Using tensorflow dataset with stratified sampling
Given a tensorflow dataset
Train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((Train_Image_Filenames,Train_Image_Labels))
Train_dataset = Train_dataset.map(Parse_JPEG_Augmented)
...
I would like to stratify my batches to deal with class imbalance. I found tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample and thought I could use it in the following way:
Train_dataset_iter = Train_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch = Train_dataset_iter.get_next()
Train_Stratified_Images,Train_Stratified_Labels = tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample(Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch,[1/Classes]*Classes,Batch_Size)
But it gives the following error and I'm not sure that this would allow me to keep the performance benefits of tensorflow dataset as I may have then have to pass Train_Stratified_Images and Train_Stratified_Labels via feed_dict ?
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/contrib/training/python/training/sampling_ops.py", line 192, in stratified_sample
with ops.name_scope(name, 'stratified_sample', list(tensors) + [labels]):
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/ops.py", line 459, in __iter__
"Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is "
TypeError: Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is enabled. To iterate over this tensor use tf.map_fn.
What would be the "best practice" way of using dataset with stratified batches?
tensorflow
add a comment |
Given a tensorflow dataset
Train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((Train_Image_Filenames,Train_Image_Labels))
Train_dataset = Train_dataset.map(Parse_JPEG_Augmented)
...
I would like to stratify my batches to deal with class imbalance. I found tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample and thought I could use it in the following way:
Train_dataset_iter = Train_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch = Train_dataset_iter.get_next()
Train_Stratified_Images,Train_Stratified_Labels = tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample(Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch,[1/Classes]*Classes,Batch_Size)
But it gives the following error and I'm not sure that this would allow me to keep the performance benefits of tensorflow dataset as I may have then have to pass Train_Stratified_Images and Train_Stratified_Labels via feed_dict ?
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/contrib/training/python/training/sampling_ops.py", line 192, in stratified_sample
with ops.name_scope(name, 'stratified_sample', list(tensors) + [labels]):
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/ops.py", line 459, in __iter__
"Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is "
TypeError: Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is enabled. To iterate over this tensor use tf.map_fn.
What would be the "best practice" way of using dataset with stratified batches?
tensorflow
add a comment |
Given a tensorflow dataset
Train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((Train_Image_Filenames,Train_Image_Labels))
Train_dataset = Train_dataset.map(Parse_JPEG_Augmented)
...
I would like to stratify my batches to deal with class imbalance. I found tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample and thought I could use it in the following way:
Train_dataset_iter = Train_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch = Train_dataset_iter.get_next()
Train_Stratified_Images,Train_Stratified_Labels = tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample(Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch,[1/Classes]*Classes,Batch_Size)
But it gives the following error and I'm not sure that this would allow me to keep the performance benefits of tensorflow dataset as I may have then have to pass Train_Stratified_Images and Train_Stratified_Labels via feed_dict ?
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/contrib/training/python/training/sampling_ops.py", line 192, in stratified_sample
with ops.name_scope(name, 'stratified_sample', list(tensors) + [labels]):
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/ops.py", line 459, in __iter__
"Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is "
TypeError: Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is enabled. To iterate over this tensor use tf.map_fn.
What would be the "best practice" way of using dataset with stratified batches?
tensorflow
Given a tensorflow dataset
Train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((Train_Image_Filenames,Train_Image_Labels))
Train_dataset = Train_dataset.map(Parse_JPEG_Augmented)
...
I would like to stratify my batches to deal with class imbalance. I found tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample and thought I could use it in the following way:
Train_dataset_iter = Train_dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch = Train_dataset_iter.get_next()
Train_Stratified_Images,Train_Stratified_Labels = tf.contrib.training.stratified_sample(Train_dataset_Image_Batch,Train_dataset_Label_Batch,[1/Classes]*Classes,Batch_Size)
But it gives the following error and I'm not sure that this would allow me to keep the performance benefits of tensorflow dataset as I may have then have to pass Train_Stratified_Images and Train_Stratified_Labels via feed_dict ?
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/contrib/training/python/training/sampling_ops.py", line 192, in stratified_sample
with ops.name_scope(name, 'stratified_sample', list(tensors) + [labels]):
File "/xxx/xxx/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/ops.py", line 459, in __iter__
"Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is "
TypeError: Tensor objects are only iterable when eager execution is enabled. To iterate over this tensor use tf.map_fn.
What would be the "best practice" way of using dataset with stratified batches?
tensorflow
tensorflow
asked Nov 27 '18 at 17:34
AgadeAgade
789
789
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I am looking into a similar issue and I found this. I haven't tried it in my pipeline though. Maybe it will work for your purpose?
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53505150%2fusing-tensorflow-dataset-with-stratified-sampling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I am looking into a similar issue and I found this. I haven't tried it in my pipeline though. Maybe it will work for your purpose?
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
add a comment |
I am looking into a similar issue and I found this. I haven't tried it in my pipeline though. Maybe it will work for your purpose?
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
add a comment |
I am looking into a similar issue and I found this. I haven't tried it in my pipeline though. Maybe it will work for your purpose?
I am looking into a similar issue and I found this. I haven't tried it in my pipeline though. Maybe it will work for your purpose?
answered Dec 6 '18 at 23:47
NeergaardNeergaard
14413
14413
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
add a comment |
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
I found that rejection_resample is indeed the recommended way on similar topics. For my purposes I instead used the newer sample_from_datasets applied to a list of shuffled datasets for each class.
– Agade
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53505150%2fusing-tensorflow-dataset-with-stratified-sampling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown