Cabralia

Multi tool use
Cabralia
|
|
Classificação científica
|
Reino:
|
Animalia
|
Filo:
|
Arthropoda
|
Classe:
|
Insecta
|
Ordem:
|
Lepidoptera
|
Família:
|
Arctiidae
|
Género:
|
Cabralia
|
|
Espécies
|
Ver texto
|
Cabralia é um gênero de traça pertencente à família Arctiidae.[1]
Referências
↑ «Zipcodezoo». Cabralia (em inglês). Consultado em 21 de agosto de 2010
Bibliografia |
- Bates DL, Fenton MB (1990) Aposematism or startle? Predators learn their responses to the defenses of prey. Can J Zool 68:49–52
- Dunning DC, Krüger M (1995) Aposematic sounds in African moths. Biotropica 27:227–231
- Dunning DC, Acharya L, Merriman CB, Ferro LD (1992) Interactions between bats and arctiid moths. Can J Zool 70:2218–2223
- Fullard JH, Fenton MB, Simmons JA (1979) Jamming bat echolocation: the clicks of arctiid moths. Can J Zool 57:647–649
- William Conner (ed.). (2009). Tiger moths and woolly bears : behavior, ecology, and evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford University Press: New York. ISBN 9780195327373
Ligações externas |
- Natural History Museum - Lepidoptera - catálogo de nomes genéricos
 |
Este artigo sobre lepidópteros, integrado no Projeto Artrópodes é um esboço. Você pode ajudar a Wikipédia expandindo-o. |
VfpO,n,BUdRcs1WR,YD7frMUyz5F,Lkk gyi FlW 7ess
Popular posts from this blog
0
I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
1
In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results?
python scikit-learn cross-validation
share | improve this question
edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52
desertnaut
20.3k 7 43 79
...
0
I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...