How to arrange inference rules in a figure so that they are as tight as possible?
I am wondering how people manage to arrange their inference rules so that it's not only enjoyable to look at but also very compact. For instance, when I use bussproofs and the following trees:
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
end{prooftree}
The current way I do it is by using multicols and manually arrange their alignment. But this is not very satisfactory, and if I change the layout of the article, then I will have to go through all the figures containing inference rules and rearrange them again.
Is there a good way for you to improve the situation?
bussproofs
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
add a comment |
I am wondering how people manage to arrange their inference rules so that it's not only enjoyable to look at but also very compact. For instance, when I use bussproofs and the following trees:
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
end{prooftree}
The current way I do it is by using multicols and manually arrange their alignment. But this is not very satisfactory, and if I change the layout of the article, then I will have to go through all the figures containing inference rules and rearrange them again.
Is there a good way for you to improve the situation?
bussproofs
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
add a comment |
I am wondering how people manage to arrange their inference rules so that it's not only enjoyable to look at but also very compact. For instance, when I use bussproofs and the following trees:
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
end{prooftree}
The current way I do it is by using multicols and manually arrange their alignment. But this is not very satisfactory, and if I change the layout of the article, then I will have to go through all the figures containing inference rules and rearrange them again.
Is there a good way for you to improve the situation?
bussproofs
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
I am wondering how people manage to arrange their inference rules so that it's not only enjoyable to look at but also very compact. For instance, when I use bussproofs and the following trees:
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
end{prooftree}
begin{prooftree}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
end{prooftree}
The current way I do it is by using multicols and manually arrange their alignment. But this is not very satisfactory, and if I change the layout of the article, then I will have to go through all the figures containing inference rules and rearrange them again.
Is there a good way for you to improve the situation?
bussproofs
bussproofs
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
asked 59 mins ago
Jason HuJason Hu
1227
1227
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You need not use the prooftree environment:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[1][1-5]
begin{equation*}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
DisplayProof
end{equation*}
lipsum[2]
end{document}
The bussproofs command are flushed when DisplayProof is found and a box is formed.
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477606%2fhow-to-arrange-inference-rules-in-a-figure-so-that-they-are-as-tight-as-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You need not use the prooftree environment:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[1][1-5]
begin{equation*}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
DisplayProof
end{equation*}
lipsum[2]
end{document}
The bussproofs command are flushed when DisplayProof is found and a box is formed.
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
add a comment |
You need not use the prooftree environment:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[1][1-5]
begin{equation*}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
DisplayProof
end{equation*}
lipsum[2]
end{document}
The bussproofs command are flushed when DisplayProof is found and a box is formed.
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
add a comment |
You need not use the prooftree environment:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[1][1-5]
begin{equation*}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
DisplayProof
end{equation*}
lipsum[2]
end{document}
The bussproofs command are flushed when DisplayProof is found and a box is formed.
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
You need not use the prooftree environment:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{bussproofs}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[1][1-5]
begin{equation*}
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: top$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash bot <: T$}
DisplayProof
qquad
AxiomC{}
UnaryInfC{$Gamma vdash T <: T$}
DisplayProof
end{equation*}
lipsum[2]
end{document}
The bussproofs command are flushed when DisplayProof is found and a box is formed.
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
answered 5 mins ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
723k8819173221
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477606%2fhow-to-arrange-inference-rules-in-a-figure-so-that-they-are-as-tight-as-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
