Lorenz attractor path-connected?












6












$begingroup$


Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.






gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    7 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.






gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    7 hours ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.






gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Can we tell if the Lorenz attractor is path-connected? By the attractor I do not mean only the line weaving around, but rather its closure.






gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected




gn.general-topology ds.dynamical-systems path-connected






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 48 mins ago







Douglas Sirk













New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









Douglas SirkDouglas Sirk

312




312




New contributor




Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Douglas Sirk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    7 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    7 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
You had two chances to spell Lorenz right and you have failed twice :P
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.



The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    55 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321261%2florenz-attractor-path-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.



The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    55 mins ago
















7












$begingroup$

The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.



The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    55 mins ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.



The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The question has been answered here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297836/121665. It is connected but not path connected.



The situation is somewhat similar to the topologist's sine curve: the graph of
$$
f(x)=sinfrac{1}{x},
quad xin (0,1]
$$
is path connected, but its closure (as a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$) is connected, but not path connected.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz

7,04642457




7,04642457












  • $begingroup$
    I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    55 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
    $endgroup$
    – Douglas Sirk
    55 mins ago
















$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
I do not think the answer in the link directly applies to the Lorenz attractor. We can see in the picture that in the closure of the weaving line, there will be new paths touching the weaving line. These will appear where the "forking" occurs.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
5 hours ago














$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
55 mins ago




$begingroup$
It now appears to me that every irreducible subcontinuum of the Lorenz attractor is an arc. And therefore it is path-connected.
$endgroup$
– Douglas Sirk
55 mins ago










Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Douglas Sirk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321261%2florenz-attractor-path-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Image
0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{
Read more

Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

Image
1 In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results? python scikit-learn cross-validation share | improve this question edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52 desertnaut 20.3k 7 43 79
Read more

Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)

Image
0 I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document">
Read more