Getting different loss when evaluating the training set in lstm model using keras












0















I am training a LSTM model using stock market data. When I train the model using "model.fit()", I get some loss values. However, when I evaluate the model using the same training set, the loss value is different from the best loss value during training process. Can anyone point out where I am making the mistake? Code is as follows.



def create_model(optimizer,num_neurons,input_timesteps,batch_size,input_dims):
model = Sequential()
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=False, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='linear'))
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=optimizer)
return model

erl_stop = EarlyStopping( monitor='val_loss', mode='min',restore_best_weights=True)
model.fit(x_train,y_train,epochs=num_epochs,batch_size=c['batch_size'],shuffle=False,callbacks=[erl_stop])
train_score=model.evaluate(x_train,y_train,batch_size=c['batch_size'])









share|improve this question




















  • 2





    This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Nov 27 '18 at 9:26
















0















I am training a LSTM model using stock market data. When I train the model using "model.fit()", I get some loss values. However, when I evaluate the model using the same training set, the loss value is different from the best loss value during training process. Can anyone point out where I am making the mistake? Code is as follows.



def create_model(optimizer,num_neurons,input_timesteps,batch_size,input_dims):
model = Sequential()
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=False, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='linear'))
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=optimizer)
return model

erl_stop = EarlyStopping( monitor='val_loss', mode='min',restore_best_weights=True)
model.fit(x_train,y_train,epochs=num_epochs,batch_size=c['batch_size'],shuffle=False,callbacks=[erl_stop])
train_score=model.evaluate(x_train,y_train,batch_size=c['batch_size'])









share|improve this question




















  • 2





    This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Nov 27 '18 at 9:26














0












0








0








I am training a LSTM model using stock market data. When I train the model using "model.fit()", I get some loss values. However, when I evaluate the model using the same training set, the loss value is different from the best loss value during training process. Can anyone point out where I am making the mistake? Code is as follows.



def create_model(optimizer,num_neurons,input_timesteps,batch_size,input_dims):
model = Sequential()
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=False, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='linear'))
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=optimizer)
return model

erl_stop = EarlyStopping( monitor='val_loss', mode='min',restore_best_weights=True)
model.fit(x_train,y_train,epochs=num_epochs,batch_size=c['batch_size'],shuffle=False,callbacks=[erl_stop])
train_score=model.evaluate(x_train,y_train,batch_size=c['batch_size'])









share|improve this question
















I am training a LSTM model using stock market data. When I train the model using "model.fit()", I get some loss values. However, when I evaluate the model using the same training set, the loss value is different from the best loss value during training process. Can anyone point out where I am making the mistake? Code is as follows.



def create_model(optimizer,num_neurons,input_timesteps,batch_size,input_dims):
model = Sequential()
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add (LSTM (num_neurons,activation = 'tanh',dropout=0.2,stateful=True,
return_sequences=False, batch_input_shape =(batch_size,input_timesteps, input_dims) ))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='linear'))
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=optimizer)
return model

erl_stop = EarlyStopping( monitor='val_loss', mode='min',restore_best_weights=True)
model.fit(x_train,y_train,epochs=num_epochs,batch_size=c['batch_size'],shuffle=False,callbacks=[erl_stop])
train_score=model.evaluate(x_train,y_train,batch_size=c['batch_size'])






python keras lstm






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 27 '18 at 6:46







Suman

















asked Nov 27 '18 at 4:46









SumanSuman

198




198








  • 2





    This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Nov 27 '18 at 9:26














  • 2





    This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

    – Matias Valdenegro
    Nov 27 '18 at 9:26








2




2





This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

– Matias Valdenegro
Nov 27 '18 at 9:26





This is completely normal, your network has Dropout, which doesn't behave the same during training and during inference. When you evaluate the model, you are doing inference, so the loss isn't the same.

– Matias Valdenegro
Nov 27 '18 at 9:26












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53492918%2fgetting-different-loss-when-evaluating-the-training-set-in-lstm-model-using-kera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53492918%2fgetting-different-loss-when-evaluating-the-training-set-in-lstm-model-using-kera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Lallio

Unable to find Lightning Node

Futebolista