Issues extending an XSD schema with any elements












0














I have an application that tries to validate the following XML:



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<cnt:agenda xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ppp:contactsv2 contactsv2.xsd urn:ppp:contacts contacts.xsd ">
<cnt:entry>
<cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
</cnt:entry>
<cnt:entry>
<cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
<cnt2:personal-info>
<cnt2:genre>male</cnt2:genre>
<cnt2:age>30</cnt2:age>
</cnt2:personal-info>
</cnt:entry>
</cnt:agenda>


In order to fulfill that, I have these two XSD schemas:



contacts.xsd



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema
targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contacts"
xmlns="urn:ppp:contacts"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

<xs:element name="agenda">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="entry" type="entry-type"/>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

<xs:complexType name="entry-type">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="number" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>


and contactsv2.xsd



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

<xs:import namespace="urn:ppp:contacts" schemaLocation="contacts.xsd"/>

<!-- Child of entry element -->
<xs:element name="personal-info"
type="cnt2:personal-infoType" />

<xs:complexType name="personal-infoType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="genre"
type="xs:string" />
<xs:element name="age" type="xs:unsignedByte" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>


As you can see, the second schema extends the first one for adding some new child to entry element. At this point, I have found some issues:




  1. If an extended element is typed incorrectly (for example, gere instead of genre) the validator does not give any error. I know that this is because of having lax as the value of processContents attribute of all the any elements, but I'm not supposed to change contacts.xsd schema. So, can I bypass this behavior somehow?


  2. Can I control somehow where are the extended elements added? Because if I add the personal-info element as a child of agenda the validator says that the document is valid, and I want to let only appear that element as a child of entry.



Note: I cannot use XSD 1.1 version



Thanks in advance










share|improve this question



























    0














    I have an application that tries to validate the following XML:



    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <cnt:agenda xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
    xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ppp:contactsv2 contactsv2.xsd urn:ppp:contacts contacts.xsd ">
    <cnt:entry>
    <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
    </cnt:entry>
    <cnt:entry>
    <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
    <cnt2:personal-info>
    <cnt2:genre>male</cnt2:genre>
    <cnt2:age>30</cnt2:age>
    </cnt2:personal-info>
    </cnt:entry>
    </cnt:agenda>


    In order to fulfill that, I have these two XSD schemas:



    contacts.xsd



    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xs:schema
    targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contacts"
    xmlns="urn:ppp:contacts"
    xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

    <xs:element name="agenda">
    <xs:complexType>
    <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
    <xs:element name="entry" type="entry-type"/>
    <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
    </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
    </xs:element>

    <xs:complexType name="entry-type">
    <xs:sequence>
    <xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
    <xs:element name="number" type="xs:string"/>
    <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
    </xs:sequence>
    <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
    </xs:complexType>
    </xs:schema>


    and contactsv2.xsd



    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
    xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
    xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
    elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

    <xs:import namespace="urn:ppp:contacts" schemaLocation="contacts.xsd"/>

    <!-- Child of entry element -->
    <xs:element name="personal-info"
    type="cnt2:personal-infoType" />

    <xs:complexType name="personal-infoType">
    <xs:sequence>
    <xs:element name="genre"
    type="xs:string" />
    <xs:element name="age" type="xs:unsignedByte" minOccurs="0"/>
    </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
    </xs:schema>


    As you can see, the second schema extends the first one for adding some new child to entry element. At this point, I have found some issues:




    1. If an extended element is typed incorrectly (for example, gere instead of genre) the validator does not give any error. I know that this is because of having lax as the value of processContents attribute of all the any elements, but I'm not supposed to change contacts.xsd schema. So, can I bypass this behavior somehow?


    2. Can I control somehow where are the extended elements added? Because if I add the personal-info element as a child of agenda the validator says that the document is valid, and I want to let only appear that element as a child of entry.



    Note: I cannot use XSD 1.1 version



    Thanks in advance










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I have an application that tries to validate the following XML:



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <cnt:agenda xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
      xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ppp:contactsv2 contactsv2.xsd urn:ppp:contacts contacts.xsd ">
      <cnt:entry>
      <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
      </cnt:entry>
      <cnt:entry>
      <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
      <cnt2:personal-info>
      <cnt2:genre>male</cnt2:genre>
      <cnt2:age>30</cnt2:age>
      </cnt2:personal-info>
      </cnt:entry>
      </cnt:agenda>


      In order to fulfill that, I have these two XSD schemas:



      contacts.xsd



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <xs:schema
      targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

      <xs:element name="agenda">
      <xs:complexType>
      <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
      <xs:element name="entry" type="entry-type"/>
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:element>

      <xs:complexType name="entry-type">
      <xs:sequence>
      <xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
      <xs:element name="number" type="xs:string"/>
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:schema>


      and contactsv2.xsd



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
      elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

      <xs:import namespace="urn:ppp:contacts" schemaLocation="contacts.xsd"/>

      <!-- Child of entry element -->
      <xs:element name="personal-info"
      type="cnt2:personal-infoType" />

      <xs:complexType name="personal-infoType">
      <xs:sequence>
      <xs:element name="genre"
      type="xs:string" />
      <xs:element name="age" type="xs:unsignedByte" minOccurs="0"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:schema>


      As you can see, the second schema extends the first one for adding some new child to entry element. At this point, I have found some issues:




      1. If an extended element is typed incorrectly (for example, gere instead of genre) the validator does not give any error. I know that this is because of having lax as the value of processContents attribute of all the any elements, but I'm not supposed to change contacts.xsd schema. So, can I bypass this behavior somehow?


      2. Can I control somehow where are the extended elements added? Because if I add the personal-info element as a child of agenda the validator says that the document is valid, and I want to let only appear that element as a child of entry.



      Note: I cannot use XSD 1.1 version



      Thanks in advance










      share|improve this question













      I have an application that tries to validate the following XML:



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <cnt:agenda xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
      xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ppp:contactsv2 contactsv2.xsd urn:ppp:contacts contacts.xsd ">
      <cnt:entry>
      <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
      </cnt:entry>
      <cnt:entry>
      <cnt:number>12345678</cnt:number>
      <cnt2:personal-info>
      <cnt2:genre>male</cnt2:genre>
      <cnt2:age>30</cnt2:age>
      </cnt2:personal-info>
      </cnt:entry>
      </cnt:agenda>


      In order to fulfill that, I have these two XSD schemas:



      contacts.xsd



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <xs:schema
      targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns="urn:ppp:contacts"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

      <xs:element name="agenda">
      <xs:complexType>
      <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
      <xs:element name="entry" type="entry-type"/>
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:element>

      <xs:complexType name="entry-type">
      <xs:sequence>
      <xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
      <xs:element name="number" type="xs:string"/>
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:schema>


      and contactsv2.xsd



      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      xmlns:cnt2="urn:ppp:contactsv2"
      xmlns:cnt="urn:ppp:contacts"
      elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

      <xs:import namespace="urn:ppp:contacts" schemaLocation="contacts.xsd"/>

      <!-- Child of entry element -->
      <xs:element name="personal-info"
      type="cnt2:personal-infoType" />

      <xs:complexType name="personal-infoType">
      <xs:sequence>
      <xs:element name="genre"
      type="xs:string" />
      <xs:element name="age" type="xs:unsignedByte" minOccurs="0"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      </xs:schema>


      As you can see, the second schema extends the first one for adding some new child to entry element. At this point, I have found some issues:




      1. If an extended element is typed incorrectly (for example, gere instead of genre) the validator does not give any error. I know that this is because of having lax as the value of processContents attribute of all the any elements, but I'm not supposed to change contacts.xsd schema. So, can I bypass this behavior somehow?


      2. Can I control somehow where are the extended elements added? Because if I add the personal-info element as a child of agenda the validator says that the document is valid, and I want to let only appear that element as a child of entry.



      Note: I cannot use XSD 1.1 version



      Thanks in advance







      xml xsd xml-validation






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 at 19:43









      Jon Ander

      13




      13
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I'm not sure whether "no" counts as an answer, but I don't think there is an easy solution to either problem. You could try modifying the given schema without really modifying it by using xs:redefine, but personally I hate that feature, and find it far preferable to modify the supplied schema as a source document (perhaps controlling the process by making the modifications repeatable, via an XSLT stylesheet).






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53437243%2fissues-extending-an-xsd-schema-with-any-elements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            I'm not sure whether "no" counts as an answer, but I don't think there is an easy solution to either problem. You could try modifying the given schema without really modifying it by using xs:redefine, but personally I hate that feature, and find it far preferable to modify the supplied schema as a source document (perhaps controlling the process by making the modifications repeatable, via an XSLT stylesheet).






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              I'm not sure whether "no" counts as an answer, but I don't think there is an easy solution to either problem. You could try modifying the given schema without really modifying it by using xs:redefine, but personally I hate that feature, and find it far preferable to modify the supplied schema as a source document (perhaps controlling the process by making the modifications repeatable, via an XSLT stylesheet).






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                I'm not sure whether "no" counts as an answer, but I don't think there is an easy solution to either problem. You could try modifying the given schema without really modifying it by using xs:redefine, but personally I hate that feature, and find it far preferable to modify the supplied schema as a source document (perhaps controlling the process by making the modifications repeatable, via an XSLT stylesheet).






                share|improve this answer












                I'm not sure whether "no" counts as an answer, but I don't think there is an easy solution to either problem. You could try modifying the given schema without really modifying it by using xs:redefine, but personally I hate that feature, and find it far preferable to modify the supplied schema as a source document (perhaps controlling the process by making the modifications repeatable, via an XSLT stylesheet).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 at 23:29









                Michael Kay

                108k659114




                108k659114






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53437243%2fissues-extending-an-xsd-schema-with-any-elements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

                    Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

                    Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)