Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Herbst

Multi tool use
Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Herbst
|
|
Nascimento
|
1 de novembro de 1743 Petershagen
|
Morte
|
5 de novembro de 1807 (64 anos) Berlim
|
Cidadania
|
Alemanha
|
Ocupação
|
lepidopterologia, biólogo, naturalista, carcinólogo
|
[edite no Wikidata]
|
Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Herbst (Petershagen, 1 de novembro de 1743 - Berlim, 5 de novembro de 1807) foi um naturalista alemão.
Entre 1785 e 1806, Herbst e Carl Gustav Jablonsky levaram a cabo a primeira investigação sistemática sobre os coleópteros na Alemanha.
Bibliografia |
Naturgeschichte der in-und ausländischen Insekten (1785-1806, 10 vol.) (em colaboração com Carl Gustav Jablonsky) of Naturgeschichte der in- und ausländischen Insekten
Anleitung zur Kenntnis der Insekten (3 vol., 1784-1786)
Naturgeschichte der Krabben und Krebse (3 vol., 1782-1804)
Einleitung zur Kenntnis der Wür-mer (2 vol., 1787-1788)
Natursystem der ungeflügelten Insekten (4 vol., 1797-1800).
Controle de autoridade |
: Q213695
- WorldCat
- VIAF: 69271097
- CERL: cnp01155605
- GND: 136567495
- ISNI: ID
- LCCN: no00022152
- NKC: mzk2008473266
- NTA: 183838866
- SUDOC: 071431799
- OL: OL7187172A
|
y 92Gl,Fe,sGBX0vFJeFiMFKIxAz7Qyftfs,eABzo73U1 DuYM4
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
0
I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...