What are good sites to find citations in BibTex format?
When working with Bibtex, manually transferring the citation information for articles, prooceedings, books, etc. can be a tedious work. Some web sites provide citations in Bibtex format. What are your favorite sites to get Bibtex citations of your used references?
bibtex
|
show 2 more comments
When working with Bibtex, manually transferring the citation information for articles, prooceedings, books, etc. can be a tedious work. Some web sites provide citations in Bibtex format. What are your favorite sites to get Bibtex citations of your used references?
bibtex
1
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
4
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
1
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
|
show 2 more comments
When working with Bibtex, manually transferring the citation information for articles, prooceedings, books, etc. can be a tedious work. Some web sites provide citations in Bibtex format. What are your favorite sites to get Bibtex citations of your used references?
bibtex
When working with Bibtex, manually transferring the citation information for articles, prooceedings, books, etc. can be a tedious work. Some web sites provide citations in Bibtex format. What are your favorite sites to get Bibtex citations of your used references?
bibtex
bibtex
edited Dec 10 '10 at 16:10
lockstep
190k52585719
190k52585719
asked Jul 26 '10 at 20:43
Nils SchmidtNils Schmidt
1,22331213
1,22331213
1
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
4
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
1
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
|
show 2 more comments
1
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
4
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
1
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
1
1
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
4
4
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
1
1
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
|
show 2 more comments
25 Answers
25
active
oldest
votes
Here's my compilation of the suggestions given. Feel free to edit other suggestions in as appropriate, in addition to posting each suggestion in a separate answer. Note that this list is manually updated, and may not include all the other answers that have been posted! If you find some other answer helpful, please upvote it as well.
General-purpose reference collections that provide BibTeX citations
- Google Scholar
- CiteULike
- Amazon
- Nelson Beebe's collection
- Bibsonomy
Subject-specific collections that provide BibTeX citations
MathSciNet (math) (Freely available via MRef)
ACM catalog (CS)
IEEE catalog (engineering/technical)
Collection of CS Bibliographies (computer science)
DBLP (math/CS)
SPIRES (high-energy physics)- Citing Wikipedia itself
TeXMed, of PubMed (medicine, biology, bioinformatics)
PhilPapers (philosophy, related disciplines)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as it says on the tin)
Astrophysics Data System (astronomy and physics)
Ideas/RePEc (economics)
Reference managers that allow BibTeX export/import
Bibliophile for converting from other formats- JabRef
- Mendeley
Qiqqa - has a 'BibTeX Sniffer' wizard and auto-association of BibTeX with PDFs
Zotero (Firefox extension)
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+biblatex+biber+ text editor that supportsbiber( I use TexStudio) here.
– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: clickCite-BibTeX.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
|
show 1 more comment
MathSciNet a subscription only service (but available on most university campuses) provides BIBTEX entries for the entire mathematical literature.
A nice aspect of their interface is a "clipboard", to which you can save articles, then ask for the BIBTEX for everything on your clipboard all at once.
Mathematicians might also be interested in the shell scripts I wrote that automatically look up BIBTEX entries from MathSciNet, based on missing references in your .aux files.
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the toolbibgetto programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.
– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
add a comment |
For books I usually use a site, where it is possible to get Bibtex citations from Amazon.com articles. This is very good for books, and some inproceedings and incollections might be found here as well.
Amazon: http://lead.to/amazon/en/
As a Software Engineer I quite often have to deal with technical papers from ACM or IEEE. Both their catalogs provide Bibtex export capabilities.
ACM: http://portal.acm.org
IEEE: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
add a comment |
If you use Firefox and the wonderful extension Zotero, it can generally parse citation information from any webpage, and export a BibTeX-style citation from it.
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
add a comment |
Mendeley allows you to sync your collection with a bibtex file.
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
add a comment |
Since it hasn't appeared in the other answers, Google Scholar also allows you to download a BibTeX citation for each of its search results. You have to enable the feature from the Preferences page, though.
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
add a comment |
I maintain my Bibtex database manually (using JabRef as a GUI).
In particular with conference proceedings, it's not possible to find everything that you need in one service, and if you copy & paste information from different services, your bibliography won't be internally consistent. And even if you copy Bibtex entries directly from the publisher's site (e.g., ACM and IEEE services mentioned in other answers), you will get a lot of garbage. Details such as accented characters in authors' names, math in titles, etc., are very often wrong.
MathSciNet is one of the very few sites that I actually trust so much that I usually copy & paste Bibtex entries almost verbatim. DBLP is useful but I nevertheless double-check the information that I get from it.
It's a lot of work initially, but as your Bibtex database grows, you will be able to reuse more and more entries in your new articles - especially as you don't need to check your bibliography again when you are preparing the final versions of your papers. Using Bibtex macros and/or cross-references helps a lot with the manual work.
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
add a comment |
DBLP has good BibTeX entries for much of computer science. Their coverage is not comprehensive, and they have some awkward gaps pre-2000, but it is one of my favourite sources.
Edit, five years later: DBLP is still a mainstay of my bibliography needs, and now covers 3 million papers, including nearly all papers in the bit of theoretical computer science I am interested in, as well as much of discrete mathematics. It now also includes citations for ECCC and arXiv papers (although these really should not be of type article with the repository as the journal).
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
add a comment |
Another possibility is doi2bib.org which generates BibTeX citations from digital object identifiers (DOI), available for most (recent) publications.
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code]( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )
– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
add a comment |
If, through some peculiar combination of circumstances, you find yourself citing a Wikipedia article, the "cite this page" item under the "toolbox" in the left-hand sidebar provides BibTeX information. For example, to cite what is now the current version of the Isaac Newton article, one clicks "cite this page" and receives
@misc{ wiki:xxx,
author = "Wikipedia",
title = "Isaac Newton --- Wikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
year = "2010",
url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&oldid=374986805}",
note = "[Online; accessed 26-July-2010]"
}
The URL in this block includes a reference to the specific version number, so even if the article is changed later, the version being referenced can be retrieved.
add a comment |
I use http://www.citeulike.org/ Briliant cite with loads of references and it is a bit of "social" referencing. You can create, import, export collections as bibtex and manage all of them online. It is pre-populated with loads of sources (I personally care only about IEEE which they pre-import via links.)
With this website the reference entry are by far the largest I saw including multiple web-view & purches links, full abstracts and customisable keys. Stopped writting bibtex files by-hand long time ago.
add a comment |
A few people have already mentioned MathSciNet (and noted that it is subscription only). The same BibTeX data are freely available from the AMS via MRef.
add a comment |
http://www.bibtexsearch.com/ offers a simple search interface to millions of BibTeX records.
add a comment |
The Spires database of high energy particle and astrophysics papers can display its results in Bibtex format.
They also have some tools to help update bibliography lists.
add a comment |
For computer science the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies is very useful.
add a comment |
Slightly orthogonal to the actual question, but hopefully useful to anyone interested in the answers to it, there are libraries that convert from one format to another and these can often be more useful than finding a website that exports them in exactly the right format.
For example, for PHP then bibliophile has a library for converting to and from BibTeX. This is used by programs such as refbase for exporting references in BibTeX format.
Indeed, rather than a piecemeal approach, I would recommend using a reference program which can import and export to several formats (including BibTeX). Some have been mentioned in the answers above already.
add a comment |
I use BibSonomy to find and share Bibtex records. You may not find everything there, but with more and more users this should improve in time.
add a comment |
Unfortunately, the largest source of medical, biological and bioinformatical papers, PubMed, doesn’t offer a BibTeX export (yet?).
As a workaround, there is the service TeXMed that transforms the numeric PubMed identifiers to BibTeX citations. It’s not very usable but still it’s better than nothing.
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
add a comment |
Many scientific journals have readily available bibtex references available on their websites.
Here is a random one I found on ACM for instance:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1291536&jmp=cit&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=96100051&CFTOKEN=92185154#
add a comment |
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet: Nelson Beebe maintains an extensive database of references for mathematics and computer science.
add a comment |
Recently I found a website which gives bibtex by isbn numbers.
ottobib
add a comment |
Use this site:
PubTransformer
to transform any pubmed paper into bibtex and other formats such as: ADS, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.
add a comment |
In my experience Jabref doesn't handle certain characters well, and there's always quite a bit of manual fixing involved when someone uses it to translate some other format to bib format. Endnote comes to mind.
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
add a comment |
For the past few months I have been using bibtex-search which is a great little node.js program written or maintained by ekmartin that you use in the CLI/terminal. All that you need to do is open up the terminal and enter bibtex-search -source google followed by the title of work being sought and the last name of the author. It will return the bibtex source and copy this to your clipboard for you! so that all you need to do is paste it into your bib file. I use jabref with Docear so I do not necessarily paste the clipboard contents into my bib file; but I could if I wanted to.
Installation
Assuming that you already have node.js installed...
$ npm install --global bibtex-search
Usage
$ bibtex-search <query>
Options:
--source, -s Where to find papers from (default: acm) - valid options: [acm, ieee, google]
Examples:
$ bibtex-search bayou
$ bibtex-search --source google zaharia spark
add a comment |
Qiqqa.com helps you quickly and semiautomatically associate bibtex with your PDFs. You can then export a .bib file of all your references for use with latex/bibtex.
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143%2fwhat-are-good-sites-to-find-citations-in-bibtex-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
25 Answers
25
active
oldest
votes
25 Answers
25
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here's my compilation of the suggestions given. Feel free to edit other suggestions in as appropriate, in addition to posting each suggestion in a separate answer. Note that this list is manually updated, and may not include all the other answers that have been posted! If you find some other answer helpful, please upvote it as well.
General-purpose reference collections that provide BibTeX citations
- Google Scholar
- CiteULike
- Amazon
- Nelson Beebe's collection
- Bibsonomy
Subject-specific collections that provide BibTeX citations
MathSciNet (math) (Freely available via MRef)
ACM catalog (CS)
IEEE catalog (engineering/technical)
Collection of CS Bibliographies (computer science)
DBLP (math/CS)
SPIRES (high-energy physics)- Citing Wikipedia itself
TeXMed, of PubMed (medicine, biology, bioinformatics)
PhilPapers (philosophy, related disciplines)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as it says on the tin)
Astrophysics Data System (astronomy and physics)
Ideas/RePEc (economics)
Reference managers that allow BibTeX export/import
Bibliophile for converting from other formats- JabRef
- Mendeley
Qiqqa - has a 'BibTeX Sniffer' wizard and auto-association of BibTeX with PDFs
Zotero (Firefox extension)
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+biblatex+biber+ text editor that supportsbiber( I use TexStudio) here.
– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: clickCite-BibTeX.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
|
show 1 more comment
Here's my compilation of the suggestions given. Feel free to edit other suggestions in as appropriate, in addition to posting each suggestion in a separate answer. Note that this list is manually updated, and may not include all the other answers that have been posted! If you find some other answer helpful, please upvote it as well.
General-purpose reference collections that provide BibTeX citations
- Google Scholar
- CiteULike
- Amazon
- Nelson Beebe's collection
- Bibsonomy
Subject-specific collections that provide BibTeX citations
MathSciNet (math) (Freely available via MRef)
ACM catalog (CS)
IEEE catalog (engineering/technical)
Collection of CS Bibliographies (computer science)
DBLP (math/CS)
SPIRES (high-energy physics)- Citing Wikipedia itself
TeXMed, of PubMed (medicine, biology, bioinformatics)
PhilPapers (philosophy, related disciplines)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as it says on the tin)
Astrophysics Data System (astronomy and physics)
Ideas/RePEc (economics)
Reference managers that allow BibTeX export/import
Bibliophile for converting from other formats- JabRef
- Mendeley
Qiqqa - has a 'BibTeX Sniffer' wizard and auto-association of BibTeX with PDFs
Zotero (Firefox extension)
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+biblatex+biber+ text editor that supportsbiber( I use TexStudio) here.
– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: clickCite-BibTeX.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
|
show 1 more comment
Here's my compilation of the suggestions given. Feel free to edit other suggestions in as appropriate, in addition to posting each suggestion in a separate answer. Note that this list is manually updated, and may not include all the other answers that have been posted! If you find some other answer helpful, please upvote it as well.
General-purpose reference collections that provide BibTeX citations
- Google Scholar
- CiteULike
- Amazon
- Nelson Beebe's collection
- Bibsonomy
Subject-specific collections that provide BibTeX citations
MathSciNet (math) (Freely available via MRef)
ACM catalog (CS)
IEEE catalog (engineering/technical)
Collection of CS Bibliographies (computer science)
DBLP (math/CS)
SPIRES (high-energy physics)- Citing Wikipedia itself
TeXMed, of PubMed (medicine, biology, bioinformatics)
PhilPapers (philosophy, related disciplines)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as it says on the tin)
Astrophysics Data System (astronomy and physics)
Ideas/RePEc (economics)
Reference managers that allow BibTeX export/import
Bibliophile for converting from other formats- JabRef
- Mendeley
Qiqqa - has a 'BibTeX Sniffer' wizard and auto-association of BibTeX with PDFs
Zotero (Firefox extension)
Here's my compilation of the suggestions given. Feel free to edit other suggestions in as appropriate, in addition to posting each suggestion in a separate answer. Note that this list is manually updated, and may not include all the other answers that have been posted! If you find some other answer helpful, please upvote it as well.
General-purpose reference collections that provide BibTeX citations
- Google Scholar
- CiteULike
- Amazon
- Nelson Beebe's collection
- Bibsonomy
Subject-specific collections that provide BibTeX citations
MathSciNet (math) (Freely available via MRef)
ACM catalog (CS)
IEEE catalog (engineering/technical)
Collection of CS Bibliographies (computer science)
DBLP (math/CS)
SPIRES (high-energy physics)- Citing Wikipedia itself
TeXMed, of PubMed (medicine, biology, bioinformatics)
PhilPapers (philosophy, related disciplines)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as it says on the tin)
Astrophysics Data System (astronomy and physics)
Ideas/RePEc (economics)
Reference managers that allow BibTeX export/import
Bibliophile for converting from other formats- JabRef
- Mendeley
Qiqqa - has a 'BibTeX Sniffer' wizard and auto-association of BibTeX with PDFs
Zotero (Firefox extension)
edited Aug 16 '18 at 14:50
community wiki
11 revs, 6 users 48%
David Z
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+biblatex+biber+ text editor that supportsbiber( I use TexStudio) here.
– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: clickCite-BibTeX.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
|
show 1 more comment
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+biblatex+biber+ text editor that supportsbiber( I use TexStudio) here.
– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: clickCite-BibTeX.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
I just edited the list to incorporate a few more answers. This list can easily get out of date, and good answers can get lost, if someone doesn't babysit this list and update it each time an answer is posted. :-(
– ShreevatsaR
Aug 4 '10 at 3:24
2
2
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
In Google Scholar you need to go to "Scholar Preferences" and select the option "Show links to import citations into Bibtex".
– Alejandro
Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+
biblatex+biber+ text editor that supports biber ( I use TexStudio) here.– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
@David, +1 for the nice compilation and zotero recommendation, you may have a look at this automated workflow to get the job done investing in zotero+
biblatex+biber+ text editor that supports biber ( I use TexStudio) here.– doctorate
May 20 '13 at 13:09
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
Is there a rhyme or reason to the list of subject-specific sites? I tried to add one in alphabetical order but got too confused and gave up.
– cfr
Jan 20 '15 at 3:21
1
1
Alternative in Google Scholar: click
Cite - BibTeX.– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
Alternative in Google Scholar: click
Cite - BibTeX.– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:35
|
show 1 more comment
MathSciNet a subscription only service (but available on most university campuses) provides BIBTEX entries for the entire mathematical literature.
A nice aspect of their interface is a "clipboard", to which you can save articles, then ask for the BIBTEX for everything on your clipboard all at once.
Mathematicians might also be interested in the shell scripts I wrote that automatically look up BIBTEX entries from MathSciNet, based on missing references in your .aux files.
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the toolbibgetto programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.
– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
add a comment |
MathSciNet a subscription only service (but available on most university campuses) provides BIBTEX entries for the entire mathematical literature.
A nice aspect of their interface is a "clipboard", to which you can save articles, then ask for the BIBTEX for everything on your clipboard all at once.
Mathematicians might also be interested in the shell scripts I wrote that automatically look up BIBTEX entries from MathSciNet, based on missing references in your .aux files.
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the toolbibgetto programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.
– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
add a comment |
MathSciNet a subscription only service (but available on most university campuses) provides BIBTEX entries for the entire mathematical literature.
A nice aspect of their interface is a "clipboard", to which you can save articles, then ask for the BIBTEX for everything on your clipboard all at once.
Mathematicians might also be interested in the shell scripts I wrote that automatically look up BIBTEX entries from MathSciNet, based on missing references in your .aux files.
MathSciNet a subscription only service (but available on most university campuses) provides BIBTEX entries for the entire mathematical literature.
A nice aspect of their interface is a "clipboard", to which you can save articles, then ask for the BIBTEX for everything on your clipboard all at once.
Mathematicians might also be interested in the shell scripts I wrote that automatically look up BIBTEX entries from MathSciNet, based on missing references in your .aux files.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:50
Scott MorrisonScott Morrison
3,88052730
3,88052730
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the toolbibgetto programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.
– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
add a comment |
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the toolbibgetto programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.
– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
2
2
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
Also good to mention: the quality of the data is really good, with e.g. updates to old articles with DOI and URL entries.
– Jaap Eldering
Jul 20 '15 at 16:22
1
1
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the tool
bibget to programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
See also the recent AMS blog post <blogs.ams.org/beyondreviews/2015/07/11/references-and-citations> explaining the use of the tool
bibget to programmatically retrieve BIBTEX data from MathSciNet.– Scott Morrison
Jul 20 '15 at 23:30
add a comment |
For books I usually use a site, where it is possible to get Bibtex citations from Amazon.com articles. This is very good for books, and some inproceedings and incollections might be found here as well.
Amazon: http://lead.to/amazon/en/
As a Software Engineer I quite often have to deal with technical papers from ACM or IEEE. Both their catalogs provide Bibtex export capabilities.
ACM: http://portal.acm.org
IEEE: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
add a comment |
For books I usually use a site, where it is possible to get Bibtex citations from Amazon.com articles. This is very good for books, and some inproceedings and incollections might be found here as well.
Amazon: http://lead.to/amazon/en/
As a Software Engineer I quite often have to deal with technical papers from ACM or IEEE. Both their catalogs provide Bibtex export capabilities.
ACM: http://portal.acm.org
IEEE: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
add a comment |
For books I usually use a site, where it is possible to get Bibtex citations from Amazon.com articles. This is very good for books, and some inproceedings and incollections might be found here as well.
Amazon: http://lead.to/amazon/en/
As a Software Engineer I quite often have to deal with technical papers from ACM or IEEE. Both their catalogs provide Bibtex export capabilities.
ACM: http://portal.acm.org
IEEE: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
For books I usually use a site, where it is possible to get Bibtex citations from Amazon.com articles. This is very good for books, and some inproceedings and incollections might be found here as well.
Amazon: http://lead.to/amazon/en/
As a Software Engineer I quite often have to deal with technical papers from ACM or IEEE. Both their catalogs provide Bibtex export capabilities.
ACM: http://portal.acm.org
IEEE: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:49
Nils SchmidtNils Schmidt
1,22331213
1,22331213
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
add a comment |
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
The ACM Portal provides highly accurate BibTeX entries. It does occasionally lose LNCS volume numbers, and DOIs/URLs are sometimes left out, but these are minor problems.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:59
add a comment |
If you use Firefox and the wonderful extension Zotero, it can generally parse citation information from any webpage, and export a BibTeX-style citation from it.
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
add a comment |
If you use Firefox and the wonderful extension Zotero, it can generally parse citation information from any webpage, and export a BibTeX-style citation from it.
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
add a comment |
If you use Firefox and the wonderful extension Zotero, it can generally parse citation information from any webpage, and export a BibTeX-style citation from it.
If you use Firefox and the wonderful extension Zotero, it can generally parse citation information from any webpage, and export a BibTeX-style citation from it.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:50
ShreevatsaRShreevatsaR
27.2k87198
27.2k87198
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
add a comment |
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
I second that, and for mac users, there is a wonderful plugin for the zotero plugin, called zot2bib, that uses the automatic import function from zotero, to forward the data to BibDesk. Highly recommended! mackerron.com/zot2bib
– Damien Varron
Jul 26 '10 at 21:30
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
@ShreevatsaR, +1 for mentioning Zotero, works well for windows also and for an overview of an automated bibliography workflow this can be helpful.
– doctorate
May 22 '13 at 19:38
add a comment |
Mendeley allows you to sync your collection with a bibtex file.
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
add a comment |
Mendeley allows you to sync your collection with a bibtex file.
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
add a comment |
Mendeley allows you to sync your collection with a bibtex file.
Mendeley allows you to sync your collection with a bibtex file.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 21:59
mbqmbq
2,32222019
2,32222019
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
add a comment |
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
3
3
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I love mendeley. You can upload all your papers to it and afterwise manage your library from any computer since your account is hosted on their server. I host my entire library on my account, and create new collections for every new project I have. Mendeley then allows you to create a .bib file automatically for every collection in your library. I never have to edit a .bib file by myself.
– levesque
Jul 26 '10 at 23:06
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
I like Mendeley too... However it has some limitations. One annoying missing feature: you can't use emph in titles.
– Ludenticus
Jan 20 '15 at 3:14
add a comment |
Since it hasn't appeared in the other answers, Google Scholar also allows you to download a BibTeX citation for each of its search results. You have to enable the feature from the Preferences page, though.
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
add a comment |
Since it hasn't appeared in the other answers, Google Scholar also allows you to download a BibTeX citation for each of its search results. You have to enable the feature from the Preferences page, though.
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
add a comment |
Since it hasn't appeared in the other answers, Google Scholar also allows you to download a BibTeX citation for each of its search results. You have to enable the feature from the Preferences page, though.
Since it hasn't appeared in the other answers, Google Scholar also allows you to download a BibTeX citation for each of its search results. You have to enable the feature from the Preferences page, though.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 21:39
David ZDavid Z
8,26013956
8,26013956
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
add a comment |
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
5
5
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
I have found Google Scholar citations to be among the worst available. It is nearly always worth trying to find a BibTeX entry on ScienceDirect, the ACM Portal, or DBLP instead. Inproceedings often becomes Journal, the DOI disappears, and parts of the PDF title can make their way into the list of authors.
– András Salamon
Jul 26 '10 at 22:55
1
1
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
I guess my experience hasn't been quite as bad as yours, but I agree, they're often not put together very well. I generally take the Google Scholar result as a starting point and clean it up, often merging the information with that from other sources.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
2
2
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
What Google Scholar lacks in quality control, it mostly makes up for in ease of access and breadth of coverage
– Jeromy Anglim
Jul 27 '10 at 1:35
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
My experience is that some Google Scholar citations are incomplete.
– Karlo
Nov 27 '15 at 7:36
add a comment |
I maintain my Bibtex database manually (using JabRef as a GUI).
In particular with conference proceedings, it's not possible to find everything that you need in one service, and if you copy & paste information from different services, your bibliography won't be internally consistent. And even if you copy Bibtex entries directly from the publisher's site (e.g., ACM and IEEE services mentioned in other answers), you will get a lot of garbage. Details such as accented characters in authors' names, math in titles, etc., are very often wrong.
MathSciNet is one of the very few sites that I actually trust so much that I usually copy & paste Bibtex entries almost verbatim. DBLP is useful but I nevertheless double-check the information that I get from it.
It's a lot of work initially, but as your Bibtex database grows, you will be able to reuse more and more entries in your new articles - especially as you don't need to check your bibliography again when you are preparing the final versions of your papers. Using Bibtex macros and/or cross-references helps a lot with the manual work.
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
add a comment |
I maintain my Bibtex database manually (using JabRef as a GUI).
In particular with conference proceedings, it's not possible to find everything that you need in one service, and if you copy & paste information from different services, your bibliography won't be internally consistent. And even if you copy Bibtex entries directly from the publisher's site (e.g., ACM and IEEE services mentioned in other answers), you will get a lot of garbage. Details such as accented characters in authors' names, math in titles, etc., are very often wrong.
MathSciNet is one of the very few sites that I actually trust so much that I usually copy & paste Bibtex entries almost verbatim. DBLP is useful but I nevertheless double-check the information that I get from it.
It's a lot of work initially, but as your Bibtex database grows, you will be able to reuse more and more entries in your new articles - especially as you don't need to check your bibliography again when you are preparing the final versions of your papers. Using Bibtex macros and/or cross-references helps a lot with the manual work.
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
add a comment |
I maintain my Bibtex database manually (using JabRef as a GUI).
In particular with conference proceedings, it's not possible to find everything that you need in one service, and if you copy & paste information from different services, your bibliography won't be internally consistent. And even if you copy Bibtex entries directly from the publisher's site (e.g., ACM and IEEE services mentioned in other answers), you will get a lot of garbage. Details such as accented characters in authors' names, math in titles, etc., are very often wrong.
MathSciNet is one of the very few sites that I actually trust so much that I usually copy & paste Bibtex entries almost verbatim. DBLP is useful but I nevertheless double-check the information that I get from it.
It's a lot of work initially, but as your Bibtex database grows, you will be able to reuse more and more entries in your new articles - especially as you don't need to check your bibliography again when you are preparing the final versions of your papers. Using Bibtex macros and/or cross-references helps a lot with the manual work.
I maintain my Bibtex database manually (using JabRef as a GUI).
In particular with conference proceedings, it's not possible to find everything that you need in one service, and if you copy & paste information from different services, your bibliography won't be internally consistent. And even if you copy Bibtex entries directly from the publisher's site (e.g., ACM and IEEE services mentioned in other answers), you will get a lot of garbage. Details such as accented characters in authors' names, math in titles, etc., are very often wrong.
MathSciNet is one of the very few sites that I actually trust so much that I usually copy & paste Bibtex entries almost verbatim. DBLP is useful but I nevertheless double-check the information that I get from it.
It's a lot of work initially, but as your Bibtex database grows, you will be able to reuse more and more entries in your new articles - especially as you don't need to check your bibliography again when you are preparing the final versions of your papers. Using Bibtex macros and/or cross-references helps a lot with the manual work.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 21:03
Jukka SuomelaJukka Suomela
14k86284
14k86284
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
add a comment |
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
+1 for Jabref. The Spires and Arxiv plugins make it easy to add entries without copy-pasting.
– ihuston
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
add a comment |
DBLP has good BibTeX entries for much of computer science. Their coverage is not comprehensive, and they have some awkward gaps pre-2000, but it is one of my favourite sources.
Edit, five years later: DBLP is still a mainstay of my bibliography needs, and now covers 3 million papers, including nearly all papers in the bit of theoretical computer science I am interested in, as well as much of discrete mathematics. It now also includes citations for ECCC and arXiv papers (although these really should not be of type article with the repository as the journal).
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
add a comment |
DBLP has good BibTeX entries for much of computer science. Their coverage is not comprehensive, and they have some awkward gaps pre-2000, but it is one of my favourite sources.
Edit, five years later: DBLP is still a mainstay of my bibliography needs, and now covers 3 million papers, including nearly all papers in the bit of theoretical computer science I am interested in, as well as much of discrete mathematics. It now also includes citations for ECCC and arXiv papers (although these really should not be of type article with the repository as the journal).
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
add a comment |
DBLP has good BibTeX entries for much of computer science. Their coverage is not comprehensive, and they have some awkward gaps pre-2000, but it is one of my favourite sources.
Edit, five years later: DBLP is still a mainstay of my bibliography needs, and now covers 3 million papers, including nearly all papers in the bit of theoretical computer science I am interested in, as well as much of discrete mathematics. It now also includes citations for ECCC and arXiv papers (although these really should not be of type article with the repository as the journal).
DBLP has good BibTeX entries for much of computer science. Their coverage is not comprehensive, and they have some awkward gaps pre-2000, but it is one of my favourite sources.
Edit, five years later: DBLP is still a mainstay of my bibliography needs, and now covers 3 million papers, including nearly all papers in the bit of theoretical computer science I am interested in, as well as much of discrete mathematics. It now also includes citations for ECCC and arXiv papers (although these really should not be of type article with the repository as the journal).
edited Jul 20 '15 at 15:14
answered Jul 26 '10 at 22:53
András SalamonAndrás Salamon
1,27021929
1,27021929
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
add a comment |
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
DBLP is pretty decent quality, unlike, say, Google Scholar.
– Charles Stewart
Jul 27 '10 at 8:55
add a comment |
Another possibility is doi2bib.org which generates BibTeX citations from digital object identifiers (DOI), available for most (recent) publications.
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code]( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )
– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
add a comment |
Another possibility is doi2bib.org which generates BibTeX citations from digital object identifiers (DOI), available for most (recent) publications.
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code]( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )
– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
add a comment |
Another possibility is doi2bib.org which generates BibTeX citations from digital object identifiers (DOI), available for most (recent) publications.
Another possibility is doi2bib.org which generates BibTeX citations from digital object identifiers (DOI), available for most (recent) publications.
answered Jun 17 '14 at 8:34
TomTom
5113
5113
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code]( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )
– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
add a comment |
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code]( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )
– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
This solution is really nice and should appear in the accepted answer.
– Clément
Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
1
1
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
The idea is good. It's a pity this solution is tightly bound up with the website the authors run. The basic functionality is something that a simple script could handle, but it has been wrapped inside a website complete with Google Analytics scripts.
– András Salamon
Jan 23 '15 at 10:55
1
1
The simple script is actually a one-liner:
curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code] ( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
The simple script is actually a one-liner:
curl -LH "Accept: text/bibliography; style=bibtex" http://dx.doi.org/[DOI code] ( academia.stackexchange.com/a/21956/4474 )– T. Verron
May 19 '16 at 14:41
add a comment |
If, through some peculiar combination of circumstances, you find yourself citing a Wikipedia article, the "cite this page" item under the "toolbox" in the left-hand sidebar provides BibTeX information. For example, to cite what is now the current version of the Isaac Newton article, one clicks "cite this page" and receives
@misc{ wiki:xxx,
author = "Wikipedia",
title = "Isaac Newton --- Wikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
year = "2010",
url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&oldid=374986805}",
note = "[Online; accessed 26-July-2010]"
}
The URL in this block includes a reference to the specific version number, so even if the article is changed later, the version being referenced can be retrieved.
add a comment |
If, through some peculiar combination of circumstances, you find yourself citing a Wikipedia article, the "cite this page" item under the "toolbox" in the left-hand sidebar provides BibTeX information. For example, to cite what is now the current version of the Isaac Newton article, one clicks "cite this page" and receives
@misc{ wiki:xxx,
author = "Wikipedia",
title = "Isaac Newton --- Wikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
year = "2010",
url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&oldid=374986805}",
note = "[Online; accessed 26-July-2010]"
}
The URL in this block includes a reference to the specific version number, so even if the article is changed later, the version being referenced can be retrieved.
add a comment |
If, through some peculiar combination of circumstances, you find yourself citing a Wikipedia article, the "cite this page" item under the "toolbox" in the left-hand sidebar provides BibTeX information. For example, to cite what is now the current version of the Isaac Newton article, one clicks "cite this page" and receives
@misc{ wiki:xxx,
author = "Wikipedia",
title = "Isaac Newton --- Wikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
year = "2010",
url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&oldid=374986805}",
note = "[Online; accessed 26-July-2010]"
}
The URL in this block includes a reference to the specific version number, so even if the article is changed later, the version being referenced can be retrieved.
If, through some peculiar combination of circumstances, you find yourself citing a Wikipedia article, the "cite this page" item under the "toolbox" in the left-hand sidebar provides BibTeX information. For example, to cite what is now the current version of the Isaac Newton article, one clicks "cite this page" and receives
@misc{ wiki:xxx,
author = "Wikipedia",
title = "Isaac Newton --- Wikipedia{,} The Free Encyclopedia",
year = "2010",
url = "url{http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&oldid=374986805}",
note = "[Online; accessed 26-July-2010]"
}
The URL in this block includes a reference to the specific version number, so even if the article is changed later, the version being referenced can be retrieved.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 21:32
Blake StaceyBlake Stacey
1,05011113
1,05011113
add a comment |
add a comment |
I use http://www.citeulike.org/ Briliant cite with loads of references and it is a bit of "social" referencing. You can create, import, export collections as bibtex and manage all of them online. It is pre-populated with loads of sources (I personally care only about IEEE which they pre-import via links.)
With this website the reference entry are by far the largest I saw including multiple web-view & purches links, full abstracts and customisable keys. Stopped writting bibtex files by-hand long time ago.
add a comment |
I use http://www.citeulike.org/ Briliant cite with loads of references and it is a bit of "social" referencing. You can create, import, export collections as bibtex and manage all of them online. It is pre-populated with loads of sources (I personally care only about IEEE which they pre-import via links.)
With this website the reference entry are by far the largest I saw including multiple web-view & purches links, full abstracts and customisable keys. Stopped writting bibtex files by-hand long time ago.
add a comment |
I use http://www.citeulike.org/ Briliant cite with loads of references and it is a bit of "social" referencing. You can create, import, export collections as bibtex and manage all of them online. It is pre-populated with loads of sources (I personally care only about IEEE which they pre-import via links.)
With this website the reference entry are by far the largest I saw including multiple web-view & purches links, full abstracts and customisable keys. Stopped writting bibtex files by-hand long time ago.
I use http://www.citeulike.org/ Briliant cite with loads of references and it is a bit of "social" referencing. You can create, import, export collections as bibtex and manage all of them online. It is pre-populated with loads of sources (I personally care only about IEEE which they pre-import via links.)
With this website the reference entry are by far the largest I saw including multiple web-view & purches links, full abstracts and customisable keys. Stopped writting bibtex files by-hand long time ago.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 22:58
DimaDima
7,24273152
7,24273152
add a comment |
add a comment |
A few people have already mentioned MathSciNet (and noted that it is subscription only). The same BibTeX data are freely available from the AMS via MRef.
add a comment |
A few people have already mentioned MathSciNet (and noted that it is subscription only). The same BibTeX data are freely available from the AMS via MRef.
add a comment |
A few people have already mentioned MathSciNet (and noted that it is subscription only). The same BibTeX data are freely available from the AMS via MRef.
A few people have already mentioned MathSciNet (and noted that it is subscription only). The same BibTeX data are freely available from the AMS via MRef.
answered Aug 1 '10 at 19:12
Mark MeckesMark Meckes
7,62192928
7,62192928
add a comment |
add a comment |
http://www.bibtexsearch.com/ offers a simple search interface to millions of BibTeX records.
add a comment |
http://www.bibtexsearch.com/ offers a simple search interface to millions of BibTeX records.
add a comment |
http://www.bibtexsearch.com/ offers a simple search interface to millions of BibTeX records.
http://www.bibtexsearch.com/ offers a simple search interface to millions of BibTeX records.
answered Mar 17 '15 at 15:19
JimmeJimme
611
611
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Spires database of high energy particle and astrophysics papers can display its results in Bibtex format.
They also have some tools to help update bibliography lists.
add a comment |
The Spires database of high energy particle and astrophysics papers can display its results in Bibtex format.
They also have some tools to help update bibliography lists.
add a comment |
The Spires database of high energy particle and astrophysics papers can display its results in Bibtex format.
They also have some tools to help update bibliography lists.
The Spires database of high energy particle and astrophysics papers can display its results in Bibtex format.
They also have some tools to help update bibliography lists.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:50
ihustonihuston
25123
25123
add a comment |
add a comment |
For computer science the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies is very useful.
add a comment |
For computer science the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies is very useful.
add a comment |
For computer science the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies is very useful.
For computer science the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies is very useful.
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:53
Kristoffer Arnsfelt HansenKristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen
2,61021412
2,61021412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Slightly orthogonal to the actual question, but hopefully useful to anyone interested in the answers to it, there are libraries that convert from one format to another and these can often be more useful than finding a website that exports them in exactly the right format.
For example, for PHP then bibliophile has a library for converting to and from BibTeX. This is used by programs such as refbase for exporting references in BibTeX format.
Indeed, rather than a piecemeal approach, I would recommend using a reference program which can import and export to several formats (including BibTeX). Some have been mentioned in the answers above already.
add a comment |
Slightly orthogonal to the actual question, but hopefully useful to anyone interested in the answers to it, there are libraries that convert from one format to another and these can often be more useful than finding a website that exports them in exactly the right format.
For example, for PHP then bibliophile has a library for converting to and from BibTeX. This is used by programs such as refbase for exporting references in BibTeX format.
Indeed, rather than a piecemeal approach, I would recommend using a reference program which can import and export to several formats (including BibTeX). Some have been mentioned in the answers above already.
add a comment |
Slightly orthogonal to the actual question, but hopefully useful to anyone interested in the answers to it, there are libraries that convert from one format to another and these can often be more useful than finding a website that exports them in exactly the right format.
For example, for PHP then bibliophile has a library for converting to and from BibTeX. This is used by programs such as refbase for exporting references in BibTeX format.
Indeed, rather than a piecemeal approach, I would recommend using a reference program which can import and export to several formats (including BibTeX). Some have been mentioned in the answers above already.
Slightly orthogonal to the actual question, but hopefully useful to anyone interested in the answers to it, there are libraries that convert from one format to another and these can often be more useful than finding a website that exports them in exactly the right format.
For example, for PHP then bibliophile has a library for converting to and from BibTeX. This is used by programs such as refbase for exporting references in BibTeX format.
Indeed, rather than a piecemeal approach, I would recommend using a reference program which can import and export to several formats (including BibTeX). Some have been mentioned in the answers above already.
answered Jul 27 '10 at 6:57
Loop SpaceLoop Space
111k29303602
111k29303602
add a comment |
add a comment |
I use BibSonomy to find and share Bibtex records. You may not find everything there, but with more and more users this should improve in time.
add a comment |
I use BibSonomy to find and share Bibtex records. You may not find everything there, but with more and more users this should improve in time.
add a comment |
I use BibSonomy to find and share Bibtex records. You may not find everything there, but with more and more users this should improve in time.
I use BibSonomy to find and share Bibtex records. You may not find everything there, but with more and more users this should improve in time.
answered Jul 27 '10 at 7:26
maikmaik
1511
1511
add a comment |
add a comment |
Unfortunately, the largest source of medical, biological and bioinformatical papers, PubMed, doesn’t offer a BibTeX export (yet?).
As a workaround, there is the service TeXMed that transforms the numeric PubMed identifiers to BibTeX citations. It’s not very usable but still it’s better than nothing.
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
add a comment |
Unfortunately, the largest source of medical, biological and bioinformatical papers, PubMed, doesn’t offer a BibTeX export (yet?).
As a workaround, there is the service TeXMed that transforms the numeric PubMed identifiers to BibTeX citations. It’s not very usable but still it’s better than nothing.
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
add a comment |
Unfortunately, the largest source of medical, biological and bioinformatical papers, PubMed, doesn’t offer a BibTeX export (yet?).
As a workaround, there is the service TeXMed that transforms the numeric PubMed identifiers to BibTeX citations. It’s not very usable but still it’s better than nothing.
Unfortunately, the largest source of medical, biological and bioinformatical papers, PubMed, doesn’t offer a BibTeX export (yet?).
As a workaround, there is the service TeXMed that transforms the numeric PubMed identifiers to BibTeX citations. It’s not very usable but still it’s better than nothing.
edited Aug 1 '10 at 19:09
answered Jul 27 '10 at 7:45
Konrad RudolphKonrad Rudolph
26.5k1786139
26.5k1786139
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
add a comment |
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
JabRef allow PubMed searchs that are imported directly to BibTeX format.
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:17
add a comment |
Many scientific journals have readily available bibtex references available on their websites.
Here is a random one I found on ACM for instance:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1291536&jmp=cit&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=96100051&CFTOKEN=92185154#
add a comment |
Many scientific journals have readily available bibtex references available on their websites.
Here is a random one I found on ACM for instance:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1291536&jmp=cit&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=96100051&CFTOKEN=92185154#
add a comment |
Many scientific journals have readily available bibtex references available on their websites.
Here is a random one I found on ACM for instance:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1291536&jmp=cit&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=96100051&CFTOKEN=92185154#
Many scientific journals have readily available bibtex references available on their websites.
Here is a random one I found on ACM for instance:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1291536&jmp=cit&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=96100051&CFTOKEN=92185154#
answered Jul 26 '10 at 20:46
Daniel EgebergDaniel Egeberg
2,7901516
2,7901516
add a comment |
add a comment |
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet: Nelson Beebe maintains an extensive database of references for mathematics and computer science.
add a comment |
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet: Nelson Beebe maintains an extensive database of references for mathematics and computer science.
add a comment |
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet: Nelson Beebe maintains an extensive database of references for mathematics and computer science.
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet: Nelson Beebe maintains an extensive database of references for mathematics and computer science.
answered Aug 1 '10 at 18:32
Arthur ReutenauerArthur Reutenauer
2,5271417
2,5271417
add a comment |
add a comment |
Recently I found a website which gives bibtex by isbn numbers.
ottobib
add a comment |
Recently I found a website which gives bibtex by isbn numbers.
ottobib
add a comment |
Recently I found a website which gives bibtex by isbn numbers.
ottobib
Recently I found a website which gives bibtex by isbn numbers.
ottobib
answered Nov 27 '15 at 7:08
DavidDavid
933920
933920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Use this site:
PubTransformer
to transform any pubmed paper into bibtex and other formats such as: ADS, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.
add a comment |
Use this site:
PubTransformer
to transform any pubmed paper into bibtex and other formats such as: ADS, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.
add a comment |
Use this site:
PubTransformer
to transform any pubmed paper into bibtex and other formats such as: ADS, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.
Use this site:
PubTransformer
to transform any pubmed paper into bibtex and other formats such as: ADS, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.
edited Aug 29 '16 at 15:58
answered Aug 21 '12 at 17:49
cs0815cs0815
1112
1112
add a comment |
add a comment |
In my experience Jabref doesn't handle certain characters well, and there's always quite a bit of manual fixing involved when someone uses it to translate some other format to bib format. Endnote comes to mind.
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
add a comment |
In my experience Jabref doesn't handle certain characters well, and there's always quite a bit of manual fixing involved when someone uses it to translate some other format to bib format. Endnote comes to mind.
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
add a comment |
In my experience Jabref doesn't handle certain characters well, and there's always quite a bit of manual fixing involved when someone uses it to translate some other format to bib format. Endnote comes to mind.
In my experience Jabref doesn't handle certain characters well, and there's always quite a bit of manual fixing involved when someone uses it to translate some other format to bib format. Endnote comes to mind.
answered Nov 21 '10 at 2:28
bevbev
1,2151316
1,2151316
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
add a comment |
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
2
2
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
Just in "Database proterties" change the encoding to UTF-8 (or the appropiate in your case).
– Fran
Sep 18 '12 at 12:15
add a comment |
For the past few months I have been using bibtex-search which is a great little node.js program written or maintained by ekmartin that you use in the CLI/terminal. All that you need to do is open up the terminal and enter bibtex-search -source google followed by the title of work being sought and the last name of the author. It will return the bibtex source and copy this to your clipboard for you! so that all you need to do is paste it into your bib file. I use jabref with Docear so I do not necessarily paste the clipboard contents into my bib file; but I could if I wanted to.
Installation
Assuming that you already have node.js installed...
$ npm install --global bibtex-search
Usage
$ bibtex-search <query>
Options:
--source, -s Where to find papers from (default: acm) - valid options: [acm, ieee, google]
Examples:
$ bibtex-search bayou
$ bibtex-search --source google zaharia spark
add a comment |
For the past few months I have been using bibtex-search which is a great little node.js program written or maintained by ekmartin that you use in the CLI/terminal. All that you need to do is open up the terminal and enter bibtex-search -source google followed by the title of work being sought and the last name of the author. It will return the bibtex source and copy this to your clipboard for you! so that all you need to do is paste it into your bib file. I use jabref with Docear so I do not necessarily paste the clipboard contents into my bib file; but I could if I wanted to.
Installation
Assuming that you already have node.js installed...
$ npm install --global bibtex-search
Usage
$ bibtex-search <query>
Options:
--source, -s Where to find papers from (default: acm) - valid options: [acm, ieee, google]
Examples:
$ bibtex-search bayou
$ bibtex-search --source google zaharia spark
add a comment |
For the past few months I have been using bibtex-search which is a great little node.js program written or maintained by ekmartin that you use in the CLI/terminal. All that you need to do is open up the terminal and enter bibtex-search -source google followed by the title of work being sought and the last name of the author. It will return the bibtex source and copy this to your clipboard for you! so that all you need to do is paste it into your bib file. I use jabref with Docear so I do not necessarily paste the clipboard contents into my bib file; but I could if I wanted to.
Installation
Assuming that you already have node.js installed...
$ npm install --global bibtex-search
Usage
$ bibtex-search <query>
Options:
--source, -s Where to find papers from (default: acm) - valid options: [acm, ieee, google]
Examples:
$ bibtex-search bayou
$ bibtex-search --source google zaharia spark
For the past few months I have been using bibtex-search which is a great little node.js program written or maintained by ekmartin that you use in the CLI/terminal. All that you need to do is open up the terminal and enter bibtex-search -source google followed by the title of work being sought and the last name of the author. It will return the bibtex source and copy this to your clipboard for you! so that all you need to do is paste it into your bib file. I use jabref with Docear so I do not necessarily paste the clipboard contents into my bib file; but I could if I wanted to.
Installation
Assuming that you already have node.js installed...
$ npm install --global bibtex-search
Usage
$ bibtex-search <query>
Options:
--source, -s Where to find papers from (default: acm) - valid options: [acm, ieee, google]
Examples:
$ bibtex-search bayou
$ bibtex-search --source google zaharia spark
answered 3 hours ago
redapemusic35redapemusic35
535
535
add a comment |
add a comment |
Qiqqa.com helps you quickly and semiautomatically associate bibtex with your PDFs. You can then export a .bib file of all your references for use with latex/bibtex.
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
add a comment |
Qiqqa.com helps you quickly and semiautomatically associate bibtex with your PDFs. You can then export a .bib file of all your references for use with latex/bibtex.
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
add a comment |
Qiqqa.com helps you quickly and semiautomatically associate bibtex with your PDFs. You can then export a .bib file of all your references for use with latex/bibtex.
Qiqqa.com helps you quickly and semiautomatically associate bibtex with your PDFs. You can then export a .bib file of all your references for use with latex/bibtex.
answered Dec 17 '14 at 15:38
JimmeJimme
11
11
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
add a comment |
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
Why the downvote? This seems useful to me?
– yyzz
Dec 17 '14 at 16:27
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
I'm not sure that this helps find citation data: can you elaborate?
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 17 '14 at 21:18
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
Seems to be Windows only. Even the web version turns out to be just a companion for the Windows thing.
– cfr
Jul 20 '15 at 15:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143%2fwhat-are-good-sites-to-find-citations-in-bibtex-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think this might be a good candidate for CW, so we can have one answer that can be edited to contain all the other suggestions.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 21:37
@David: CW or not, I think it's better to have separate suggestions in multiple answers (even if they're from the same person) so that they can be voted on independently.
– ShreevatsaR
Jul 26 '10 at 21:53
@ShreevatsaR: true, I guess what I had in mind was one answer that would be a compilation of the information in the rest of the answers. The reason being, there are a lot of site suggestions that could be made, and while some are better than others, there isn't any single one that could be considered the definitive right answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:44
4
I went ahead and made a compilation answer.
– David Z
Jul 26 '10 at 22:56
1
I guess community wiki is indeed a good idea. I accepted David's answer for now, and everybody adding a new answer could add the new page to that answer as well.
– Nils Schmidt
Jul 28 '10 at 18:45