Registering ApplicationDbContext with hierarchical lifetime manager
I'm starting from an out-of-the-box MVC5 installation and Unity as an IoC container.
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework;
using Microsoft.Owin.Security;
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Web;
using DemoAPI.Repository;
using DemoMVC.Controllers;
using DemoMVC.Models;
using Unity;
using Unity.AspNet.Mvc;
using Unity.Injection;
using Unity.Lifetime;
namespace DemoMVC
{
/// <summary>
/// Specifies the Unity configuration for the main container.
/// </summary>
public static class UnityConfig
{
#region Unity Container
private static Lazy<IUnityContainer> container =
new Lazy<IUnityContainer>(() =>
{
var container = new UnityContainer();
RegisterTypes(container);
return container;
});
/// <summary>
/// Configured Unity Container.
/// </summary>
public static IUnityContainer Container => container.Value;
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Registers the type mappings with the Unity container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="container">The unity container to configure.</param>
/// <remarks>
/// There is no need to register concrete types such as controllers or
/// API controllers (unless you want to change the defaults), as Unity
/// allows resolving a concrete type even if it was not previously
/// registered.
/// </remarks>
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
container.RegisterType<IRepository, DemoRepository>();
#region OWIN
container.RegisterType<AccountController>(new InjectionConstructor());
container.RegisterType<DbContext, ApplicationDbContext>(new HierarchicalLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IUserStore<ApplicationUser>,
UserStore<ApplicationUser>>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<ApplicationUserManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IAuthenticationManager>(
new InjectionFactory(c => HttpContext.Current.GetOwinContext().Authentication));
container.RegisterType<ApplicationSignInManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
#endregion
}
}
}
I have one major worry here: Registering ApplicationDbContext with hierarchical lifetime manager. Manually registering DbContext and using this instance when registering the rest of the types - seems fishy to use the same eternal db context for ALL requests. However, per request makes even less sense for me, as it seems a huge waste of resources to instantiate dbContext per every request.
Is there another/better way to do this that I might be missing? I tried looking up the docs for unity and particularly lifetime managers, but everything I could find seems fairly outdated.
c# entity-framework asp.net-mvc-5 owin unity-container
add a comment |
I'm starting from an out-of-the-box MVC5 installation and Unity as an IoC container.
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework;
using Microsoft.Owin.Security;
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Web;
using DemoAPI.Repository;
using DemoMVC.Controllers;
using DemoMVC.Models;
using Unity;
using Unity.AspNet.Mvc;
using Unity.Injection;
using Unity.Lifetime;
namespace DemoMVC
{
/// <summary>
/// Specifies the Unity configuration for the main container.
/// </summary>
public static class UnityConfig
{
#region Unity Container
private static Lazy<IUnityContainer> container =
new Lazy<IUnityContainer>(() =>
{
var container = new UnityContainer();
RegisterTypes(container);
return container;
});
/// <summary>
/// Configured Unity Container.
/// </summary>
public static IUnityContainer Container => container.Value;
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Registers the type mappings with the Unity container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="container">The unity container to configure.</param>
/// <remarks>
/// There is no need to register concrete types such as controllers or
/// API controllers (unless you want to change the defaults), as Unity
/// allows resolving a concrete type even if it was not previously
/// registered.
/// </remarks>
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
container.RegisterType<IRepository, DemoRepository>();
#region OWIN
container.RegisterType<AccountController>(new InjectionConstructor());
container.RegisterType<DbContext, ApplicationDbContext>(new HierarchicalLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IUserStore<ApplicationUser>,
UserStore<ApplicationUser>>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<ApplicationUserManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IAuthenticationManager>(
new InjectionFactory(c => HttpContext.Current.GetOwinContext().Authentication));
container.RegisterType<ApplicationSignInManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
#endregion
}
}
}
I have one major worry here: Registering ApplicationDbContext with hierarchical lifetime manager. Manually registering DbContext and using this instance when registering the rest of the types - seems fishy to use the same eternal db context for ALL requests. However, per request makes even less sense for me, as it seems a huge waste of resources to instantiate dbContext per every request.
Is there another/better way to do this that I might be missing? I tried looking up the docs for unity and particularly lifetime managers, but everything I could find seems fairly outdated.
c# entity-framework asp.net-mvc-5 owin unity-container
1
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47
add a comment |
I'm starting from an out-of-the-box MVC5 installation and Unity as an IoC container.
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework;
using Microsoft.Owin.Security;
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Web;
using DemoAPI.Repository;
using DemoMVC.Controllers;
using DemoMVC.Models;
using Unity;
using Unity.AspNet.Mvc;
using Unity.Injection;
using Unity.Lifetime;
namespace DemoMVC
{
/// <summary>
/// Specifies the Unity configuration for the main container.
/// </summary>
public static class UnityConfig
{
#region Unity Container
private static Lazy<IUnityContainer> container =
new Lazy<IUnityContainer>(() =>
{
var container = new UnityContainer();
RegisterTypes(container);
return container;
});
/// <summary>
/// Configured Unity Container.
/// </summary>
public static IUnityContainer Container => container.Value;
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Registers the type mappings with the Unity container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="container">The unity container to configure.</param>
/// <remarks>
/// There is no need to register concrete types such as controllers or
/// API controllers (unless you want to change the defaults), as Unity
/// allows resolving a concrete type even if it was not previously
/// registered.
/// </remarks>
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
container.RegisterType<IRepository, DemoRepository>();
#region OWIN
container.RegisterType<AccountController>(new InjectionConstructor());
container.RegisterType<DbContext, ApplicationDbContext>(new HierarchicalLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IUserStore<ApplicationUser>,
UserStore<ApplicationUser>>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<ApplicationUserManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IAuthenticationManager>(
new InjectionFactory(c => HttpContext.Current.GetOwinContext().Authentication));
container.RegisterType<ApplicationSignInManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
#endregion
}
}
}
I have one major worry here: Registering ApplicationDbContext with hierarchical lifetime manager. Manually registering DbContext and using this instance when registering the rest of the types - seems fishy to use the same eternal db context for ALL requests. However, per request makes even less sense for me, as it seems a huge waste of resources to instantiate dbContext per every request.
Is there another/better way to do this that I might be missing? I tried looking up the docs for unity and particularly lifetime managers, but everything I could find seems fairly outdated.
c# entity-framework asp.net-mvc-5 owin unity-container
I'm starting from an out-of-the-box MVC5 installation and Unity as an IoC container.
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework;
using Microsoft.Owin.Security;
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Web;
using DemoAPI.Repository;
using DemoMVC.Controllers;
using DemoMVC.Models;
using Unity;
using Unity.AspNet.Mvc;
using Unity.Injection;
using Unity.Lifetime;
namespace DemoMVC
{
/// <summary>
/// Specifies the Unity configuration for the main container.
/// </summary>
public static class UnityConfig
{
#region Unity Container
private static Lazy<IUnityContainer> container =
new Lazy<IUnityContainer>(() =>
{
var container = new UnityContainer();
RegisterTypes(container);
return container;
});
/// <summary>
/// Configured Unity Container.
/// </summary>
public static IUnityContainer Container => container.Value;
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Registers the type mappings with the Unity container.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="container">The unity container to configure.</param>
/// <remarks>
/// There is no need to register concrete types such as controllers or
/// API controllers (unless you want to change the defaults), as Unity
/// allows resolving a concrete type even if it was not previously
/// registered.
/// </remarks>
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
container.RegisterType<IRepository, DemoRepository>();
#region OWIN
container.RegisterType<AccountController>(new InjectionConstructor());
container.RegisterType<DbContext, ApplicationDbContext>(new HierarchicalLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IUserStore<ApplicationUser>,
UserStore<ApplicationUser>>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<ApplicationUserManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
container.RegisterType<IAuthenticationManager>(
new InjectionFactory(c => HttpContext.Current.GetOwinContext().Authentication));
container.RegisterType<ApplicationSignInManager>(new PerRequestLifetimeManager());
#endregion
}
}
}
I have one major worry here: Registering ApplicationDbContext with hierarchical lifetime manager. Manually registering DbContext and using this instance when registering the rest of the types - seems fishy to use the same eternal db context for ALL requests. However, per request makes even less sense for me, as it seems a huge waste of resources to instantiate dbContext per every request.
Is there another/better way to do this that I might be missing? I tried looking up the docs for unity and particularly lifetime managers, but everything I could find seems fairly outdated.
c# entity-framework asp.net-mvc-5 owin unity-container
c# entity-framework asp.net-mvc-5 owin unity-container
asked Nov 22 at 23:59
Milos Milosavljevic
629
629
1
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47
add a comment |
1
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47
1
1
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53439246%2fregistering-applicationdbcontext-with-hierarchical-lifetime-manager%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53439246%2fregistering-applicationdbcontext-with-hierarchical-lifetime-manager%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Why creating a new instance of the context for each request would be a waste? FYI, this is what ASP.NET Core does out of the box, and it works quite great. Also, if you are worried about out of date stuff, leave MVC 5 behind
– Camilo Terevinto
Nov 23 at 0:47