what should be the max allowed image size for micro services on kubernetes












0















Some times I observe Imagepullbackoff or Imagepullerror in kubernets deployment.
Is there any restriction for docker image size on kubernets for pulling image.



Thanks










share|improve this question























  • imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:20
















0















Some times I observe Imagepullbackoff or Imagepullerror in kubernets deployment.
Is there any restriction for docker image size on kubernets for pulling image.



Thanks










share|improve this question























  • imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:20














0












0








0








Some times I observe Imagepullbackoff or Imagepullerror in kubernets deployment.
Is there any restriction for docker image size on kubernets for pulling image.



Thanks










share|improve this question














Some times I observe Imagepullbackoff or Imagepullerror in kubernets deployment.
Is there any restriction for docker image size on kubernets for pulling image.



Thanks







docker kubernetes






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 28 '18 at 0:09









KhumarKhumar

469




469













  • imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:20



















  • imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:20

















imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

– Ijaz Ahmad Khan
Nov 28 '18 at 0:20





imagesize should be small , but it doesnt mean that there is some restriction , untill you exaust ur storage

– Ijaz Ahmad Khan
Nov 28 '18 at 0:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














It's straightforward to get a ~1 GB image (anything that apt-get install build-essential will clock in in the hundreds of megabytes easily), and the Kubernetes clusters I use day-to-day handle that just fine.



In the past I've had trouble with Docker with single layers in the 1 GB+ range, and whole images in the 5 GB+ range. These have generally manifested as problems with docker push and docker pull being unreliable, and those in turn could correspond to the Kubernetes errors you're seeing.



As a general rule, if you're building containers by taking a language runtime and adding your application on top of it, and you're not trying to bundle any especially large data set into your container, you're probably fine, even if you're being inefficient about how you build it.



(Alpine isn't a silver bullet here: you might save ~150 MB over an Ubuntu base image, but if you're still installing a full C toolchain and adding a big dataset into the image proper, you'll easily get up into the problematic range. A ~200-300 MB Ubuntu-based container will work just fine and won't cause any operational problems beyond the time and space required to pull it.)






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53510163%2fwhat-should-be-the-max-allowed-image-size-for-micro-services-on-kubernetes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    It's straightforward to get a ~1 GB image (anything that apt-get install build-essential will clock in in the hundreds of megabytes easily), and the Kubernetes clusters I use day-to-day handle that just fine.



    In the past I've had trouble with Docker with single layers in the 1 GB+ range, and whole images in the 5 GB+ range. These have generally manifested as problems with docker push and docker pull being unreliable, and those in turn could correspond to the Kubernetes errors you're seeing.



    As a general rule, if you're building containers by taking a language runtime and adding your application on top of it, and you're not trying to bundle any especially large data set into your container, you're probably fine, even if you're being inefficient about how you build it.



    (Alpine isn't a silver bullet here: you might save ~150 MB over an Ubuntu base image, but if you're still installing a full C toolchain and adding a big dataset into the image proper, you'll easily get up into the problematic range. A ~200-300 MB Ubuntu-based container will work just fine and won't cause any operational problems beyond the time and space required to pull it.)






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      It's straightforward to get a ~1 GB image (anything that apt-get install build-essential will clock in in the hundreds of megabytes easily), and the Kubernetes clusters I use day-to-day handle that just fine.



      In the past I've had trouble with Docker with single layers in the 1 GB+ range, and whole images in the 5 GB+ range. These have generally manifested as problems with docker push and docker pull being unreliable, and those in turn could correspond to the Kubernetes errors you're seeing.



      As a general rule, if you're building containers by taking a language runtime and adding your application on top of it, and you're not trying to bundle any especially large data set into your container, you're probably fine, even if you're being inefficient about how you build it.



      (Alpine isn't a silver bullet here: you might save ~150 MB over an Ubuntu base image, but if you're still installing a full C toolchain and adding a big dataset into the image proper, you'll easily get up into the problematic range. A ~200-300 MB Ubuntu-based container will work just fine and won't cause any operational problems beyond the time and space required to pull it.)






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        It's straightforward to get a ~1 GB image (anything that apt-get install build-essential will clock in in the hundreds of megabytes easily), and the Kubernetes clusters I use day-to-day handle that just fine.



        In the past I've had trouble with Docker with single layers in the 1 GB+ range, and whole images in the 5 GB+ range. These have generally manifested as problems with docker push and docker pull being unreliable, and those in turn could correspond to the Kubernetes errors you're seeing.



        As a general rule, if you're building containers by taking a language runtime and adding your application on top of it, and you're not trying to bundle any especially large data set into your container, you're probably fine, even if you're being inefficient about how you build it.



        (Alpine isn't a silver bullet here: you might save ~150 MB over an Ubuntu base image, but if you're still installing a full C toolchain and adding a big dataset into the image proper, you'll easily get up into the problematic range. A ~200-300 MB Ubuntu-based container will work just fine and won't cause any operational problems beyond the time and space required to pull it.)






        share|improve this answer













        It's straightforward to get a ~1 GB image (anything that apt-get install build-essential will clock in in the hundreds of megabytes easily), and the Kubernetes clusters I use day-to-day handle that just fine.



        In the past I've had trouble with Docker with single layers in the 1 GB+ range, and whole images in the 5 GB+ range. These have generally manifested as problems with docker push and docker pull being unreliable, and those in turn could correspond to the Kubernetes errors you're seeing.



        As a general rule, if you're building containers by taking a language runtime and adding your application on top of it, and you're not trying to bundle any especially large data set into your container, you're probably fine, even if you're being inefficient about how you build it.



        (Alpine isn't a silver bullet here: you might save ~150 MB over an Ubuntu base image, but if you're still installing a full C toolchain and adding a big dataset into the image proper, you'll easily get up into the problematic range. A ~200-300 MB Ubuntu-based container will work just fine and won't cause any operational problems beyond the time and space required to pull it.)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 28 '18 at 1:46









        David MazeDavid Maze

        15.1k31429




        15.1k31429
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53510163%2fwhat-should-be-the-max-allowed-image-size-for-micro-services-on-kubernetes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Lallio

            Unable to find Lightning Node

            Futebolista