Bulgária do Volga

Multi tool use
História da Rússia
|
[[Imagem:|center|border|150px]]
|
Eslavos orientais
|
Cazares
|
Rússia de Quieve
|
Principado de Vladimir-Susdália
|
Bulgária do Volga
|
Invasão Mongol
|
Canato da Horda Dourada
|
Grão-Principado de Moscou
|
Canato de Cazã
|
Czarado da Rússia
|
Opríchnina
|
Império Russo
|
Revolução de 1905
|
Revolução de 1917
|
Revolução de Fevereiro
|
Revolução de Outubro
|
Guerra Civil
|
União Soviética
|
Era Stalin
|
Era Khrushchov
|
Era da Estagnação
|
Corrida espacial
|
Perestroika e Glasnost
|
Federação da Rússia
|
edite esta caixa
|
Bulgária do Volga ou Bulgária Volgaica ou Volga-Cama Bolgar foi um estado histórico que existiu entre os séculos VII e XIII ao redor da confluência dos rios Volga e Kama no local hoje abrangido pela Rússia. Atualmente, são consideradas descendentes da Bulgária do Volga em termos territoriais e étnicos as Repúblicas do Tartaristão e Chuváchia.
O Commons possui uma categoria contendo imagens e outros ficheiros sobre Bulgária do Volga
jNprihbV1ErSuYWcS 7jFpo2oOBMZb,zVDjbYE4Fehv1 2r2OBgeTT3MKknx7PthsiF HvB4VKDF4A8z
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
0
I have written a function using curl to generate the token. I check whether the token exists; if not, then I execute the function, otherwise I skip this function and proceed to next. But I am not sure that it will work if a token is expired. Is there any command to identify the expired token and generates the new one by calling this function? #!/bin/ksh export V_TOKEN="gen_token_${V_DATE}.txt" #### Calling function to generate the token function callPOST { curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-url' -d 'grant_type=password&username=usr01&password=pwd...