1026

Multi tool use
SÉCULOS:
|
Século X — Século XI — Século XII
|
DÉCADAS:
|
970 • 980 • 990 • 1000 • 1010 • 1020 • 1030 • 1040 • 1050 • 1060 • 1070
|
ANOS:
|
1021 • 1022 • 1023 • 1024 • 1025 • 1026 • 1027 • 1028 • 1029 • 1030 • 1031
|
1026 em outros calendários
Calendário gregoriano
|
1026 MXXVI
|
Ab urbe condita
|
1779
|
Calendário arménio
|
N/A
|
Calendário chinês
|
3722 – 3723
|
Calendário judaico
|
4786 – 4787
|
Calendários hindus - Vikram Samvat - Shaka Samvat - Kali Yuga
|
1081 – 1082 948 – 949 4127 – 4128
|
Calendário persa
|
404 – 405
|
Calendário islâmico
|
417 – 418
|
Calendário rúnico
|
1276
|
1026 (MXXVI, na numeração romana) foi um ano comum do século XI do Calendário Juliano, da Era de Cristo, a sua letra dominical foi B (52 semanas), teve início a um sábado e terminou também a um sábado.
No território que viria a ser o reino de Portugal estava em vigor a Era de César que já contava 1064 anos.
Ano completo
|
Ano comum com início ao sábado

|
Nascimentos |
Tostigo, Conde da Nortúmbria (data provável).
Por tema
Referências
O Commons possui uma categoria contendo imagens e outros ficheiros sobre 1026
Q3LwAbzy 87J 8Bx0Zheb2gwb4AO7abY d,22Co6Brj,EN,zSe1lPuFRqxNExTJa3
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
0
I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...