Is it inappropriate to invite all my coworkers except for one person to a private event?












71















I work in a fairly small department, I have 8 coworkers. 7 of them are great, we're good friends, and I love spending time with them - we hang out outside of work often, but usually in groups of 3-4. The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has to dominate every conversation.



I've recently moved to a new house, and I'd like to have my work friends over for a dinner party. I know it would be a ton of fun with the coworkers I'm close with, and this guy would absolutely ruin it. Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 13





    Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

    – Kevin
    yesterday






  • 12





    Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

    – synthesis
    yesterday






  • 21





    It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

    – jcmack
    yesterday






  • 25





    @jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

    – Flater
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    @flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

    – jcmack
    8 hours ago
















71















I work in a fairly small department, I have 8 coworkers. 7 of them are great, we're good friends, and I love spending time with them - we hang out outside of work often, but usually in groups of 3-4. The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has to dominate every conversation.



I've recently moved to a new house, and I'd like to have my work friends over for a dinner party. I know it would be a ton of fun with the coworkers I'm close with, and this guy would absolutely ruin it. Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 13





    Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

    – Kevin
    yesterday






  • 12





    Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

    – synthesis
    yesterday






  • 21





    It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

    – jcmack
    yesterday






  • 25





    @jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

    – Flater
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    @flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

    – jcmack
    8 hours ago














71












71








71


5






I work in a fairly small department, I have 8 coworkers. 7 of them are great, we're good friends, and I love spending time with them - we hang out outside of work often, but usually in groups of 3-4. The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has to dominate every conversation.



I've recently moved to a new house, and I'd like to have my work friends over for a dinner party. I know it would be a ton of fun with the coworkers I'm close with, and this guy would absolutely ruin it. Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I work in a fairly small department, I have 8 coworkers. 7 of them are great, we're good friends, and I love spending time with them - we hang out outside of work often, but usually in groups of 3-4. The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has to dominate every conversation.



I've recently moved to a new house, and I'd like to have my work friends over for a dinner party. I know it would be a ton of fun with the coworkers I'm close with, and this guy would absolutely ruin it. Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?







colleagues relationships






share|improve this question









New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









SQB

1,091715




1,091715






New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









synthesissynthesis

234124




234124




New contributor




synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






synthesis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 13





    Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

    – Kevin
    yesterday






  • 12





    Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

    – synthesis
    yesterday






  • 21





    It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

    – jcmack
    yesterday






  • 25





    @jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

    – Flater
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    @flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

    – jcmack
    8 hours ago














  • 13





    Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

    – Kevin
    yesterday






  • 12





    Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

    – synthesis
    yesterday






  • 21





    It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

    – jcmack
    yesterday






  • 25





    @jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

    – Flater
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    @flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

    – jcmack
    8 hours ago








13




13





Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

– Kevin
yesterday





Do HR or your boss know about the sexual harassment already? If not, do you have enough documentation (dates, times, details, witnesses if any) to back it up if asked? If HR doesn't know or doesn't believe you, and the guy complains about being excluded, it could be hard to deal with.

– Kevin
yesterday




12




12





Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

– synthesis
yesterday





Yes HR knows, several employees have filed complaints over the past year and nothing's happened.

– synthesis
yesterday




21




21





It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

– jcmack
yesterday





It's not a work-related function so no it's inappropriate. I'd recommend adding significant others or other friends to the mix so it isn't just your work friends. Seems less cliquey that way.

– jcmack
yesterday




25




25





@jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

– Flater
17 hours ago





@jcmack: I'm not quite following. It's not a work function and therefore it's inappropriate to not invite him? This implies that it would be appropriate to not invite him to work functions? Did you get your wires crossed or am I missing something?

– Flater
17 hours ago




8




8





@flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

– jcmack
8 hours ago





@flater Yeah I mistyped. I meant that since it's a private party (i.e. not work-related), you can invite whomever you chose (i.e. it's appropriate to not invite the rude coworker). Just because we're coworkers it doesn't mean we're friends and that I have to spend my own time with you. I just wouldn't called it a work friends party because it does make you seem cliquey. FYI I'm usually one of the ones not invited to my coworkers' drinking parties and honestly I'm not offended.

– jcmack
8 hours ago










14 Answers
14






active

oldest

votes


















98















Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?




It's your party.



That means you get to invite whoever you like and exclude whoever you choose.






share|improve this answer



















  • 28





    And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

    – Peter M
    yesterday








  • 2





    It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

    – BriseFlots
    18 hours ago






  • 3





    Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

    – bornfromanegg
    16 hours ago








  • 4





    @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

    – Joe Strazzere
    14 hours ago






  • 5





    @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

    – JMac
    13 hours ago



















87














If you are all peers, it is simply very, very rude. It sounds like you may not care about that, since the person who you want to exclude deserves to be excluded.



If you are a manager, then it gets problematic, rather than just rude. According to Alison at AskAManager, you are opening yourself up to legitimate charges of favoritism. If you are in HR, that could also be a problem (Another AskAManager link).



If you are all peers, and you want to send a message as well as have a good time, then invite all but the one co-worker.






share|improve this answer



















  • 112





    The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

    – dbeer
    yesterday






  • 46





    It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

    – Echox
    yesterday






  • 6





    @Echox very much yes.

    – thursdaysgeek
    yesterday






  • 34





    @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

    – HopelessN00b
    20 hours ago






  • 23





    @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

    – bornfromanegg
    17 hours ago



















48














You're not inviting your co-workers, you're inviting your friends you happen to work with. That co-worker is not your friend, so you do not invite him.



You may want to inform the invitees that he has not been invited. By your description, they'll probably be relieved, but at the very least they'll know to keep quiet about the invitation if necessary.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

    – rexkogitans
    13 hours ago






  • 7





    Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

    – Jon Bentley
    12 hours ago











  • That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

    – Mazura
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

    – Tas
    4 hours ago



















20














Yes it would be rude, and the possible awkwardness is a risk that you would have to be willing to deal with.



But of course, not inviting him is the right move to make. Him spoiling your party sounds like a far worse outcome.



You just need to prepared for some perhaps passive-aggressive dynamics in the workplace - but I imagine this guy knows why he is being excluded.



The other awkward scenario is that he directly confronts you why he wasn't invited, in which case you can give him an honest and direct answer.






share|improve this answer
























  • From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

    – Jon Bentley
    12 hours ago













  • @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

    – ruakh
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

    – Jon Bentley
    2 hours ago











  • @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

    – ruakh
    2 hours ago








  • 1





    Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

    – R..
    2 hours ago



















10














YOUR house, YOUR rules.



You're not forced to invite an unwanted person in your house around your loved ones (probably including children) who has previous records of misbehaving and sexual harrasement in a public place, let alone what he could do in a private and intimate place.



I can argue that inviting him could pose a security threat also, given that most likely alcohol will be around.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    7














    You mention this person having harassed you and your wife on separate occasions. You are having a party for your new house (I imagine your wife will be present), you are inviting some people from work you have a good relation with, and you are doubting to invite that one bad person. How will your wife feel about that person being invited, you think, about inviting a harassing person into her own house? How will she react when she finds out you are even considering inviting that person? Why do you even care whether or not this is appropriate?






    share|improve this answer


























    • I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

      – Philbo
      17 hours ago











    • @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

      – Dominique
      16 hours ago






    • 3





      I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

      – V2Blast
      10 hours ago



















    4














    Just want to contribute my view. For me excluding one of your co-workers for a party is a bit demeaning. But because of the fact that one of your co-workers act rudely, because of the harassment that you are saying, then it is high time for him to be excluded in such occasions especially that you want it to be a pure fun get-together. Then if he confronts you for such action, then just tell him/her of his rudeness and make him/her realize it.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

      – V2Blast
      10 hours ago



















    2














    If I found out I was the only one not being asked to a party, I would definitely be upset (you may not care, but do we want to make it worse?).



    But when you mentioned that you get together in groups of 3-4, an idea came to my mind - Plan TWO parties. Invite 3 or 4 of your coworker friends to the first party, and then invite the remaining friends to the second party. You are still excluding the one coworker, but since you aren't inviting everyone to each party it would be less obvious, and more like the get-togethers that are already happening.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

      – V2Blast
      10 hours ago











    • I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

      – JMac
      6 hours ago











    • @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

      – ruakh
      3 hours ago











    • @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

      – JMac
      1 hour ago











    • @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

      – ruakh
      1 hour ago





















    1














    If it is not workplace related then you can invite whoever you want.



    But if it can somehow be seen as workplace related then this would constitute bullying by exclusion.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 4





      I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

      – Booga Roo
      22 hours ago






    • 3





      @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

      – solarflare
      22 hours ago






    • 1





      In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

      – Peter
      16 hours ago











    • @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

      – JMac
      6 hours ago











    • @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

      – solarflare
      4 hours ago



















    1














    Telling a personal story, it did happen to me that two coworkers did not invite me for their respective marriages, while inviting most people in the department.



    I did nothing about it. I have no quarrel with them, and those are particularly expensive parties, so I respect their right to invite whoever they want. In both cases, other people came to me and asked if I would be attending, to which I provided lame excuses. In both cases I did not confront them, despite I suspecting the invitations had been handed at the workplace while I was in vacation, but I thought of no way to ask about that which would not result in the person believing I wanted to invite myself.



    A party at your house could also be a subject of limited attendee's numbers. There's at least a finite number of chairs at your house. It could as well be your wife's party.



    In your case, you do have a reason to have issues with said colleague.



    My advice is that you should avoid to do this kind of party frequently. One party I'm not invited, I suck it up. If every week there's a party and I'm out, this crosses the border to what I believe I should tolerate.



    Then again, if you are not a manager now or in the near future, what could said person do? In my case there was nothing HR could or should do for me. You mention that HR did nothing about the harassment situation, maybe he has actually been adverted verbally or in written in private (as this things should be done), but you were not informed. Would receiving a warning pose a problem to you? If I was your manager, I'd follow the companies policies, but I would think no less of you for a misconduct of this kind.



    Consider as well to invite the person out of politeness, If someone I dislike is hosting an event, I'll likely be voluntarily out, maybe I'll show up late and leave early. Seems like your guy would not do this though.



    In a different note, remember to maintain friends outside the workplace! I strongly recommend having a social life that does not depend on coworkers. Imagine you get fired, would you be able to keep up attending parties with all the coworkers who are still at the same company? If you became their boss, wouldn't that unbalance the relationships? I'm saying that because if I moved to a new place, I would first throw a party with my non-coworker friends.






    share|improve this answer































      1














      That depends, how bad is the --




      The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife
      doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has
      to dominate every conversation.




      yeah, come on, you know the answer to this. You don't owe him anything. If I was one of your coworkers, I'd be upset if you invited him. Don't invite him.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




























        0














        It is your party, and therefore appropriate to invite only who you want to. If you don't invite him and he confronts you, tell him he was not invited because your wife specifically asked you not to invite him, due to his previous sexual harassment of her.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

          – V2Blast
          10 hours ago











        • If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

          – J. Chris Compton
          9 hours ago



















        0














        (1) Make invitations orally - no e-mail trail unless it is personal e-mails or texts.

        (2) Make it explicit who is invited and who is not, but you do not have to justify why or any details, not even about the harassment or anything - that is a separate issue.



        Example: "Hi Jane, I'm having a housewarming on XYZ, would you and yours be interested in attending? This is a private event with some other coworkers."



        === The Sexual Harassment is absolutely not related to this question, but I'd advise you to make sure you follow-up on that ===






        share|improve this answer































          0














          I don't necessarily agree that inviting the colleagues creates an obligation to invite all 8. As a person, I may invite any friends I wish to my parties, and clearly the one colleague is not my friend. The key here is that this party does not become a work event. I can have fun with people, but if I'm making the party about work, then it would not be appropriate to exclude only one work colleague.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

            – Noah Cristino
            6 hours ago











          • Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

            – R..
            2 hours ago










          protected by Community 6 hours ago



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














          14 Answers
          14






          active

          oldest

          votes








          14 Answers
          14






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          98















          Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?




          It's your party.



          That means you get to invite whoever you like and exclude whoever you choose.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 28





            And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

            – Peter M
            yesterday








          • 2





            It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

            – BriseFlots
            18 hours ago






          • 3





            Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

            – bornfromanegg
            16 hours ago








          • 4





            @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

            – Joe Strazzere
            14 hours ago






          • 5





            @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

            – JMac
            13 hours ago
















          98















          Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?




          It's your party.



          That means you get to invite whoever you like and exclude whoever you choose.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 28





            And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

            – Peter M
            yesterday








          • 2





            It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

            – BriseFlots
            18 hours ago






          • 3





            Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

            – bornfromanegg
            16 hours ago








          • 4





            @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

            – Joe Strazzere
            14 hours ago






          • 5





            @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

            – JMac
            13 hours ago














          98












          98








          98








          Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?




          It's your party.



          That means you get to invite whoever you like and exclude whoever you choose.






          share|improve this answer














          Would it be inappropriate to purposely exclude this guy?




          It's your party.



          That means you get to invite whoever you like and exclude whoever you choose.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Joe StrazzereJoe Strazzere

          244k1197131013




          244k1197131013








          • 28





            And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

            – Peter M
            yesterday








          • 2





            It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

            – BriseFlots
            18 hours ago






          • 3





            Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

            – bornfromanegg
            16 hours ago








          • 4





            @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

            – Joe Strazzere
            14 hours ago






          • 5





            @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

            – JMac
            13 hours ago














          • 28





            And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

            – Peter M
            yesterday








          • 2





            It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

            – BriseFlots
            18 hours ago






          • 3





            Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

            – bornfromanegg
            16 hours ago








          • 4





            @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

            – Joe Strazzere
            14 hours ago






          • 5





            @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

            – JMac
            13 hours ago








          28




          28





          And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

          – Peter M
          yesterday







          And he can cry if he wants to* (when the relationship with that co-worker sours even more) (*that song just popped into my head when I saw your comment)

          – Peter M
          yesterday






          2




          2





          It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

          – BriseFlots
          18 hours ago





          It's not because you get to decide who you invite to your party that it's appropriate to invite everyone but one person. These are two totally unrelated propositions.

          – BriseFlots
          18 hours ago




          3




          3





          Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

          – bornfromanegg
          16 hours ago







          Wow, cool. 'Cos I was hoping to invite my mistress to the party my wife has organised for me. Glad to hear that's not inappropriate. I mean, it's my party, right?

          – bornfromanegg
          16 hours ago






          4




          4





          @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

          – Joe Strazzere
          14 hours ago





          @PeterM - ...you would cry too if it happened to you. LOL! Now I can't get that song out of my head.

          – Joe Strazzere
          14 hours ago




          5




          5





          @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

          – JMac
          13 hours ago





          @BriseFlots That's exactly why it's appropriate. It's a personal party, not a work event. You can choose to invite whoever you want to your personal party, same as every personal party; and there's no real reason choosing some coworkers for a party in your personal time is a workplace issue. There could be social implications, just like every interaction with people, but from a workplace perspective, the party invitations alone are perfectly acceptable.

          – JMac
          13 hours ago













          87














          If you are all peers, it is simply very, very rude. It sounds like you may not care about that, since the person who you want to exclude deserves to be excluded.



          If you are a manager, then it gets problematic, rather than just rude. According to Alison at AskAManager, you are opening yourself up to legitimate charges of favoritism. If you are in HR, that could also be a problem (Another AskAManager link).



          If you are all peers, and you want to send a message as well as have a good time, then invite all but the one co-worker.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 112





            The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

            – dbeer
            yesterday






          • 46





            It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

            – Echox
            yesterday






          • 6





            @Echox very much yes.

            – thursdaysgeek
            yesterday






          • 34





            @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

            – HopelessN00b
            20 hours ago






          • 23





            @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

            – bornfromanegg
            17 hours ago
















          87














          If you are all peers, it is simply very, very rude. It sounds like you may not care about that, since the person who you want to exclude deserves to be excluded.



          If you are a manager, then it gets problematic, rather than just rude. According to Alison at AskAManager, you are opening yourself up to legitimate charges of favoritism. If you are in HR, that could also be a problem (Another AskAManager link).



          If you are all peers, and you want to send a message as well as have a good time, then invite all but the one co-worker.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 112





            The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

            – dbeer
            yesterday






          • 46





            It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

            – Echox
            yesterday






          • 6





            @Echox very much yes.

            – thursdaysgeek
            yesterday






          • 34





            @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

            – HopelessN00b
            20 hours ago






          • 23





            @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

            – bornfromanegg
            17 hours ago














          87












          87








          87







          If you are all peers, it is simply very, very rude. It sounds like you may not care about that, since the person who you want to exclude deserves to be excluded.



          If you are a manager, then it gets problematic, rather than just rude. According to Alison at AskAManager, you are opening yourself up to legitimate charges of favoritism. If you are in HR, that could also be a problem (Another AskAManager link).



          If you are all peers, and you want to send a message as well as have a good time, then invite all but the one co-worker.






          share|improve this answer













          If you are all peers, it is simply very, very rude. It sounds like you may not care about that, since the person who you want to exclude deserves to be excluded.



          If you are a manager, then it gets problematic, rather than just rude. According to Alison at AskAManager, you are opening yourself up to legitimate charges of favoritism. If you are in HR, that could also be a problem (Another AskAManager link).



          If you are all peers, and you want to send a message as well as have a good time, then invite all but the one co-worker.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          thursdaysgeekthursdaysgeek

          28.5k1351109




          28.5k1351109








          • 112





            The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

            – dbeer
            yesterday






          • 46





            It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

            – Echox
            yesterday






          • 6





            @Echox very much yes.

            – thursdaysgeek
            yesterday






          • 34





            @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

            – HopelessN00b
            20 hours ago






          • 23





            @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

            – bornfromanegg
            17 hours ago














          • 112





            The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

            – dbeer
            yesterday






          • 46





            It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

            – Echox
            yesterday






          • 6





            @Echox very much yes.

            – thursdaysgeek
            yesterday






          • 34





            @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

            – HopelessN00b
            20 hours ago






          • 23





            @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

            – bornfromanegg
            17 hours ago








          112




          112





          The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

          – dbeer
          yesterday





          The only think I'd change is that here it isn't rude; someone who has harassed you shouldn't expect to be invited anywhere.

          – dbeer
          yesterday




          46




          46





          It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

          – Echox
          yesterday





          It is rude but like it is rude to insult someone that just punched you, an insult is rude by definition. I think what @thursdaysgeek meant is just that the other employee will feel insulted by being the only one not invited, whether the OP cares about it is up to him.

          – Echox
          yesterday




          6




          6





          @Echox very much yes.

          – thursdaysgeek
          yesterday





          @Echox very much yes.

          – thursdaysgeek
          yesterday




          34




          34





          @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

          – HopelessN00b
          20 hours ago





          @Echox I disagree. It would be rude to draw attention to it (announcing something like everyone who isn’t a bigoted, sexually harassing asshole is invited to my house warming party), but simply excluding an unpleasant coworker from your social activities isn’t rude... it’s normal. In adult life, outside of an elementary school classroom, there’s just no obligation to include everyone or no one in a social activity - invite the people you want to invite, and any “socially well adjusted” adult is going to get that and not have a problem with it.

          – HopelessN00b
          20 hours ago




          23




          23





          @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

          – bornfromanegg
          17 hours ago





          @Battle The legitimate charges of favouritism bit only applies if the OP is a manager. But if the OP is a manager, has been sexually harassed by one of his coworkers, and hasn't done anything about it at work, then we have an entirely different question on our hands.

          – bornfromanegg
          17 hours ago











          48














          You're not inviting your co-workers, you're inviting your friends you happen to work with. That co-worker is not your friend, so you do not invite him.



          You may want to inform the invitees that he has not been invited. By your description, they'll probably be relieved, but at the very least they'll know to keep quiet about the invitation if necessary.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

            – rexkogitans
            13 hours ago






          • 7





            Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago











          • That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

            – Mazura
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

            – Tas
            4 hours ago
















          48














          You're not inviting your co-workers, you're inviting your friends you happen to work with. That co-worker is not your friend, so you do not invite him.



          You may want to inform the invitees that he has not been invited. By your description, they'll probably be relieved, but at the very least they'll know to keep quiet about the invitation if necessary.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

            – rexkogitans
            13 hours ago






          • 7





            Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago











          • That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

            – Mazura
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

            – Tas
            4 hours ago














          48












          48








          48







          You're not inviting your co-workers, you're inviting your friends you happen to work with. That co-worker is not your friend, so you do not invite him.



          You may want to inform the invitees that he has not been invited. By your description, they'll probably be relieved, but at the very least they'll know to keep quiet about the invitation if necessary.






          share|improve this answer













          You're not inviting your co-workers, you're inviting your friends you happen to work with. That co-worker is not your friend, so you do not invite him.



          You may want to inform the invitees that he has not been invited. By your description, they'll probably be relieved, but at the very least they'll know to keep quiet about the invitation if necessary.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 17 hours ago









          SQBSQB

          1,091715




          1,091715








          • 1





            +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

            – rexkogitans
            13 hours ago






          • 7





            Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago











          • That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

            – Mazura
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

            – Tas
            4 hours ago














          • 1





            +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

            – rexkogitans
            13 hours ago






          • 7





            Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago











          • That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

            – Mazura
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

            – Tas
            4 hours ago








          1




          1





          +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

          – rexkogitans
          13 hours ago





          +1 This! Work and private life should be separated - because of such things it is never a good idea to blur the edges.

          – rexkogitans
          13 hours ago




          7




          7





          Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

          – Jon Bentley
          12 hours ago





          Best answer IMO. The answers which suggest it is rude don't seem to be factoring in that we're talking about a party taking place at the OP's house

          – Jon Bentley
          12 hours ago













          That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

          – Mazura
          7 hours ago





          That's because for some reason the title says event. If there was an "event" at my house I'd have to call the cops or the FD.

          – Mazura
          7 hours ago




          1




          1





          While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

          – Tas
          4 hours ago





          While I do agree, I feel inviting 3 of 10 or 100 employees is definitely not rude yet inviting all but one (2 out of 3, 9 out of 10 etc) would still be considered rude. I think OP has good reason regardless, and shouldn't worry about it

          – Tas
          4 hours ago











          20














          Yes it would be rude, and the possible awkwardness is a risk that you would have to be willing to deal with.



          But of course, not inviting him is the right move to make. Him spoiling your party sounds like a far worse outcome.



          You just need to prepared for some perhaps passive-aggressive dynamics in the workplace - but I imagine this guy knows why he is being excluded.



          The other awkward scenario is that he directly confronts you why he wasn't invited, in which case you can give him an honest and direct answer.






          share|improve this answer
























          • From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago













          • @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

            – ruakh
            3 hours ago








          • 1





            @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

            – Jon Bentley
            2 hours ago











          • @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

            – ruakh
            2 hours ago








          • 1





            Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

            – R..
            2 hours ago
















          20














          Yes it would be rude, and the possible awkwardness is a risk that you would have to be willing to deal with.



          But of course, not inviting him is the right move to make. Him spoiling your party sounds like a far worse outcome.



          You just need to prepared for some perhaps passive-aggressive dynamics in the workplace - but I imagine this guy knows why he is being excluded.



          The other awkward scenario is that he directly confronts you why he wasn't invited, in which case you can give him an honest and direct answer.






          share|improve this answer
























          • From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago













          • @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

            – ruakh
            3 hours ago








          • 1





            @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

            – Jon Bentley
            2 hours ago











          • @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

            – ruakh
            2 hours ago








          • 1





            Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

            – R..
            2 hours ago














          20












          20








          20







          Yes it would be rude, and the possible awkwardness is a risk that you would have to be willing to deal with.



          But of course, not inviting him is the right move to make. Him spoiling your party sounds like a far worse outcome.



          You just need to prepared for some perhaps passive-aggressive dynamics in the workplace - but I imagine this guy knows why he is being excluded.



          The other awkward scenario is that he directly confronts you why he wasn't invited, in which case you can give him an honest and direct answer.






          share|improve this answer













          Yes it would be rude, and the possible awkwardness is a risk that you would have to be willing to deal with.



          But of course, not inviting him is the right move to make. Him spoiling your party sounds like a far worse outcome.



          You just need to prepared for some perhaps passive-aggressive dynamics in the workplace - but I imagine this guy knows why he is being excluded.



          The other awkward scenario is that he directly confronts you why he wasn't invited, in which case you can give him an honest and direct answer.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          dwjohnstondwjohnston

          1,186517




          1,186517













          • From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago













          • @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

            – ruakh
            3 hours ago








          • 1





            @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

            – Jon Bentley
            2 hours ago











          • @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

            – ruakh
            2 hours ago








          • 1





            Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

            – R..
            2 hours ago



















          • From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

            – Jon Bentley
            12 hours ago













          • @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

            – ruakh
            3 hours ago








          • 1





            @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

            – Jon Bentley
            2 hours ago











          • @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

            – ruakh
            2 hours ago








          • 1





            Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

            – R..
            2 hours ago

















          From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

          – Jon Bentley
          12 hours ago







          From reading other comments, there seems to be a significant % of people who find nothing rude about choosing who to invite or not invite to your own house (myself included). It may be useful therefore to expand a little on why you believe it would be rude.

          – Jon Bentley
          12 hours ago















          @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

          – ruakh
          3 hours ago







          @JonBentley: Imagine you're chatting in a group of eight friends, and a ninth friend comes up and gives a separate, personal "Hi, <name>!" to each individual person in your group . . . except you. Would you not feel snubbed? If they'd only given personal hellos to one or two people, it would feel positive with respect to those people; but by giving them to all but one person, it instead feels negative about that person -- you. If you cared about that friendship, you might even talk to them later to make sure you hadn't offended them in some way.

          – ruakh
          3 hours ago






          1




          1





          @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

          – Jon Bentley
          2 hours ago





          @ruakh It's the wrong analogy. In the OP's example we have two distinct but overlapping categories of people. The first is the OP's colleagues and the second is the OP's friends. If the scenario were the OP inviting their colleagues into the office kitchen to have a drink together, then I agree that it would be a snub to leave one person out. However here the OP is inviting their friends to their house - nobody should have any reasonable expectation of automatically being on the OP's list of friends merely because they work together.

          – Jon Bentley
          2 hours ago













          @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

          – ruakh
          2 hours ago







          @JonBentley: If the OP's list of "friends" includes every single coworker except one, then the obvious/natural interpretation is as a snub of that one. (And that interpretation seems to be correct: the OP's motivation for skipping that coworker is indeed that he's a problem, not that he just coincidentally happens to not be the OP's friend.)

          – ruakh
          2 hours ago






          1




          1





          Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

          – R..
          2 hours ago





          Excluding/disinviting abusers is never rude. -1

          – R..
          2 hours ago











          10














          YOUR house, YOUR rules.



          You're not forced to invite an unwanted person in your house around your loved ones (probably including children) who has previous records of misbehaving and sexual harrasement in a public place, let alone what he could do in a private and intimate place.



          I can argue that inviting him could pose a security threat also, given that most likely alcohol will be around.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























            10














            YOUR house, YOUR rules.



            You're not forced to invite an unwanted person in your house around your loved ones (probably including children) who has previous records of misbehaving and sexual harrasement in a public place, let alone what he could do in a private and intimate place.



            I can argue that inviting him could pose a security threat also, given that most likely alcohol will be around.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.























              10












              10








              10







              YOUR house, YOUR rules.



              You're not forced to invite an unwanted person in your house around your loved ones (probably including children) who has previous records of misbehaving and sexual harrasement in a public place, let alone what he could do in a private and intimate place.



              I can argue that inviting him could pose a security threat also, given that most likely alcohol will be around.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              YOUR house, YOUR rules.



              You're not forced to invite an unwanted person in your house around your loved ones (probably including children) who has previous records of misbehaving and sexual harrasement in a public place, let alone what he could do in a private and intimate place.



              I can argue that inviting him could pose a security threat also, given that most likely alcohol will be around.







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 13 hours ago









              TRiG

              155214




              155214






              New contributor




              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 18 hours ago









              inaliahgleinaliahgle

              364210




              364210




              New contributor




              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  7














                  You mention this person having harassed you and your wife on separate occasions. You are having a party for your new house (I imagine your wife will be present), you are inviting some people from work you have a good relation with, and you are doubting to invite that one bad person. How will your wife feel about that person being invited, you think, about inviting a harassing person into her own house? How will she react when she finds out you are even considering inviting that person? Why do you even care whether or not this is appropriate?






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                    – Philbo
                    17 hours ago











                  • @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                    – Dominique
                    16 hours ago






                  • 3





                    I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago
















                  7














                  You mention this person having harassed you and your wife on separate occasions. You are having a party for your new house (I imagine your wife will be present), you are inviting some people from work you have a good relation with, and you are doubting to invite that one bad person. How will your wife feel about that person being invited, you think, about inviting a harassing person into her own house? How will she react when she finds out you are even considering inviting that person? Why do you even care whether or not this is appropriate?






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                    – Philbo
                    17 hours ago











                  • @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                    – Dominique
                    16 hours ago






                  • 3





                    I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago














                  7












                  7








                  7







                  You mention this person having harassed you and your wife on separate occasions. You are having a party for your new house (I imagine your wife will be present), you are inviting some people from work you have a good relation with, and you are doubting to invite that one bad person. How will your wife feel about that person being invited, you think, about inviting a harassing person into her own house? How will she react when she finds out you are even considering inviting that person? Why do you even care whether or not this is appropriate?






                  share|improve this answer















                  You mention this person having harassed you and your wife on separate occasions. You are having a party for your new house (I imagine your wife will be present), you are inviting some people from work you have a good relation with, and you are doubting to invite that one bad person. How will your wife feel about that person being invited, you think, about inviting a harassing person into her own house? How will she react when she finds out you are even considering inviting that person? Why do you even care whether or not this is appropriate?







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 16 hours ago

























                  answered 17 hours ago









                  DominiqueDominique

                  1,037311




                  1,037311













                  • I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                    – Philbo
                    17 hours ago











                  • @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                    – Dominique
                    16 hours ago






                  • 3





                    I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago



















                  • I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                    – Philbo
                    17 hours ago











                  • @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                    – Dominique
                    16 hours ago






                  • 3





                    I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago

















                  I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                  – Philbo
                  17 hours ago





                  I agree with your first paragraph but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply by the second "I'm sorry, but I have the impression you're not telling the whole story." From what I can tell, the OP is just looking to make sure there's no workplace repurcussions from not inviting this one guy. That would explain why they've asked it here.

                  – Philbo
                  17 hours ago













                  @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                  – Dominique
                  16 hours ago





                  @Philbo: you're right. I've adapted my answer accordingly.

                  – Dominique
                  16 hours ago




                  3




                  3





                  I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago





                  I think this answer would be improved by clearly stating your response to OP's question, rather than merely asking rhetorical questions and leaving people to assume your implied conclusion.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago











                  4














                  Just want to contribute my view. For me excluding one of your co-workers for a party is a bit demeaning. But because of the fact that one of your co-workers act rudely, because of the harassment that you are saying, then it is high time for him to be excluded in such occasions especially that you want it to be a pure fun get-together. Then if he confronts you for such action, then just tell him/her of his rudeness and make him/her realize it.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago
















                  4














                  Just want to contribute my view. For me excluding one of your co-workers for a party is a bit demeaning. But because of the fact that one of your co-workers act rudely, because of the harassment that you are saying, then it is high time for him to be excluded in such occasions especially that you want it to be a pure fun get-together. Then if he confronts you for such action, then just tell him/her of his rudeness and make him/her realize it.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago














                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Just want to contribute my view. For me excluding one of your co-workers for a party is a bit demeaning. But because of the fact that one of your co-workers act rudely, because of the harassment that you are saying, then it is high time for him to be excluded in such occasions especially that you want it to be a pure fun get-together. Then if he confronts you for such action, then just tell him/her of his rudeness and make him/her realize it.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  Just want to contribute my view. For me excluding one of your co-workers for a party is a bit demeaning. But because of the fact that one of your co-workers act rudely, because of the harassment that you are saying, then it is high time for him to be excluded in such occasions especially that you want it to be a pure fun get-together. Then if he confronts you for such action, then just tell him/her of his rudeness and make him/her realize it.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 13 hours ago









                  user98006user98006

                  411




                  411




                  New contributor




                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  user98006 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.













                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago



















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago

















                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago





                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago











                  2














                  If I found out I was the only one not being asked to a party, I would definitely be upset (you may not care, but do we want to make it worse?).



                  But when you mentioned that you get together in groups of 3-4, an idea came to my mind - Plan TWO parties. Invite 3 or 4 of your coworker friends to the first party, and then invite the remaining friends to the second party. You are still excluding the one coworker, but since you aren't inviting everyone to each party it would be less obvious, and more like the get-togethers that are already happening.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago











                  • I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                    – ruakh
                    3 hours ago











                  • @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                    – JMac
                    1 hour ago











                  • @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                    – ruakh
                    1 hour ago


















                  2














                  If I found out I was the only one not being asked to a party, I would definitely be upset (you may not care, but do we want to make it worse?).



                  But when you mentioned that you get together in groups of 3-4, an idea came to my mind - Plan TWO parties. Invite 3 or 4 of your coworker friends to the first party, and then invite the remaining friends to the second party. You are still excluding the one coworker, but since you aren't inviting everyone to each party it would be less obvious, and more like the get-togethers that are already happening.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago











                  • I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                    – ruakh
                    3 hours ago











                  • @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                    – JMac
                    1 hour ago











                  • @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                    – ruakh
                    1 hour ago
















                  2












                  2








                  2







                  If I found out I was the only one not being asked to a party, I would definitely be upset (you may not care, but do we want to make it worse?).



                  But when you mentioned that you get together in groups of 3-4, an idea came to my mind - Plan TWO parties. Invite 3 or 4 of your coworker friends to the first party, and then invite the remaining friends to the second party. You are still excluding the one coworker, but since you aren't inviting everyone to each party it would be less obvious, and more like the get-togethers that are already happening.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  If I found out I was the only one not being asked to a party, I would definitely be upset (you may not care, but do we want to make it worse?).



                  But when you mentioned that you get together in groups of 3-4, an idea came to my mind - Plan TWO parties. Invite 3 or 4 of your coworker friends to the first party, and then invite the remaining friends to the second party. You are still excluding the one coworker, but since you aren't inviting everyone to each party it would be less obvious, and more like the get-togethers that are already happening.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 11 hours ago









                  Eugene StyerEugene Styer

                  1292




                  1292




                  New contributor




                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Eugene Styer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.













                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago











                  • I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                    – ruakh
                    3 hours ago











                  • @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                    – JMac
                    1 hour ago











                  • @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                    – ruakh
                    1 hour ago





















                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                    – V2Blast
                    10 hours ago











                  • I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                    – ruakh
                    3 hours ago











                  • @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                    – JMac
                    1 hour ago











                  • @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                    – ruakh
                    1 hour ago



















                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago





                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                  – V2Blast
                  10 hours ago













                  I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                  – JMac
                  6 hours ago





                  I don't see how this helps. Both parties are the same, OP is invited to neither, and everyone would be able to easily figure out that the two parties they were invited to in the same place at the same time are in fact the same party. I don't see the benefit of this compared to just inviting individuals to your party as you normally would. Not being a part of two groups could still make the coworker upset, possibly more so if they figure out it was the same party. Inviting individuals who you get along well with seems like it would be the same; but without having to act like 2 parties.

                  – JMac
                  6 hours ago













                  @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                  – ruakh
                  3 hours ago





                  @JMac: Where did you get "in the same place at the same time" from? This answer is literally suggesting having two separate dinner parties, presumably on different days or different weeks. It doesn't have to be the set-up for a sitcom. ;-)

                  – ruakh
                  3 hours ago













                  @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                  – JMac
                  1 hour ago





                  @ruakh Which is obviously still a poor solution that leaves OP having to break up his own party. I get the feeling you were kidding though anyways.

                  – JMac
                  1 hour ago













                  @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                  – ruakh
                  1 hour ago







                  @JMac: I think you must be confusing me with someone else. (In particular, please note that I did not write this answer.)

                  – ruakh
                  1 hour ago













                  1














                  If it is not workplace related then you can invite whoever you want.



                  But if it can somehow be seen as workplace related then this would constitute bullying by exclusion.






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 4





                    I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                    – Booga Roo
                    22 hours ago






                  • 3





                    @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                    – solarflare
                    22 hours ago






                  • 1





                    In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                    – Peter
                    16 hours ago











                  • @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                    – solarflare
                    4 hours ago
















                  1














                  If it is not workplace related then you can invite whoever you want.



                  But if it can somehow be seen as workplace related then this would constitute bullying by exclusion.






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 4





                    I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                    – Booga Roo
                    22 hours ago






                  • 3





                    @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                    – solarflare
                    22 hours ago






                  • 1





                    In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                    – Peter
                    16 hours ago











                  • @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                    – solarflare
                    4 hours ago














                  1












                  1








                  1







                  If it is not workplace related then you can invite whoever you want.



                  But if it can somehow be seen as workplace related then this would constitute bullying by exclusion.






                  share|improve this answer













                  If it is not workplace related then you can invite whoever you want.



                  But if it can somehow be seen as workplace related then this would constitute bullying by exclusion.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  solarflaresolarflare

                  6,04521333




                  6,04521333








                  • 4





                    I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                    – Booga Roo
                    22 hours ago






                  • 3





                    @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                    – solarflare
                    22 hours ago






                  • 1





                    In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                    – Peter
                    16 hours ago











                  • @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                    – solarflare
                    4 hours ago














                  • 4





                    I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                    – Booga Roo
                    22 hours ago






                  • 3





                    @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                    – solarflare
                    22 hours ago






                  • 1





                    In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                    – Peter
                    16 hours ago











                  • @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                    – JMac
                    6 hours ago











                  • @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                    – solarflare
                    4 hours ago








                  4




                  4





                  I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                  – Booga Roo
                  22 hours ago





                  I think you could bolster this answer with some examples of unacceptable exclusions. Perhaps exclusion from a company sports team, or department milestone celebration dinner, that sort of thing might count as improper.

                  – Booga Roo
                  22 hours ago




                  3




                  3





                  @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                  – solarflare
                  22 hours ago





                  @BoogaRoo the example used in training videos here is when you come into the office and you say hi to everyone but deliberately ignore one person, if it is repeated or obvious then it is bullying.

                  – solarflare
                  22 hours ago




                  1




                  1





                  In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                  – Peter
                  16 hours ago





                  In training examples, bullying is normally in a work-related context, such as not inviting a team member to a working lunch or excluding them from a planning meeting that everyone else attends. It is not about what happens in a personal context, such as inviting work-mates into your home for a house-warming.

                  – Peter
                  16 hours ago













                  @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                  – JMac
                  6 hours ago





                  @Peter I could see a grey area being when you invite everyone during work hours. The obvious solution would be to call/text/talk to them outside of work to invite them, therefore removing the possibility of making your coworker feel excluded from something work related and therefore "bullied".

                  – JMac
                  6 hours ago













                  @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                  – solarflare
                  4 hours ago





                  @Peter thats why I said "workplace related". If it is a personal activity then no one can dispute it. However for an external meeting to become a "workplace related activity" all it would take is people to start discussing work, then it becomes a work related meeting. OP is on thin ice with this one, the safest thing to do is invite everyone and be civil. (IMHO)

                  – solarflare
                  4 hours ago











                  1














                  Telling a personal story, it did happen to me that two coworkers did not invite me for their respective marriages, while inviting most people in the department.



                  I did nothing about it. I have no quarrel with them, and those are particularly expensive parties, so I respect their right to invite whoever they want. In both cases, other people came to me and asked if I would be attending, to which I provided lame excuses. In both cases I did not confront them, despite I suspecting the invitations had been handed at the workplace while I was in vacation, but I thought of no way to ask about that which would not result in the person believing I wanted to invite myself.



                  A party at your house could also be a subject of limited attendee's numbers. There's at least a finite number of chairs at your house. It could as well be your wife's party.



                  In your case, you do have a reason to have issues with said colleague.



                  My advice is that you should avoid to do this kind of party frequently. One party I'm not invited, I suck it up. If every week there's a party and I'm out, this crosses the border to what I believe I should tolerate.



                  Then again, if you are not a manager now or in the near future, what could said person do? In my case there was nothing HR could or should do for me. You mention that HR did nothing about the harassment situation, maybe he has actually been adverted verbally or in written in private (as this things should be done), but you were not informed. Would receiving a warning pose a problem to you? If I was your manager, I'd follow the companies policies, but I would think no less of you for a misconduct of this kind.



                  Consider as well to invite the person out of politeness, If someone I dislike is hosting an event, I'll likely be voluntarily out, maybe I'll show up late and leave early. Seems like your guy would not do this though.



                  In a different note, remember to maintain friends outside the workplace! I strongly recommend having a social life that does not depend on coworkers. Imagine you get fired, would you be able to keep up attending parties with all the coworkers who are still at the same company? If you became their boss, wouldn't that unbalance the relationships? I'm saying that because if I moved to a new place, I would first throw a party with my non-coworker friends.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    1














                    Telling a personal story, it did happen to me that two coworkers did not invite me for their respective marriages, while inviting most people in the department.



                    I did nothing about it. I have no quarrel with them, and those are particularly expensive parties, so I respect their right to invite whoever they want. In both cases, other people came to me and asked if I would be attending, to which I provided lame excuses. In both cases I did not confront them, despite I suspecting the invitations had been handed at the workplace while I was in vacation, but I thought of no way to ask about that which would not result in the person believing I wanted to invite myself.



                    A party at your house could also be a subject of limited attendee's numbers. There's at least a finite number of chairs at your house. It could as well be your wife's party.



                    In your case, you do have a reason to have issues with said colleague.



                    My advice is that you should avoid to do this kind of party frequently. One party I'm not invited, I suck it up. If every week there's a party and I'm out, this crosses the border to what I believe I should tolerate.



                    Then again, if you are not a manager now or in the near future, what could said person do? In my case there was nothing HR could or should do for me. You mention that HR did nothing about the harassment situation, maybe he has actually been adverted verbally or in written in private (as this things should be done), but you were not informed. Would receiving a warning pose a problem to you? If I was your manager, I'd follow the companies policies, but I would think no less of you for a misconduct of this kind.



                    Consider as well to invite the person out of politeness, If someone I dislike is hosting an event, I'll likely be voluntarily out, maybe I'll show up late and leave early. Seems like your guy would not do this though.



                    In a different note, remember to maintain friends outside the workplace! I strongly recommend having a social life that does not depend on coworkers. Imagine you get fired, would you be able to keep up attending parties with all the coworkers who are still at the same company? If you became their boss, wouldn't that unbalance the relationships? I'm saying that because if I moved to a new place, I would first throw a party with my non-coworker friends.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Telling a personal story, it did happen to me that two coworkers did not invite me for their respective marriages, while inviting most people in the department.



                      I did nothing about it. I have no quarrel with them, and those are particularly expensive parties, so I respect their right to invite whoever they want. In both cases, other people came to me and asked if I would be attending, to which I provided lame excuses. In both cases I did not confront them, despite I suspecting the invitations had been handed at the workplace while I was in vacation, but I thought of no way to ask about that which would not result in the person believing I wanted to invite myself.



                      A party at your house could also be a subject of limited attendee's numbers. There's at least a finite number of chairs at your house. It could as well be your wife's party.



                      In your case, you do have a reason to have issues with said colleague.



                      My advice is that you should avoid to do this kind of party frequently. One party I'm not invited, I suck it up. If every week there's a party and I'm out, this crosses the border to what I believe I should tolerate.



                      Then again, if you are not a manager now or in the near future, what could said person do? In my case there was nothing HR could or should do for me. You mention that HR did nothing about the harassment situation, maybe he has actually been adverted verbally or in written in private (as this things should be done), but you were not informed. Would receiving a warning pose a problem to you? If I was your manager, I'd follow the companies policies, but I would think no less of you for a misconduct of this kind.



                      Consider as well to invite the person out of politeness, If someone I dislike is hosting an event, I'll likely be voluntarily out, maybe I'll show up late and leave early. Seems like your guy would not do this though.



                      In a different note, remember to maintain friends outside the workplace! I strongly recommend having a social life that does not depend on coworkers. Imagine you get fired, would you be able to keep up attending parties with all the coworkers who are still at the same company? If you became their boss, wouldn't that unbalance the relationships? I'm saying that because if I moved to a new place, I would first throw a party with my non-coworker friends.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Telling a personal story, it did happen to me that two coworkers did not invite me for their respective marriages, while inviting most people in the department.



                      I did nothing about it. I have no quarrel with them, and those are particularly expensive parties, so I respect their right to invite whoever they want. In both cases, other people came to me and asked if I would be attending, to which I provided lame excuses. In both cases I did not confront them, despite I suspecting the invitations had been handed at the workplace while I was in vacation, but I thought of no way to ask about that which would not result in the person believing I wanted to invite myself.



                      A party at your house could also be a subject of limited attendee's numbers. There's at least a finite number of chairs at your house. It could as well be your wife's party.



                      In your case, you do have a reason to have issues with said colleague.



                      My advice is that you should avoid to do this kind of party frequently. One party I'm not invited, I suck it up. If every week there's a party and I'm out, this crosses the border to what I believe I should tolerate.



                      Then again, if you are not a manager now or in the near future, what could said person do? In my case there was nothing HR could or should do for me. You mention that HR did nothing about the harassment situation, maybe he has actually been adverted verbally or in written in private (as this things should be done), but you were not informed. Would receiving a warning pose a problem to you? If I was your manager, I'd follow the companies policies, but I would think no less of you for a misconduct of this kind.



                      Consider as well to invite the person out of politeness, If someone I dislike is hosting an event, I'll likely be voluntarily out, maybe I'll show up late and leave early. Seems like your guy would not do this though.



                      In a different note, remember to maintain friends outside the workplace! I strongly recommend having a social life that does not depend on coworkers. Imagine you get fired, would you be able to keep up attending parties with all the coworkers who are still at the same company? If you became their boss, wouldn't that unbalance the relationships? I'm saying that because if I moved to a new place, I would first throw a party with my non-coworker friends.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 8 hours ago









                      MefiticoMefitico

                      2218




                      2218























                          1














                          That depends, how bad is the --




                          The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife
                          doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has
                          to dominate every conversation.




                          yeah, come on, you know the answer to this. You don't owe him anything. If I was one of your coworkers, I'd be upset if you invited him. Don't invite him.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                            1














                            That depends, how bad is the --




                            The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife
                            doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has
                            to dominate every conversation.




                            yeah, come on, you know the answer to this. You don't owe him anything. If I was one of your coworkers, I'd be upset if you invited him. Don't invite him.






                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                              1












                              1








                              1







                              That depends, how bad is the --




                              The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife
                              doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has
                              to dominate every conversation.




                              yeah, come on, you know the answer to this. You don't owe him anything. If I was one of your coworkers, I'd be upset if you invited him. Don't invite him.






                              share|improve this answer








                              New contributor




                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.










                              That depends, how bad is the --




                              The other guy has sexually harassed me and my wife separately (my wife
                              doesn't work here), gets really drunk and says racist things, and has
                              to dominate every conversation.




                              yeah, come on, you know the answer to this. You don't owe him anything. If I was one of your coworkers, I'd be upset if you invited him. Don't invite him.







                              share|improve this answer








                              New contributor




                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer






                              New contributor




                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              answered 6 hours ago









                              DanielDaniel

                              1113




                              1113




                              New contributor




                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                              New contributor





                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                              Daniel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                  0














                                  It is your party, and therefore appropriate to invite only who you want to. If you don't invite him and he confronts you, tell him he was not invited because your wife specifically asked you not to invite him, due to his previous sexual harassment of her.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                    – V2Blast
                                    10 hours ago











                                  • If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                    – J. Chris Compton
                                    9 hours ago
















                                  0














                                  It is your party, and therefore appropriate to invite only who you want to. If you don't invite him and he confronts you, tell him he was not invited because your wife specifically asked you not to invite him, due to his previous sexual harassment of her.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                    – V2Blast
                                    10 hours ago











                                  • If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                    – J. Chris Compton
                                    9 hours ago














                                  0












                                  0








                                  0







                                  It is your party, and therefore appropriate to invite only who you want to. If you don't invite him and he confronts you, tell him he was not invited because your wife specifically asked you not to invite him, due to his previous sexual harassment of her.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                  It is your party, and therefore appropriate to invite only who you want to. If you don't invite him and he confronts you, tell him he was not invited because your wife specifically asked you not to invite him, due to his previous sexual harassment of her.







                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer






                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                  answered 10 hours ago









                                  Chris BradshawChris Bradshaw

                                  1




                                  1




                                  New contributor




                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                  New contributor





                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                  Chris Bradshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.













                                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                    – V2Blast
                                    10 hours ago











                                  • If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                    – J. Chris Compton
                                    9 hours ago



















                                  • Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                    – V2Blast
                                    10 hours ago











                                  • If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                    – J. Chris Compton
                                    9 hours ago

















                                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                  – V2Blast
                                  10 hours ago





                                  Welcome to the Workplace! Take the tour if you haven't already.

                                  – V2Blast
                                  10 hours ago













                                  If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                  – J. Chris Compton
                                  9 hours ago





                                  If it were me, and my wife were the reason I wasn't inviting someone, I wouldn't bring her into it. Either take the heat for it or because it is work give another (possibly transparent/flimsy) excuse like "We only had enough chairs for X people."

                                  – J. Chris Compton
                                  9 hours ago











                                  0














                                  (1) Make invitations orally - no e-mail trail unless it is personal e-mails or texts.

                                  (2) Make it explicit who is invited and who is not, but you do not have to justify why or any details, not even about the harassment or anything - that is a separate issue.



                                  Example: "Hi Jane, I'm having a housewarming on XYZ, would you and yours be interested in attending? This is a private event with some other coworkers."



                                  === The Sexual Harassment is absolutely not related to this question, but I'd advise you to make sure you follow-up on that ===






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    0














                                    (1) Make invitations orally - no e-mail trail unless it is personal e-mails or texts.

                                    (2) Make it explicit who is invited and who is not, but you do not have to justify why or any details, not even about the harassment or anything - that is a separate issue.



                                    Example: "Hi Jane, I'm having a housewarming on XYZ, would you and yours be interested in attending? This is a private event with some other coworkers."



                                    === The Sexual Harassment is absolutely not related to this question, but I'd advise you to make sure you follow-up on that ===






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      (1) Make invitations orally - no e-mail trail unless it is personal e-mails or texts.

                                      (2) Make it explicit who is invited and who is not, but you do not have to justify why or any details, not even about the harassment or anything - that is a separate issue.



                                      Example: "Hi Jane, I'm having a housewarming on XYZ, would you and yours be interested in attending? This is a private event with some other coworkers."



                                      === The Sexual Harassment is absolutely not related to this question, but I'd advise you to make sure you follow-up on that ===






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      (1) Make invitations orally - no e-mail trail unless it is personal e-mails or texts.

                                      (2) Make it explicit who is invited and who is not, but you do not have to justify why or any details, not even about the harassment or anything - that is a separate issue.



                                      Example: "Hi Jane, I'm having a housewarming on XYZ, would you and yours be interested in attending? This is a private event with some other coworkers."



                                      === The Sexual Harassment is absolutely not related to this question, but I'd advise you to make sure you follow-up on that ===







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 10 hours ago









                                      MikeyMikey

                                      26717




                                      26717























                                          0














                                          I don't necessarily agree that inviting the colleagues creates an obligation to invite all 8. As a person, I may invite any friends I wish to my parties, and clearly the one colleague is not my friend. The key here is that this party does not become a work event. I can have fun with people, but if I'm making the party about work, then it would not be appropriate to exclude only one work colleague.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                          • Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                            – Noah Cristino
                                            6 hours ago











                                          • Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                            – R..
                                            2 hours ago
















                                          0














                                          I don't necessarily agree that inviting the colleagues creates an obligation to invite all 8. As a person, I may invite any friends I wish to my parties, and clearly the one colleague is not my friend. The key here is that this party does not become a work event. I can have fun with people, but if I'm making the party about work, then it would not be appropriate to exclude only one work colleague.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                          • Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                            – Noah Cristino
                                            6 hours ago











                                          • Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                            – R..
                                            2 hours ago














                                          0












                                          0








                                          0







                                          I don't necessarily agree that inviting the colleagues creates an obligation to invite all 8. As a person, I may invite any friends I wish to my parties, and clearly the one colleague is not my friend. The key here is that this party does not become a work event. I can have fun with people, but if I'm making the party about work, then it would not be appropriate to exclude only one work colleague.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          I don't necessarily agree that inviting the colleagues creates an obligation to invite all 8. As a person, I may invite any friends I wish to my parties, and clearly the one colleague is not my friend. The key here is that this party does not become a work event. I can have fun with people, but if I'm making the party about work, then it would not be appropriate to exclude only one work colleague.







                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer






                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          answered 8 hours ago









                                          user45266user45266

                                          1012




                                          1012




                                          New contributor




                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                          New contributor





                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                          user45266 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          • Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                            – Noah Cristino
                                            6 hours ago











                                          • Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                            – R..
                                            2 hours ago



















                                          • Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                            – Noah Cristino
                                            6 hours ago











                                          • Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                            – R..
                                            2 hours ago

















                                          Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                          – Noah Cristino
                                          6 hours ago





                                          Yeah, just invite some non-work people and it won't be thought of as a "work event"

                                          – Noah Cristino
                                          6 hours ago













                                          Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                          – R..
                                          2 hours ago





                                          Even if it were about work, it would be appropriate to exclude this person. They should not be present in the workplace either. They should have been fired a long time ago.

                                          – R..
                                          2 hours ago





                                          protected by Community 6 hours ago



                                          Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Lallio

                                          Futebolista

                                          Jornalista