biblatex with refsection=chapter and nothing.

I don't know enough to understand the .cls or other documents that define the kind of document class I am using.

I am calling each reference in the chapter like

bibliographystyle{aipnum4-1.bst}

setstretch{0.9}

bibliography{ch1/biblio1.bib} 

I don't know what to do, I have read every question on here and cant seem to make it work.

Thanks!

Edit: Forgot to mention, even though I've tried different ways to get multiple references sections, at the moment I am using biblatex. The references for the first chapter are shown for all the rest of the chapters too, and the references that are not in the .bib of the first chapter are displayed like ?? in the rest of the thesis.

Edit2: A link to a minimal working example in overleaf is here. I know it's not ideal but I cant think of any other way.

If at all possible you should try to avoid templates in general and this template in particular. See Why should you avoid using (complex) templates?. Templates are fine while they are working and giving you exactly the output you want, but it can become increasingly complicated to modify them. Bad templates may contain outdated or outright wrong code and may explode into your face at any moment.

This particular template (Link to the Overleaf version) is also available on https://github.com/kks32/phd-thesis-template and is intended to be a PhD thesis template for Cambridge University Engineering Department (CUED). If that's not where you will be submitting your thesis, it is probably better not to use that template.

The class has several bibliography-related options and custombib would hand all control over the bibliography back to you if you had not also used the option numbered. The way these options are handled means that (counter-intuitively) the eralier option numbered just overrides the custombib and loads natbib instead. (Note that the class does not care about the order of these bibliography options, the outcome is determined by the particular nesting of tests in the implementation of the class. And the outcome of using conflicting options is not at all clear from the outside.)

In Preamble/preamble.tex, specifically with

ifuseCustomBib

%usepackage[backend=biber,refsection=section, style=numeric-comp, citestyle=numeric, sorting=nty]{biblatex}



usepackage[firstinits=true,

bibencoding=inputenc,

hyperref=auto,

pagination=none,

%style=standard,

refsection=chapter]

{biblatex}





bibliographystyle{aipnum4-1.bst}

fi

you try to explicitly load the biblatex package, yet in the next line of code you write

bibliographystyle{aipnum4-1.bst}

which is a command of traditional BibTeX bibliographies that is incompatible with biblatex (and also slightly incorrect: the style in bibliographystyle should be given without file extension, bibliographystyle{aipnum4-1} would be correct).

Be that as it may, the numbered option quashes your attempt to define the bibliography anyway. It just causes natbib to be loaded and ignores your definitions because they are guarded by ifuseCustomBib (which is false).

In the chapters (e.g. Chapter5/chapter5.tex) you then produce a bibliography with

I know this seems kind of extra, it's so that no extra white page is added in between the text and the references.

begingroup

makeatletter

renewcommand{chapter}{

    if@openrightclearpageelseclearpagefi

    thispagestyle{empty}%

    global@topnumz@

    @afterindentfalse

    secdef@chapter@schapter

}

makeatother



bibliographystyle{aipnum4-1.bst}

setstretch{0.9}

bibliography{Chapter5/biblio5.bib} 

endgroup

thispagestyle{empty}

clearpage

%if@openrightcleardoublepageelseclearpagefi

mbox{}

thispagestyle{empty}

which looks wrong on quite a few levels. But again we can take away from this bit of code that you are using traditional BibTeX methods and not biblatex – this time explicitly.

There are several methods to obtain split bibliographies (see Sectioning bibliography by type of referred item) and there are BibTeX-compatible way to obtain per-chapter bibliographies as well (see References at the end of each chapter and for example How to use chapterbib package: syntax and Bibliography in each chapter). Yet I believe that biblatex offers the easiest and most convenient way to per-chapter bibliographies.

Have a look at What to do to switch to biblatex? to see what you have to do to switch to biblatex.

Remove all the bibliographystyle and the bibliography instructions in the document body.

The following is a "minimal" example using PhDThesisPSnPDF that shows how you could use biblatex in your document. Please read the comments carefully, they should explain how this works.

% no option numbered

documentclass[a4paper,12pt,times,preprint,index, custombib]{Classes/PhDThesisPSnPDF}



% in Preamble/preamble.tex you need

ifuseCustomBib

usepackage[

  backend=biber,

  style=numeric,

  refsection=chapter]

{biblatex}



% you also need to declare your bib file

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

% biblatex-examples.bib is an example file

% that is available everywhere where biblatex is installed

% you'll need something like

% addbibresource{biblio.bib}

% and maybe

% addbibresource{Chapter5/biblio5.bib}

% etc. you can several of these lines

fi



begin{document}

% in your chapters you'll have

chapter{Lorem}

Lorem ipsum~cite{sigfridsson} dolor~cite{worman}.

% just use cite as normal



printbibliography[heading=subbibliography] % this prints the bibliography



% next chapter

chapter{Dolor}

Dolor~cite{nussbaum} sit~cite{sigfridsson}



printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]

end{document}