Conditionally enable Jenkins declarative pipeline options?












0















Does Jenkins provide any functionality to achieve the following pipeline described below?



pipeline

{

    agent any

    options

    {

        when {

            branch 'master'

        }

        disableConcurrentBuilds()

    }

    stages { ... }

}


I have two states for repositories which this single pipeline must manage:




  1. Build for commits to merge-requests branches (pre-merge), allow builds to be run concurrently

  2. Build the master branch on merge of merge-requests (post-merge), do not allow builds to be run concurrently.






jenkins jenkins-plugins jenkins-pipeline







share|improve this question























  • You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

    – Joerg S
    Nov 29 '18 at 5:43
















0















Does Jenkins provide any functionality to achieve the following pipeline described below?



pipeline

{

    agent any

    options

    {

        when {

            branch 'master'

        }

        disableConcurrentBuilds()

    }

    stages { ... }

}


I have two states for repositories which this single pipeline must manage:




  1. Build for commits to merge-requests branches (pre-merge), allow builds to be run concurrently

  2. Build the master branch on merge of merge-requests (post-merge), do not allow builds to be run concurrently.






jenkins jenkins-plugins jenkins-pipeline







share|improve this question























  • You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

    – Joerg S
    Nov 29 '18 at 5:43














0












0








0








Does Jenkins provide any functionality to achieve the following pipeline described below?



pipeline

{

    agent any

    options

    {

        when {

            branch 'master'

        }

        disableConcurrentBuilds()

    }

    stages { ... }

}


I have two states for repositories which this single pipeline must manage:




  1. Build for commits to merge-requests branches (pre-merge), allow builds to be run concurrently

  2. Build the master branch on merge of merge-requests (post-merge), do not allow builds to be run concurrently.






jenkins jenkins-plugins jenkins-pipeline







share|improve this question














Does Jenkins provide any functionality to achieve the following pipeline described below?



pipeline

{

    agent any

    options

    {

        when {

            branch 'master'

        }

        disableConcurrentBuilds()

    }

    stages { ... }

}


I have two states for repositories which this single pipeline must manage:




  1. Build for commits to merge-requests branches (pre-merge), allow builds to be run concurrently

  2. Build the master branch on merge of merge-requests (post-merge), do not allow builds to be run concurrently.






jenkins jenkins-plugins jenkins-pipeline




jenkins jenkins-plugins jenkins-pipeline






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 26 '18 at 22:46









Sean PiankaSean Pianka

88211125




88211125













  • You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

    – Joerg S
    Nov 29 '18 at 5:43



















  • You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

    – Joerg S
    Nov 29 '18 at 5:43

















You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

– Joerg S
Nov 29 '18 at 5:43





You’re asking for declarative pipeline - I assume scripted Pipeline would not be an option?

– Joerg S
Nov 29 '18 at 5:43












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53490266%2fconditionally-enable-jenkins-declarative-pipeline-options%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53490266%2fconditionally-enable-jenkins-declarative-pipeline-options%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Image
0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
Read more

Why does System V / AMD64 ABI mandate a 16 byte stack alignment?

Image
2 I've read in different places that it is done for "performance reasons", but I still wonder what are the particular cases where performance get improved by this 16-byte alignment. Or, in any case, what were the reasons why this was chosen. edit : I'm thinking I wrote the question in a misleading way. I wasn't asking about why the processor does things faster with 16-byte aligned memory, this is explained everywhere in the docs. What I wanted to know instead, is how the enforced 16-byte alignment is better than just letting the programmers align the stack themselves when needed. I'm asking this because from my experience with assembly, the stack enforcement has two problems: it is only useful by less 1% percent of the code that is executed (so in the other 99% is actually overhead); and...
Read more

Firebase ML-Kit Barcode Scanning with Multiple Barcodes

Image
0 I'm working on an Android app where the user has to use a camera view to scan a barcode. I've been using Firebase's ML-Kit barcode scanning utility to achieve the actual barcode recognition bit and it's been fantastic. There's only one issue - if given a photo with multiple barcodes in it, it commonly misses at least one of the barcodes. That's problematic because a lot of the barcodes that my users have to scan are on boxes/containers with multiple barcodes. Here's an example Pixel 2 XL box that may need to be scanned: The IMEI barcode in this picture is never picked up by ML-Kit. However; if I crop out everything else and just send the IMEI barcode through ML-Kit picks it up fine. Is there anything I can do to help ML-Kit pick up on all of the barcodes? ...
Read more