Double checkmark symbol
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:

rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
add a comment |
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:

rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
add a comment |
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:

rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:

rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
stacking-symbols
asked Nov 27 '18 at 2:18
Rakshit KothariRakshit Kothari
333
333
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Rather than checkmark from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:

Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
add a comment |
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}

2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461926%2fdouble-checkmark-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Rather than checkmark from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:

Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
add a comment |
Rather than checkmark from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:

Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
add a comment |
Rather than checkmark from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:

Rather than checkmark from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:

edited Nov 27 '18 at 19:45
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:29
AndrewAndrew
30.7k34481
30.7k34481
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
add a comment |
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:02
add a comment |
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}

2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
add a comment |
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}

2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
add a comment |
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}

Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}

answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:49
marmotmarmot
102k4121231
102k4121231
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
add a comment |
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
2
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 '18 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 '18 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 '18 at 5:34
1
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 '18 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 '18 at 13:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461926%2fdouble-checkmark-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown