Confused by `object` type?












0














I am trying to come up with a type signature for a function parameter that itself is a function with a single parameter of type any object. Like this (typescript playground):



enter image description here



But in the strict compiler mode I am getting this error:



Argument of type '(a: { n: number; }) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(a: object) => void'.
Types of parameters 'a' and 'a' are incompatible.
Type 'object' is not assignable to type '{ n: number; }'.
Property 'n' is missing in type '{}'.


What am I doing wrong?



Thanks!










share|improve this question



























    0














    I am trying to come up with a type signature for a function parameter that itself is a function with a single parameter of type any object. Like this (typescript playground):



    enter image description here



    But in the strict compiler mode I am getting this error:



    Argument of type '(a: { n: number; }) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(a: object) => void'.
    Types of parameters 'a' and 'a' are incompatible.
    Type 'object' is not assignable to type '{ n: number; }'.
    Property 'n' is missing in type '{}'.


    What am I doing wrong?



    Thanks!










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am trying to come up with a type signature for a function parameter that itself is a function with a single parameter of type any object. Like this (typescript playground):



      enter image description here



      But in the strict compiler mode I am getting this error:



      Argument of type '(a: { n: number; }) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(a: object) => void'.
      Types of parameters 'a' and 'a' are incompatible.
      Type 'object' is not assignable to type '{ n: number; }'.
      Property 'n' is missing in type '{}'.


      What am I doing wrong?



      Thanks!










      share|improve this question













      I am trying to come up with a type signature for a function parameter that itself is a function with a single parameter of type any object. Like this (typescript playground):



      enter image description here



      But in the strict compiler mode I am getting this error:



      Argument of type '(a: { n: number; }) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(a: object) => void'.
      Types of parameters 'a' and 'a' are incompatible.
      Type 'object' is not assignable to type '{ n: number; }'.
      Property 'n' is missing in type '{}'.


      What am I doing wrong?



      Thanks!







      typescript typescript-typings






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 23 '18 at 22:40









      artemaveartemave

      3,37353862




      3,37353862
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          bbb expects a function that can be called with any object as argument.



          You're passing aaa as argument. But aaa can only be called with objects which have a property n of type number. It can't be called with any kind of object. So it's not a valid argument for bbb.



          To make an analogy, bbb is like a juice bar, which needs a fruit juicer to work, i.e. a function that can take any fruit and tranform it to juice.



          If you try to create a juice bar with an apple juicer (i.e. a function that can only make juice out of apples), that won't work well.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:41










          • Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
            – JB Nizet
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:52






          • 1




            Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
            – Cerberus
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:10










          • That works, thanks!
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:36










          • However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:37













          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53453593%2fconfused-by-object-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          bbb expects a function that can be called with any object as argument.



          You're passing aaa as argument. But aaa can only be called with objects which have a property n of type number. It can't be called with any kind of object. So it's not a valid argument for bbb.



          To make an analogy, bbb is like a juice bar, which needs a fruit juicer to work, i.e. a function that can take any fruit and tranform it to juice.



          If you try to create a juice bar with an apple juicer (i.e. a function that can only make juice out of apples), that won't work well.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:41










          • Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
            – JB Nizet
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:52






          • 1




            Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
            – Cerberus
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:10










          • That works, thanks!
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:36










          • However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:37


















          2














          bbb expects a function that can be called with any object as argument.



          You're passing aaa as argument. But aaa can only be called with objects which have a property n of type number. It can't be called with any kind of object. So it's not a valid argument for bbb.



          To make an analogy, bbb is like a juice bar, which needs a fruit juicer to work, i.e. a function that can take any fruit and tranform it to juice.



          If you try to create a juice bar with an apple juicer (i.e. a function that can only make juice out of apples), that won't work well.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:41










          • Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
            – JB Nizet
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:52






          • 1




            Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
            – Cerberus
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:10










          • That works, thanks!
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:36










          • However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:37
















          2












          2








          2






          bbb expects a function that can be called with any object as argument.



          You're passing aaa as argument. But aaa can only be called with objects which have a property n of type number. It can't be called with any kind of object. So it's not a valid argument for bbb.



          To make an analogy, bbb is like a juice bar, which needs a fruit juicer to work, i.e. a function that can take any fruit and tranform it to juice.



          If you try to create a juice bar with an apple juicer (i.e. a function that can only make juice out of apples), that won't work well.






          share|improve this answer














          bbb expects a function that can be called with any object as argument.



          You're passing aaa as argument. But aaa can only be called with objects which have a property n of type number. It can't be called with any kind of object. So it's not a valid argument for bbb.



          To make an analogy, bbb is like a juice bar, which needs a fruit juicer to work, i.e. a function that can take any fruit and tranform it to juice.



          If you try to create a juice bar with an apple juicer (i.e. a function that can only make juice out of apples), that won't work well.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 '18 at 23:06

























          answered Nov 23 '18 at 22:48









          JB NizetJB Nizet

          536k52864997




          536k52864997












          • Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:41










          • Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
            – JB Nizet
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:52






          • 1




            Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
            – Cerberus
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:10










          • That works, thanks!
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:36










          • However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:37




















          • Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:41










          • Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
            – JB Nizet
            Nov 24 '18 at 10:52






          • 1




            Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
            – Cerberus
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:10










          • That works, thanks!
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:36










          • However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
            – artemave
            Nov 24 '18 at 11:37


















          Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 10:41




          Thanks, that makes sense! So what is the correct way to express "accept a function with a single parameter of any object"?
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 10:41












          Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
          – JB Nizet
          Nov 24 '18 at 10:52




          Not sure what you exactly mean, but I guess you want function bbb(fn: (a: any) => void)
          – JB Nizet
          Nov 24 '18 at 10:52




          1




          1




          Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
          – Cerberus
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:10




          Perhaps it will be a bit better to go generic: function bbb<T extends object>(fn: (a: T) => void) - can't test it right now, though.
          – Cerberus
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:10












          That works, thanks!
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:36




          That works, thanks!
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:36












          However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:37






          However, if I turn it to this I am still getting the same error type Fn = <T extends object>(a: T) => void; function ccc(fn: Fn) { }; ccc(aaa)
          – artemave
          Nov 24 '18 at 11:37




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53453593%2fconfused-by-object-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lallio

          Unable to find Lightning Node

          Futebolista