Drawing an off-axis parabolic mirror in pst-optexp and pst-optic
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Having looked through the pst-optexp manual, it doesn't seem that there is a built-in off-axis parabolic mirror. I'm trying to make a diagram of a lab setup that goes like this:
Collimated beam falls on a converging lens.
The focal point of the lens is at the same point as the focal point of the OAP.
OAP reflects a collimated beam at a 90 degree angle to the incident beam.
pstricks pst-optexp
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Having looked through the pst-optexp manual, it doesn't seem that there is a built-in off-axis parabolic mirror. I'm trying to make a diagram of a lab setup that goes like this:
Collimated beam falls on a converging lens.
The focal point of the lens is at the same point as the focal point of the OAP.
OAP reflects a collimated beam at a 90 degree angle to the incident beam.
pstricks pst-optexp
1
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Having looked through the pst-optexp manual, it doesn't seem that there is a built-in off-axis parabolic mirror. I'm trying to make a diagram of a lab setup that goes like this:
Collimated beam falls on a converging lens.
The focal point of the lens is at the same point as the focal point of the OAP.
OAP reflects a collimated beam at a 90 degree angle to the incident beam.
pstricks pst-optexp
Having looked through the pst-optexp manual, it doesn't seem that there is a built-in off-axis parabolic mirror. I'm trying to make a diagram of a lab setup that goes like this:
Collimated beam falls on a converging lens.
The focal point of the lens is at the same point as the focal point of the OAP.
OAP reflects a collimated beam at a 90 degree angle to the incident beam.
pstricks pst-optexp
pstricks pst-optexp
asked Oct 2 '14 at 17:22
zmitchell
161
161
1
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19
add a comment |
1
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19
1
1
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Version 5.1 of pst-optexp
contains an off-axis parabolic mirror as oapmirror
. You must specify three nodes to align the mirror properly: the input nodes, the center node, where the actual mirror center is placed, and the focal point.
Here is an example for a mirror which reflects by 90°:
documentclass[margin=5pt, pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-optexp}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}(5,4)
pnodes(5,0.5){In}(1,0.5){C}(1,2){Focus}(1,4){Out}
addtopsstyle{Beam}{fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=green!40!white}
begin{optexp}
oapmirror(In)(C)(Focus)
lens[n=1.53](Focus)(Out)
drawwidebeam[beamwidth=0.5](In){-}(Out)
drawbeam[ArrowInside=->, ArrowInsidePos=0.2, arrowscale=3, arrowinset=0.3, linestyle=none](In){1}
end{optexp}
psdot(Focus)uput[0](Focus){focus}
end{pspicture}
end{document}
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
is there a bug related to oapmirror
? I've been trying to draw one in my experimental setup sketch without success. In fact, I tried to compile the code from Christoph and it didn't work.
New contributor
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Version 5.1 of pst-optexp
contains an off-axis parabolic mirror as oapmirror
. You must specify three nodes to align the mirror properly: the input nodes, the center node, where the actual mirror center is placed, and the focal point.
Here is an example for a mirror which reflects by 90°:
documentclass[margin=5pt, pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-optexp}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}(5,4)
pnodes(5,0.5){In}(1,0.5){C}(1,2){Focus}(1,4){Out}
addtopsstyle{Beam}{fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=green!40!white}
begin{optexp}
oapmirror(In)(C)(Focus)
lens[n=1.53](Focus)(Out)
drawwidebeam[beamwidth=0.5](In){-}(Out)
drawbeam[ArrowInside=->, ArrowInsidePos=0.2, arrowscale=3, arrowinset=0.3, linestyle=none](In){1}
end{optexp}
psdot(Focus)uput[0](Focus){focus}
end{pspicture}
end{document}
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Version 5.1 of pst-optexp
contains an off-axis parabolic mirror as oapmirror
. You must specify three nodes to align the mirror properly: the input nodes, the center node, where the actual mirror center is placed, and the focal point.
Here is an example for a mirror which reflects by 90°:
documentclass[margin=5pt, pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-optexp}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}(5,4)
pnodes(5,0.5){In}(1,0.5){C}(1,2){Focus}(1,4){Out}
addtopsstyle{Beam}{fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=green!40!white}
begin{optexp}
oapmirror(In)(C)(Focus)
lens[n=1.53](Focus)(Out)
drawwidebeam[beamwidth=0.5](In){-}(Out)
drawbeam[ArrowInside=->, ArrowInsidePos=0.2, arrowscale=3, arrowinset=0.3, linestyle=none](In){1}
end{optexp}
psdot(Focus)uput[0](Focus){focus}
end{pspicture}
end{document}
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Version 5.1 of pst-optexp
contains an off-axis parabolic mirror as oapmirror
. You must specify three nodes to align the mirror properly: the input nodes, the center node, where the actual mirror center is placed, and the focal point.
Here is an example for a mirror which reflects by 90°:
documentclass[margin=5pt, pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-optexp}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}(5,4)
pnodes(5,0.5){In}(1,0.5){C}(1,2){Focus}(1,4){Out}
addtopsstyle{Beam}{fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=green!40!white}
begin{optexp}
oapmirror(In)(C)(Focus)
lens[n=1.53](Focus)(Out)
drawwidebeam[beamwidth=0.5](In){-}(Out)
drawbeam[ArrowInside=->, ArrowInsidePos=0.2, arrowscale=3, arrowinset=0.3, linestyle=none](In){1}
end{optexp}
psdot(Focus)uput[0](Focus){focus}
end{pspicture}
end{document}
Version 5.1 of pst-optexp
contains an off-axis parabolic mirror as oapmirror
. You must specify three nodes to align the mirror properly: the input nodes, the center node, where the actual mirror center is placed, and the focal point.
Here is an example for a mirror which reflects by 90°:
documentclass[margin=5pt, pstricks]{standalone}
usepackage{pst-optexp}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}(5,4)
pnodes(5,0.5){In}(1,0.5){C}(1,2){Focus}(1,4){Out}
addtopsstyle{Beam}{fillstyle=solid,fillcolor=green!40!white}
begin{optexp}
oapmirror(In)(C)(Focus)
lens[n=1.53](Focus)(Out)
drawwidebeam[beamwidth=0.5](In){-}(Out)
drawbeam[ArrowInside=->, ArrowInsidePos=0.2, arrowscale=3, arrowinset=0.3, linestyle=none](In){1}
end{optexp}
psdot(Focus)uput[0](Focus){focus}
end{pspicture}
end{document}
edited Nov 20 '14 at 22:28
answered Oct 3 '14 at 13:01
Christoph
15.9k11444
15.9k11444
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
add a comment |
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
The other parameters for an OAP that would make sense would be the reflected focal length and the angle at which the reflected beam exits. From what I understand, that angle is 90 degrees in most cases (like what your solution shows here), but they are definitely also made with different exit angles. Here's a link to the specific model I'm using in my lab. On the right side of the page you can download the datasheets (one is a PDF) and look at all of the parameters: thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=MPD254254-90-F01
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:22
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
is there a bug related to oapmirror
? I've been trying to draw one in my experimental setup sketch without success. In fact, I tried to compile the code from Christoph and it didn't work.
New contributor
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
is there a bug related to oapmirror
? I've been trying to draw one in my experimental setup sketch without success. In fact, I tried to compile the code from Christoph and it didn't work.
New contributor
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
is there a bug related to oapmirror
? I've been trying to draw one in my experimental setup sketch without success. In fact, I tried to compile the code from Christoph and it didn't work.
New contributor
is there a bug related to oapmirror
? I've been trying to draw one in my experimental setup sketch without success. In fact, I tried to compile the code from Christoph and it didn't work.
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Kurt
34.1k846156
34.1k846156
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
Ludwig Regalado
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
1
1
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
Indeed, I couldn't make it work either. But not many people will see your question here. You'll stand better chances to get an answer if you ask a new question.
– Phelype Oleinik
2 hours ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
If you have a new question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. Include a link to this question if it helps provide context. - From Review
– naphaneal
48 mins ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204266%2fdrawing-an-off-axis-parabolic-mirror-in-pst-optexp-and-pst-optic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to TeX-SX. Can you tell us more about this thing since we are not all optics people. Best is to draw on a paper or on Paint and upload the picture to the question by editing it.
– percusse
Oct 2 '14 at 17:56
Have you tried using my solution? If you're having problems with it, I would be glad to here about it in order to get some feedback about this feature before integrating it in the main release :)
– Christoph
Oct 28 '14 at 10:51
@Christoph - Geez, I totally missed all of the replies to this post. I'll try implementing your solution over the weekend. percusse - An off-axis parabolic mirror is a mirror whose reflective surface is in the shape of a piece of a parabolic surface instead of a piece of a spherical surface. These are nice because they don't exhibit spherical abberations.
– zmitchell
Nov 18 '14 at 17:19