Campo Grande (bairro de São Paulo)

Multi tool use
Campo Grande
Bairro de São Paulo 
|
Fundação:
|
1953
|
Distrito:
|
Campo Grande
|
Subprefeitura:
|
Santo Amaro
|
Região Administrativa:
|
Centro-Sul
|
Campo Grande é um bairro pertencente ao distrito homônimo, localizado na zona centro-sul do município de São Paulo.[1]
Referências
↑ http://www.saopaulobairros.com.br/
SP - São Paulo - Centro-Sul - Subprefeitura de Santo Amaro - Bairros de Campo Grande
Campininha • Campo Grande • Chácara Santa Teresinha • Conjunto Residencial Vila Sabará • Jardim Aliança • Jardim Alva • Jardim Araújo Almeida • Jardim Beatriz • Jardim Bélgica • Jardim Campina • Jardim Campo Grande • Jardim Consórcio • Jardim Diomar • Jardim dos Prados • Jardim Ernestina • Jardim Gea • Jardim Gra • Jardim Hilton Santos • Jardim Ipê • Jardim Juá • Jardim Luanda • Jardim Marajoara • Jardim Sabará • Jardim Santa Branca • Jardim Santa Cruz • Jardim Silvana • Jardim Taquaral • Jardim Ubirajara • Jurubatuba • Sítio Tapera • Vila Andaluzia • Vila Angelina • Vila Anhanguera • Vila Arriete • Vila Bochiglieri • Vila Cabral • Vila Emir • Vila Gaúcha • Vila Imaculada Conceição • Vila Isa • Vila Romano • Vila Santana • Vila São Pedro • Vila Sofia
 |
Este artigo sobre Geografia de São Paulo é um esboço. Você pode ajudar a Wikipédia expandindo-o. |
q hv 2FdnRUaM4Zq3onjZC6AZnaXfKDGS5Y799,el,eaCdM
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
0
I have written a function using curl to generate the token. I check whether the token exists; if not, then I execute the function, otherwise I skip this function and proceed to next. But I am not sure that it will work if a token is expired. Is there any command to identify the expired token and generates the new one by calling this function? #!/bin/ksh export V_TOKEN="gen_token_${V_DATE}.txt" #### Calling function to generate the token function callPOST { curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-url' -d 'grant_type=password&username=usr01&password=pwd...