Strange error defining a macro with arguments for math mode
When I delete the second item, it compiles fine. However, with the second item, I get ERROR: Missing $ inserted and the math renders incorrectly:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
newcommand frob[2] {langle #1,#2 rangle_F}
begin{document}
begin{itemize}
item What I want: $
langle A,B rangle_F
geq
langle C,D rangle_F
$.
item What I get: $
frob{A,B}
geq
frob{A,B}
$.
end{itemize}
end{document}

Would appreciate any help with this issue!
math-mode macros
add a comment |
When I delete the second item, it compiles fine. However, with the second item, I get ERROR: Missing $ inserted and the math renders incorrectly:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
newcommand frob[2] {langle #1,#2 rangle_F}
begin{document}
begin{itemize}
item What I want: $
langle A,B rangle_F
geq
langle C,D rangle_F
$.
item What I get: $
frob{A,B}
geq
frob{A,B}
$.
end{itemize}
end{document}

Would appreciate any help with this issue!
math-mode macros
Don't usefrobasfrob{A,B}but use it asfrob{A}{B}. Yourfrob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you dofrob{A,B}geq,frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from{A,B}andfrob's second undelimited argument will be formed fromgeq.
– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago
add a comment |
When I delete the second item, it compiles fine. However, with the second item, I get ERROR: Missing $ inserted and the math renders incorrectly:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
newcommand frob[2] {langle #1,#2 rangle_F}
begin{document}
begin{itemize}
item What I want: $
langle A,B rangle_F
geq
langle C,D rangle_F
$.
item What I get: $
frob{A,B}
geq
frob{A,B}
$.
end{itemize}
end{document}

Would appreciate any help with this issue!
math-mode macros
When I delete the second item, it compiles fine. However, with the second item, I get ERROR: Missing $ inserted and the math renders incorrectly:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
newcommand frob[2] {langle #1,#2 rangle_F}
begin{document}
begin{itemize}
item What I want: $
langle A,B rangle_F
geq
langle C,D rangle_F
$.
item What I get: $
frob{A,B}
geq
frob{A,B}
$.
end{itemize}
end{document}

Would appreciate any help with this issue!
math-mode macros
math-mode macros
asked 14 mins ago
Elliot GorokhovskyElliot Gorokhovsky
348112
348112
Don't usefrobasfrob{A,B}but use it asfrob{A}{B}. Yourfrob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you dofrob{A,B}geq,frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from{A,B}andfrob's second undelimited argument will be formed fromgeq.
– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Don't usefrobasfrob{A,B}but use it asfrob{A}{B}. Yourfrob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you dofrob{A,B}geq,frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from{A,B}andfrob's second undelimited argument will be formed fromgeq.
– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago
Don't use
frob as frob{A,B} but use it as frob{A}{B}. Your frob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you do frob{A,B}geq, frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from {A,B} and frob's second undelimited argument will be formed from geq.– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago
Don't use
frob as frob{A,B} but use it as frob{A}{B}. Your frob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you do frob{A,B}geq, frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from {A,B} and frob's second undelimited argument will be formed from geq.– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472980%2fstrange-error-defining-a-macro-with-arguments-for-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472980%2fstrange-error-defining-a-macro-with-arguments-for-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Don't use
frobasfrob{A,B}but use it asfrob{A}{B}. Yourfrob-macro does process two arguments which are not comma-separated. As result it delivers something where the phrases delivered as arguments will be comma-separated. Maybe this confused you. ;-) If you dofrob{A,B}geq,frob's first undelimited argument will be formed from{A,B}andfrob's second undelimited argument will be formed fromgeq.– Ulrich Diez
2 mins ago