Include image in tikz with pixel unit











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In tikzpicture, I can set 1pt as unit but 1px doesn't work! So I guess 1pt equal to 1px. But sounds like almost but not exactly!



This is a example. Original image is 200x150 but the node display is 200.74948ptx150.5621pt!



Should it be exactly 200x150? What's correct way to get 200x150?



documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
%image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
{includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
draw[line width=0.1pt] let
p1=(image.south west),
p2=(image.north east),
n1={(x2-x1)},
n2={(y2-y1)}
in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    In tikzpicture, I can set 1pt as unit but 1px doesn't work! So I guess 1pt equal to 1px. But sounds like almost but not exactly!



    This is a example. Original image is 200x150 but the node display is 200.74948ptx150.5621pt!



    Should it be exactly 200x150? What's correct way to get 200x150?



    documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
    %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
    node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
    {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
    draw[line width=0.1pt] let
    p1=(image.south west),
    p2=(image.north east),
    n1={(x2-x1)},
    n2={(y2-y1)}
    in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    enter image description here










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      In tikzpicture, I can set 1pt as unit but 1px doesn't work! So I guess 1pt equal to 1px. But sounds like almost but not exactly!



      This is a example. Original image is 200x150 but the node display is 200.74948ptx150.5621pt!



      Should it be exactly 200x150? What's correct way to get 200x150?



      documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}
      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
      %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
      node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
      {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
      draw[line width=0.1pt] let
      p1=(image.south west),
      p2=(image.north east),
      n1={(x2-x1)},
      n2={(y2-y1)}
      in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here










      share|improve this question













      In tikzpicture, I can set 1pt as unit but 1px doesn't work! So I guess 1pt equal to 1px. But sounds like almost but not exactly!



      This is a example. Original image is 200x150 but the node display is 200.74948ptx150.5621pt!



      Should it be exactly 200x150? What's correct way to get 200x150?



      documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}
      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
      %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
      node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
      {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
      draw[line width=0.1pt] let
      p1=(image.south west),
      p2=(image.north east),
      n1={(x2-x1)},
      n2={(y2-y1)}
      in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here







      tikz-pgf






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 36 mins ago









      beetlej

      53529




      53529






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I can not tell you why this happens, but I stumbled over this some time ago, and at least back then I did not know if there is a deeper reason. If you look up the conversion rate in the web, you will find that



          1cm = 28.3465pt   (in web).


          However, TikZ claims, as shown in the MWE below, it is



          1cm = 28.45274pt  (Ti*k*Z).


          If you factor in that slight discrepancy, you get, within the rounding errors, a perfect match, as the lowest line in the following output reveals.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{calc}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
          %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
          node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
          {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)},
          n2={(y2-y1)}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
          path let p1=(1cm,0) in node[anchor=west,fill=white] at (0,90) {$x1ne 28.3465pt$};
          pgfmathsetmacro{myconv}{28.3465pt/28.45274}
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)*myconv},
          n2={(y2-y1)*myconv}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,40) {large n1,n2};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
            – beetlej
            2 mins ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463444%2finclude-image-in-tikz-with-pixel-unit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I can not tell you why this happens, but I stumbled over this some time ago, and at least back then I did not know if there is a deeper reason. If you look up the conversion rate in the web, you will find that



          1cm = 28.3465pt   (in web).


          However, TikZ claims, as shown in the MWE below, it is



          1cm = 28.45274pt  (Ti*k*Z).


          If you factor in that slight discrepancy, you get, within the rounding errors, a perfect match, as the lowest line in the following output reveals.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{calc}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
          %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
          node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
          {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)},
          n2={(y2-y1)}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
          path let p1=(1cm,0) in node[anchor=west,fill=white] at (0,90) {$x1ne 28.3465pt$};
          pgfmathsetmacro{myconv}{28.3465pt/28.45274}
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)*myconv},
          n2={(y2-y1)*myconv}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,40) {large n1,n2};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
            – beetlej
            2 mins ago















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I can not tell you why this happens, but I stumbled over this some time ago, and at least back then I did not know if there is a deeper reason. If you look up the conversion rate in the web, you will find that



          1cm = 28.3465pt   (in web).


          However, TikZ claims, as shown in the MWE below, it is



          1cm = 28.45274pt  (Ti*k*Z).


          If you factor in that slight discrepancy, you get, within the rounding errors, a perfect match, as the lowest line in the following output reveals.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{calc}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
          %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
          node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
          {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)},
          n2={(y2-y1)}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
          path let p1=(1cm,0) in node[anchor=west,fill=white] at (0,90) {$x1ne 28.3465pt$};
          pgfmathsetmacro{myconv}{28.3465pt/28.45274}
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)*myconv},
          n2={(y2-y1)*myconv}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,40) {large n1,n2};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
            – beetlej
            2 mins ago













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          I can not tell you why this happens, but I stumbled over this some time ago, and at least back then I did not know if there is a deeper reason. If you look up the conversion rate in the web, you will find that



          1cm = 28.3465pt   (in web).


          However, TikZ claims, as shown in the MWE below, it is



          1cm = 28.45274pt  (Ti*k*Z).


          If you factor in that slight discrepancy, you get, within the rounding errors, a perfect match, as the lowest line in the following output reveals.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{calc}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
          %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
          node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
          {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)},
          n2={(y2-y1)}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
          path let p1=(1cm,0) in node[anchor=west,fill=white] at (0,90) {$x1ne 28.3465pt$};
          pgfmathsetmacro{myconv}{28.3465pt/28.45274}
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)*myconv},
          n2={(y2-y1)*myconv}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,40) {large n1,n2};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer












          I can not tell you why this happens, but I stumbled over this some time ago, and at least back then I did not know if there is a deeper reason. If you look up the conversion rate in the web, you will find that



          1cm = 28.3465pt   (in web).


          However, TikZ claims, as shown in the MWE below, it is



          1cm = 28.45274pt  (Ti*k*Z).


          If you factor in that slight discrepancy, you get, within the rounding errors, a perfect match, as the lowest line in the following output reveals.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{calc}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[x=1pt,y=1pt]
          %image source: /usr/local/texlive/2017/texmf-dist//latex/mwe/example-image-4x3.png
          node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0,outer sep=0] (image) at (0,0)
          {includegraphics{example-image-4x3}};
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)},
          n2={(y2-y1)}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,120) {large n1,n2};
          path let p1=(1cm,0) in node[anchor=west,fill=white] at (0,90) {$x1ne 28.3465pt$};
          pgfmathsetmacro{myconv}{28.3465pt/28.45274}
          draw[line width=0.1pt] let
          p1=(image.south west),
          p2=(image.north east),
          n1={(x2-x1)*myconv},
          n2={(y2-y1)*myconv}
          in node[anchor=west] at (0,40) {large n1,n2};
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 12 mins ago









          marmot

          80.9k491173




          80.9k491173












          • Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
            – beetlej
            2 mins ago


















          • Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
            – beetlej
            2 mins ago
















          Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
          – beetlej
          2 mins ago




          Thanks, what's more, if I add [width=200pt] to includepicture, then I can get 200pt width, but the height is 150.01074pt.
          – beetlej
          2 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463444%2finclude-image-in-tikz-with-pixel-unit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lallio

          Unable to find Lightning Node

          Futebolista