Install working full texlive on CentOS
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compile my latex presentation (github-link) on CentOS 7. It worked on arch linux before. I tried to install texlive via
sudo yum install texlive*
That didn't give me all files I needed, so I downloaded missing files from ctan.org and put them in a directory ~/texmf/tex/latex/ . I also confirmed with kpsewhich that these files will be used.
When trying to compile with pdflatex presentation.tex I get a lot of errors pointing to biblatex:
...
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex.sty
LaTeX Warning: You have requested, on input line 37, version
`2018/01/30' of package pdftexcmds,
but only version
`2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO)'
is available.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etoolbox/etoolbox.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etex-pkg/etex.sty))
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.sty
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.def))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty)
! Missing endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
blx@datamodel@constant@optiondatatypes
l.6388 ...odel@constant@optiondatatypesendcsname}
?
Not sure if the warning is relevant.
I don't think there is something wrong with the biblatex.sty. So why do I keep getting those errors and how can I install a working texlive in CentOS without downloading packages from ctan separately?
Another error I got pointed to my own code. I can avoid that by commenting lines out, but this code looks ok to me, too, and as I said: It did work on arch linux:
if@noSectionSlideelse%
AtBeginSection{
ifbeamer@inframe
sectionpage
else
frame[plain,c]{sectionpage}
fi
}
fi
leads to
! Undefined control sequence.
l.107 if@noSectionSlide
which again makes me think that there is something wrong with the texlive installation and that's frustrating.
texlive centos
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compile my latex presentation (github-link) on CentOS 7. It worked on arch linux before. I tried to install texlive via
sudo yum install texlive*
That didn't give me all files I needed, so I downloaded missing files from ctan.org and put them in a directory ~/texmf/tex/latex/ . I also confirmed with kpsewhich that these files will be used.
When trying to compile with pdflatex presentation.tex I get a lot of errors pointing to biblatex:
...
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex.sty
LaTeX Warning: You have requested, on input line 37, version
`2018/01/30' of package pdftexcmds,
but only version
`2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO)'
is available.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etoolbox/etoolbox.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etex-pkg/etex.sty))
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.sty
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.def))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty)
! Missing endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
blx@datamodel@constant@optiondatatypes
l.6388 ...odel@constant@optiondatatypesendcsname}
?
Not sure if the warning is relevant.
I don't think there is something wrong with the biblatex.sty. So why do I keep getting those errors and how can I install a working texlive in CentOS without downloading packages from ctan separately?
Another error I got pointed to my own code. I can avoid that by commenting lines out, but this code looks ok to me, too, and as I said: It did work on arch linux:
if@noSectionSlideelse%
AtBeginSection{
ifbeamer@inframe
sectionpage
else
frame[plain,c]{sectionpage}
fi
}
fi
leads to
! Undefined control sequence.
l.107 if@noSectionSlide
which again makes me think that there is something wrong with the texlive installation and that's frustrating.
texlive centos
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and foundtexlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.
– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compile my latex presentation (github-link) on CentOS 7. It worked on arch linux before. I tried to install texlive via
sudo yum install texlive*
That didn't give me all files I needed, so I downloaded missing files from ctan.org and put them in a directory ~/texmf/tex/latex/ . I also confirmed with kpsewhich that these files will be used.
When trying to compile with pdflatex presentation.tex I get a lot of errors pointing to biblatex:
...
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex.sty
LaTeX Warning: You have requested, on input line 37, version
`2018/01/30' of package pdftexcmds,
but only version
`2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO)'
is available.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etoolbox/etoolbox.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etex-pkg/etex.sty))
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.sty
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.def))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty)
! Missing endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
blx@datamodel@constant@optiondatatypes
l.6388 ...odel@constant@optiondatatypesendcsname}
?
Not sure if the warning is relevant.
I don't think there is something wrong with the biblatex.sty. So why do I keep getting those errors and how can I install a working texlive in CentOS without downloading packages from ctan separately?
Another error I got pointed to my own code. I can avoid that by commenting lines out, but this code looks ok to me, too, and as I said: It did work on arch linux:
if@noSectionSlideelse%
AtBeginSection{
ifbeamer@inframe
sectionpage
else
frame[plain,c]{sectionpage}
fi
}
fi
leads to
! Undefined control sequence.
l.107 if@noSectionSlide
which again makes me think that there is something wrong with the texlive installation and that's frustrating.
texlive centos
I'm trying to compile my latex presentation (github-link) on CentOS 7. It worked on arch linux before. I tried to install texlive via
sudo yum install texlive*
That didn't give me all files I needed, so I downloaded missing files from ctan.org and put them in a directory ~/texmf/tex/latex/ . I also confirmed with kpsewhich that these files will be used.
When trying to compile with pdflatex presentation.tex I get a lot of errors pointing to biblatex:
...
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/biblatex.sty
LaTeX Warning: You have requested, on input line 37, version
`2018/01/30' of package pdftexcmds,
but only version
`2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO)'
is available.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etoolbox/etoolbox.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/etex-pkg/etex.sty))
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.sty
(/home/me/texmf/tex/latex/logreq.def))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ifthen.sty)
! Missing endcsname inserted.
<to be read again>
blx@datamodel@constant@optiondatatypes
l.6388 ...odel@constant@optiondatatypesendcsname}
?
Not sure if the warning is relevant.
I don't think there is something wrong with the biblatex.sty. So why do I keep getting those errors and how can I install a working texlive in CentOS without downloading packages from ctan separately?
Another error I got pointed to my own code. I can avoid that by commenting lines out, but this code looks ok to me, too, and as I said: It did work on arch linux:
if@noSectionSlideelse%
AtBeginSection{
ifbeamer@inframe
sectionpage
else
frame[plain,c]{sectionpage}
fi
}
fi
leads to
! Undefined control sequence.
l.107 if@noSectionSlide
which again makes me think that there is something wrong with the texlive installation and that's frustrating.
texlive centos
texlive centos
asked 53 mins ago
Sadik
17716
17716
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and foundtexlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.
– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago
add a comment |
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and foundtexlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.
– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and found
texlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and found
texlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462097%2finstall-working-full-texlive-on-centos%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I just checked mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages and found
texlive-2012-38.20130427_r30134.el7.x86_64.rpm, i.e. TeX Live 2012. That is ancient by TeX Live standards. You should install “vanilla” TeX Live instead. There is already a question about how to that here: How to install “vanilla” TeXLive on Fedora? I know, Cent OS is not Fedora but they are both from the RedHat family.– Henri Menke
39 mins ago
Also, be advised that TeX Live support on Fedora-like Linux is notoriously garbage. See my comments on this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/450184/…
– Henri Menke
37 mins ago