How could a planet have a sky without stars at night?
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
I'm looking for some kind of natural phenomena that would hide the stars, but allow the sun to rise and fall as normal. The atmosphere and day/night cycles should be unaffected.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
This can be a solar system with only one planet.
space astronomy solar-system galactic
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
I'm looking for some kind of natural phenomena that would hide the stars, but allow the sun to rise and fall as normal. The atmosphere and day/night cycles should be unaffected.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
This can be a solar system with only one planet.
space astronomy solar-system galactic
3
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
2
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
I'm looking for some kind of natural phenomena that would hide the stars, but allow the sun to rise and fall as normal. The atmosphere and day/night cycles should be unaffected.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
This can be a solar system with only one planet.
space astronomy solar-system galactic
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
I'm looking for some kind of natural phenomena that would hide the stars, but allow the sun to rise and fall as normal. The atmosphere and day/night cycles should be unaffected.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
This can be a solar system with only one planet.
space astronomy solar-system galactic
space astronomy solar-system galactic
edited 4 hours ago
JBH
40.1k589192
40.1k589192
asked 4 hours ago
cgTag
1,155214
1,155214
3
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
2
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
2
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago
3
3
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
2
2
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago
add a comment |
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
Dust cloud.
The star may be residing in a dust cloud with no other stars nearby. This interstellar dust will create a faint nighttime glow, and can be thick enough that no other star's light can be visible on the planet.
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Perhaps their planet is on the inside of a giant Dyson sphere that was created by an ancient civilization.
This would be a vast solid shell that surrounds their entire solar system, the inside of which is covered with solar panels in order to collect as near as possible to 100% of the energy output of their sun. Naturally, this would block their view of the rest of the galaxy as well.
As for why the ancient civilization who built it left this one planet on the inside, that's up to you to decide. Maybe they saw that it had some life forms that might potentially develop intelligence some day and didn't want to just kill them off, so they left them where they were, while dismantling all the rest of the planets in the system to build the spere?
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
add a comment |
One possibility is for the surface of the planet to be covered in highly luminous matter. Perhaps all the surface is an interconnected network of bioluminescent life.
There is no moon (assumed because you make no mention) and the high levels of light pollution at night will blot the stars out.
You could combine with a naturally hazy atmosphere and cloud cover to a) further blot the stars and b) reflect all that light pollution back to the surface, further brightening it at night.
Normal urban terrestrial light pollution (before and during the great 2003 Northeast Blackout) to give you an idea:

Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
there are many ways. especially if it's just you don't see the stars.
there could be a constant storm like on Jupiter and in 'All Summer In a Day' by Ray Bradbury.
Venus has an atmosphere made up mainly of carbon dioxide, and thick clouds of sulfuric acid completely cover the planet.
basically, clouds covering the entire planet would do the trick.
'light pollution' would also make it so the stars can't be seen because the ground is so bright.
Night Sky in Las Vegas Which is always full of light especially at night

vs the Idaho dark sky preserve

add a comment |
The sun takes up about half a degree in Earth's sky. Stars are less than one ten thousandths of that. If atmospheric blurring were to blur a star one hundredth of a degree, their light would be spread over an area hundreds of times larger, making them practically invisible, while the effect on the sun will be minuscule.
add a comment |
It is never night.

https://www.tripsavvy.com/midnight-sun-in-scandinavia-1626397
Your people live on the north pole of a tidally locked planet. Like the countries near the north pole on our planet, in summer the sun never sets. It is always summer for your people.
Why do they only live near the pole? Maybe it is hot farther south. Maybe there are scratchy monsters. Maybe there is no land to live on.
Maybe they are afraid of the dark.
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
add a comment |
The laziest answer is to just wait a while. If you wait an incomprehensibly-long while, eventually the expansion of the universe will move all currently near-by light generating bodies outside of our visual distance.
In other words, civilizations in the far-future may never realize that anything other than their own sun exists, because nothing else is close enough to interact with anymore. This video has a nice overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg4vb-KH5F4
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
add a comment |
It's part of a rogue solar system ejected from any galaxy, somewhere in the middle of a large intergalactic void.
No stars would be visible until the inhabitants developed sufficiently powerful telescopes to be able to see the faint light of distant galaxies.
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
It depends on what you mean by "our part" of the galaxy. If you point yourself in the direction of Sagittarius and travel a mere 2600 light years you will find yourself smack in the middle of the Great Rift, which is the dark patch you see covering the Milky Way.
https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/the-great-rift-in-the-milky-way
This is an area where new stars are formed, but obviously the dust is thick enough that we cannot see through it in the visible spectrum. It seems plausible that there could be star systems in that large area where the dust is thick enough that no other star is visible.
Note that the "thick" dust is by Earth surface standards extremely dilute and would be considered a high-quality vacuum. It's only the fact that there are light years of the stuff that make it hard to see through.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
You might wish to research how the "space cloud" and "planet that doesn't know about space" tropes have been done before. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpaceClouds and https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Krikkit may be useful.
add a comment |
The sun is a star, but I know what you mean. Here are some other options:
- Multiple suns (such as Asimov's "Nightfall")
- One sun, and many moons
- Large amounts of very white (or reflective) dust, which reflects sunlight around the atmosphere.
- Underground or underwater societies.
- Regular volcanic eruptions causing volcanic ash in the atmosphere (or anything else in the atmosphere)
- Monsters that come out at sunset
- taboo/superstition/religion
- Your planet might be near a black hole, causing gravitational lensing, an accretion disk, unusually high speed orbits, and jets coming from the poles.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135411%2fhow-could-a-planet-have-a-sky-without-stars-at-night%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dust cloud.
The star may be residing in a dust cloud with no other stars nearby. This interstellar dust will create a faint nighttime glow, and can be thick enough that no other star's light can be visible on the planet.
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Dust cloud.
The star may be residing in a dust cloud with no other stars nearby. This interstellar dust will create a faint nighttime glow, and can be thick enough that no other star's light can be visible on the planet.
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Dust cloud.
The star may be residing in a dust cloud with no other stars nearby. This interstellar dust will create a faint nighttime glow, and can be thick enough that no other star's light can be visible on the planet.
Dust cloud.
The star may be residing in a dust cloud with no other stars nearby. This interstellar dust will create a faint nighttime glow, and can be thick enough that no other star's light can be visible on the planet.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 3 hours ago
Alexander
18.8k42973
18.8k42973
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
add a comment |
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
An answer that Hactar would be proud of
– Chronocidal
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Perhaps their planet is on the inside of a giant Dyson sphere that was created by an ancient civilization.
This would be a vast solid shell that surrounds their entire solar system, the inside of which is covered with solar panels in order to collect as near as possible to 100% of the energy output of their sun. Naturally, this would block their view of the rest of the galaxy as well.
As for why the ancient civilization who built it left this one planet on the inside, that's up to you to decide. Maybe they saw that it had some life forms that might potentially develop intelligence some day and didn't want to just kill them off, so they left them where they were, while dismantling all the rest of the planets in the system to build the spere?
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Perhaps their planet is on the inside of a giant Dyson sphere that was created by an ancient civilization.
This would be a vast solid shell that surrounds their entire solar system, the inside of which is covered with solar panels in order to collect as near as possible to 100% of the energy output of their sun. Naturally, this would block their view of the rest of the galaxy as well.
As for why the ancient civilization who built it left this one planet on the inside, that's up to you to decide. Maybe they saw that it had some life forms that might potentially develop intelligence some day and didn't want to just kill them off, so they left them where they were, while dismantling all the rest of the planets in the system to build the spere?
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Perhaps their planet is on the inside of a giant Dyson sphere that was created by an ancient civilization.
This would be a vast solid shell that surrounds their entire solar system, the inside of which is covered with solar panels in order to collect as near as possible to 100% of the energy output of their sun. Naturally, this would block their view of the rest of the galaxy as well.
As for why the ancient civilization who built it left this one planet on the inside, that's up to you to decide. Maybe they saw that it had some life forms that might potentially develop intelligence some day and didn't want to just kill them off, so they left them where they were, while dismantling all the rest of the planets in the system to build the spere?
Perhaps their planet is on the inside of a giant Dyson sphere that was created by an ancient civilization.
This would be a vast solid shell that surrounds their entire solar system, the inside of which is covered with solar panels in order to collect as near as possible to 100% of the energy output of their sun. Naturally, this would block their view of the rest of the galaxy as well.
As for why the ancient civilization who built it left this one planet on the inside, that's up to you to decide. Maybe they saw that it had some life forms that might potentially develop intelligence some day and didn't want to just kill them off, so they left them where they were, while dismantling all the rest of the planets in the system to build the spere?
answered 4 hours ago
Admiral Jota
510111
510111
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
1
1
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
Paint the inner surface matte black and you have a winner. It's not a natural phenomena, but a decent alternative. Well done!
– JBH
4 hours ago
2
2
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
For the (relatively) primitive people on the planet, it is a natural phenomenon! It's literally the edge of the universe!
– elemtilas
3 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
You don't have to paint the surface of the dyson sphere black if it has 100% (or even 99%+) efficient solar panels on it, since very little of the light would be reflected.
– ltmauve
2 hours ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
If they showed movies on the inside of the shell, that would work just as well and you could see movies. They would need to be filmed with that special IMAX camera though.
– Willk
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
The solid shell would need a way to dissipate the heat produced by the star. Otherwise it would get very toasty inside.
– n0rd
1 hour ago
add a comment |
One possibility is for the surface of the planet to be covered in highly luminous matter. Perhaps all the surface is an interconnected network of bioluminescent life.
There is no moon (assumed because you make no mention) and the high levels of light pollution at night will blot the stars out.
You could combine with a naturally hazy atmosphere and cloud cover to a) further blot the stars and b) reflect all that light pollution back to the surface, further brightening it at night.
Normal urban terrestrial light pollution (before and during the great 2003 Northeast Blackout) to give you an idea:

Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
One possibility is for the surface of the planet to be covered in highly luminous matter. Perhaps all the surface is an interconnected network of bioluminescent life.
There is no moon (assumed because you make no mention) and the high levels of light pollution at night will blot the stars out.
You could combine with a naturally hazy atmosphere and cloud cover to a) further blot the stars and b) reflect all that light pollution back to the surface, further brightening it at night.
Normal urban terrestrial light pollution (before and during the great 2003 Northeast Blackout) to give you an idea:

Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
One possibility is for the surface of the planet to be covered in highly luminous matter. Perhaps all the surface is an interconnected network of bioluminescent life.
There is no moon (assumed because you make no mention) and the high levels of light pollution at night will blot the stars out.
You could combine with a naturally hazy atmosphere and cloud cover to a) further blot the stars and b) reflect all that light pollution back to the surface, further brightening it at night.
Normal urban terrestrial light pollution (before and during the great 2003 Northeast Blackout) to give you an idea:

One possibility is for the surface of the planet to be covered in highly luminous matter. Perhaps all the surface is an interconnected network of bioluminescent life.
There is no moon (assumed because you make no mention) and the high levels of light pollution at night will blot the stars out.
You could combine with a naturally hazy atmosphere and cloud cover to a) further blot the stars and b) reflect all that light pollution back to the surface, further brightening it at night.
Normal urban terrestrial light pollution (before and during the great 2003 Northeast Blackout) to give you an idea:

edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
elemtilas
11k22554
11k22554
Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
Interesting, but in order to have light pollution we need a source of light. Moonless starless sky implies that such source must be elsewhere.
– Alexander
3 hours ago
1
1
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Alexander I believe that's why bioluminescent life was mentioned.
– Andon
2 hours ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Andon bioluminescent life needs to be spread quite universally, leaving no big gaps at polar regions, deserts, mountain regions etc.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@Alexander -- exactly as I said...
– elemtilas
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
@elemtilas For light pollution to bleed 100-200 km away, the atmosphere needs to be so hazy that sun can not be seen "to rise and fall as normal". Day/night cycle will be definitely affected.
– Alexander
1 hour ago
|
show 2 more comments
there are many ways. especially if it's just you don't see the stars.
there could be a constant storm like on Jupiter and in 'All Summer In a Day' by Ray Bradbury.
Venus has an atmosphere made up mainly of carbon dioxide, and thick clouds of sulfuric acid completely cover the planet.
basically, clouds covering the entire planet would do the trick.
'light pollution' would also make it so the stars can't be seen because the ground is so bright.
Night Sky in Las Vegas Which is always full of light especially at night

vs the Idaho dark sky preserve

add a comment |
there are many ways. especially if it's just you don't see the stars.
there could be a constant storm like on Jupiter and in 'All Summer In a Day' by Ray Bradbury.
Venus has an atmosphere made up mainly of carbon dioxide, and thick clouds of sulfuric acid completely cover the planet.
basically, clouds covering the entire planet would do the trick.
'light pollution' would also make it so the stars can't be seen because the ground is so bright.
Night Sky in Las Vegas Which is always full of light especially at night

vs the Idaho dark sky preserve

add a comment |
there are many ways. especially if it's just you don't see the stars.
there could be a constant storm like on Jupiter and in 'All Summer In a Day' by Ray Bradbury.
Venus has an atmosphere made up mainly of carbon dioxide, and thick clouds of sulfuric acid completely cover the planet.
basically, clouds covering the entire planet would do the trick.
'light pollution' would also make it so the stars can't be seen because the ground is so bright.
Night Sky in Las Vegas Which is always full of light especially at night

vs the Idaho dark sky preserve

there are many ways. especially if it's just you don't see the stars.
there could be a constant storm like on Jupiter and in 'All Summer In a Day' by Ray Bradbury.
Venus has an atmosphere made up mainly of carbon dioxide, and thick clouds of sulfuric acid completely cover the planet.
basically, clouds covering the entire planet would do the trick.
'light pollution' would also make it so the stars can't be seen because the ground is so bright.
Night Sky in Las Vegas Which is always full of light especially at night

vs the Idaho dark sky preserve

answered 3 hours ago
Rowyn Alloway
4411213
4411213
add a comment |
add a comment |
The sun takes up about half a degree in Earth's sky. Stars are less than one ten thousandths of that. If atmospheric blurring were to blur a star one hundredth of a degree, their light would be spread over an area hundreds of times larger, making them practically invisible, while the effect on the sun will be minuscule.
add a comment |
The sun takes up about half a degree in Earth's sky. Stars are less than one ten thousandths of that. If atmospheric blurring were to blur a star one hundredth of a degree, their light would be spread over an area hundreds of times larger, making them practically invisible, while the effect on the sun will be minuscule.
add a comment |
The sun takes up about half a degree in Earth's sky. Stars are less than one ten thousandths of that. If atmospheric blurring were to blur a star one hundredth of a degree, their light would be spread over an area hundreds of times larger, making them practically invisible, while the effect on the sun will be minuscule.
The sun takes up about half a degree in Earth's sky. Stars are less than one ten thousandths of that. If atmospheric blurring were to blur a star one hundredth of a degree, their light would be spread over an area hundreds of times larger, making them practically invisible, while the effect on the sun will be minuscule.
answered 2 hours ago
Acccumulation
32014
32014
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is never night.

https://www.tripsavvy.com/midnight-sun-in-scandinavia-1626397
Your people live on the north pole of a tidally locked planet. Like the countries near the north pole on our planet, in summer the sun never sets. It is always summer for your people.
Why do they only live near the pole? Maybe it is hot farther south. Maybe there are scratchy monsters. Maybe there is no land to live on.
Maybe they are afraid of the dark.
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
add a comment |
It is never night.

https://www.tripsavvy.com/midnight-sun-in-scandinavia-1626397
Your people live on the north pole of a tidally locked planet. Like the countries near the north pole on our planet, in summer the sun never sets. It is always summer for your people.
Why do they only live near the pole? Maybe it is hot farther south. Maybe there are scratchy monsters. Maybe there is no land to live on.
Maybe they are afraid of the dark.
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
add a comment |
It is never night.

https://www.tripsavvy.com/midnight-sun-in-scandinavia-1626397
Your people live on the north pole of a tidally locked planet. Like the countries near the north pole on our planet, in summer the sun never sets. It is always summer for your people.
Why do they only live near the pole? Maybe it is hot farther south. Maybe there are scratchy monsters. Maybe there is no land to live on.
Maybe they are afraid of the dark.
It is never night.

https://www.tripsavvy.com/midnight-sun-in-scandinavia-1626397
Your people live on the north pole of a tidally locked planet. Like the countries near the north pole on our planet, in summer the sun never sets. It is always summer for your people.
Why do they only live near the pole? Maybe it is hot farther south. Maybe there are scratchy monsters. Maybe there is no land to live on.
Maybe they are afraid of the dark.
answered 2 hours ago
Willk
102k25195426
102k25195426
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
add a comment |
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
Even better: a planet orbits the barycenter of a binary system within the binary's orbit, each face of the planet illuminated.
– B.fox
31 mins ago
add a comment |
The laziest answer is to just wait a while. If you wait an incomprehensibly-long while, eventually the expansion of the universe will move all currently near-by light generating bodies outside of our visual distance.
In other words, civilizations in the far-future may never realize that anything other than their own sun exists, because nothing else is close enough to interact with anymore. This video has a nice overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg4vb-KH5F4
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
add a comment |
The laziest answer is to just wait a while. If you wait an incomprehensibly-long while, eventually the expansion of the universe will move all currently near-by light generating bodies outside of our visual distance.
In other words, civilizations in the far-future may never realize that anything other than their own sun exists, because nothing else is close enough to interact with anymore. This video has a nice overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg4vb-KH5F4
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
add a comment |
The laziest answer is to just wait a while. If you wait an incomprehensibly-long while, eventually the expansion of the universe will move all currently near-by light generating bodies outside of our visual distance.
In other words, civilizations in the far-future may never realize that anything other than their own sun exists, because nothing else is close enough to interact with anymore. This video has a nice overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg4vb-KH5F4
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The laziest answer is to just wait a while. If you wait an incomprehensibly-long while, eventually the expansion of the universe will move all currently near-by light generating bodies outside of our visual distance.
In other words, civilizations in the far-future may never realize that anything other than their own sun exists, because nothing else is close enough to interact with anymore. This video has a nice overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg4vb-KH5F4
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 47 mins ago
Nick
411
411
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Nick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
add a comment |
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
:D equating "a while" with "incomprehensibly long while" Good answer though.
– AMADANON Inc.
38 mins ago
add a comment |
It's part of a rogue solar system ejected from any galaxy, somewhere in the middle of a large intergalactic void.
No stars would be visible until the inhabitants developed sufficiently powerful telescopes to be able to see the faint light of distant galaxies.
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's part of a rogue solar system ejected from any galaxy, somewhere in the middle of a large intergalactic void.
No stars would be visible until the inhabitants developed sufficiently powerful telescopes to be able to see the faint light of distant galaxies.
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's part of a rogue solar system ejected from any galaxy, somewhere in the middle of a large intergalactic void.
No stars would be visible until the inhabitants developed sufficiently powerful telescopes to be able to see the faint light of distant galaxies.
It's part of a rogue solar system ejected from any galaxy, somewhere in the middle of a large intergalactic void.
No stars would be visible until the inhabitants developed sufficiently powerful telescopes to be able to see the faint light of distant galaxies.
answered 1 hour ago
Logan R. Kearsley
9,81312949
9,81312949
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
The question asks for "A planet in our part of the galaxy"
– Andon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
It depends on what you mean by "our part" of the galaxy. If you point yourself in the direction of Sagittarius and travel a mere 2600 light years you will find yourself smack in the middle of the Great Rift, which is the dark patch you see covering the Milky Way.
https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/the-great-rift-in-the-milky-way
This is an area where new stars are formed, but obviously the dust is thick enough that we cannot see through it in the visible spectrum. It seems plausible that there could be star systems in that large area where the dust is thick enough that no other star is visible.
Note that the "thick" dust is by Earth surface standards extremely dilute and would be considered a high-quality vacuum. It's only the fact that there are light years of the stuff that make it hard to see through.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
You might wish to research how the "space cloud" and "planet that doesn't know about space" tropes have been done before. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpaceClouds and https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Krikkit may be useful.
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
It depends on what you mean by "our part" of the galaxy. If you point yourself in the direction of Sagittarius and travel a mere 2600 light years you will find yourself smack in the middle of the Great Rift, which is the dark patch you see covering the Milky Way.
https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/the-great-rift-in-the-milky-way
This is an area where new stars are formed, but obviously the dust is thick enough that we cannot see through it in the visible spectrum. It seems plausible that there could be star systems in that large area where the dust is thick enough that no other star is visible.
Note that the "thick" dust is by Earth surface standards extremely dilute and would be considered a high-quality vacuum. It's only the fact that there are light years of the stuff that make it hard to see through.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
You might wish to research how the "space cloud" and "planet that doesn't know about space" tropes have been done before. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpaceClouds and https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Krikkit may be useful.
add a comment |
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
It depends on what you mean by "our part" of the galaxy. If you point yourself in the direction of Sagittarius and travel a mere 2600 light years you will find yourself smack in the middle of the Great Rift, which is the dark patch you see covering the Milky Way.
https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/the-great-rift-in-the-milky-way
This is an area where new stars are formed, but obviously the dust is thick enough that we cannot see through it in the visible spectrum. It seems plausible that there could be star systems in that large area where the dust is thick enough that no other star is visible.
Note that the "thick" dust is by Earth surface standards extremely dilute and would be considered a high-quality vacuum. It's only the fact that there are light years of the stuff that make it hard to see through.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
You might wish to research how the "space cloud" and "planet that doesn't know about space" tropes have been done before. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpaceClouds and https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Krikkit may be useful.
Is it possible for a planet in our part of the galaxy to have a night without stars?
It depends on what you mean by "our part" of the galaxy. If you point yourself in the direction of Sagittarius and travel a mere 2600 light years you will find yourself smack in the middle of the Great Rift, which is the dark patch you see covering the Milky Way.
https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/the-great-rift-in-the-milky-way
This is an area where new stars are formed, but obviously the dust is thick enough that we cannot see through it in the visible spectrum. It seems plausible that there could be star systems in that large area where the dust is thick enough that no other star is visible.
Note that the "thick" dust is by Earth surface standards extremely dilute and would be considered a high-quality vacuum. It's only the fact that there are light years of the stuff that make it hard to see through.
It is the basis for a society that develops into the modern age without an interest in outer space.
You might wish to research how the "space cloud" and "planet that doesn't know about space" tropes have been done before. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpaceClouds and https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Krikkit may be useful.
answered 16 mins ago
Eric Lippert
27115
27115
add a comment |
add a comment |
The sun is a star, but I know what you mean. Here are some other options:
- Multiple suns (such as Asimov's "Nightfall")
- One sun, and many moons
- Large amounts of very white (or reflective) dust, which reflects sunlight around the atmosphere.
- Underground or underwater societies.
- Regular volcanic eruptions causing volcanic ash in the atmosphere (or anything else in the atmosphere)
- Monsters that come out at sunset
- taboo/superstition/religion
- Your planet might be near a black hole, causing gravitational lensing, an accretion disk, unusually high speed orbits, and jets coming from the poles.
add a comment |
The sun is a star, but I know what you mean. Here are some other options:
- Multiple suns (such as Asimov's "Nightfall")
- One sun, and many moons
- Large amounts of very white (or reflective) dust, which reflects sunlight around the atmosphere.
- Underground or underwater societies.
- Regular volcanic eruptions causing volcanic ash in the atmosphere (or anything else in the atmosphere)
- Monsters that come out at sunset
- taboo/superstition/religion
- Your planet might be near a black hole, causing gravitational lensing, an accretion disk, unusually high speed orbits, and jets coming from the poles.
add a comment |
The sun is a star, but I know what you mean. Here are some other options:
- Multiple suns (such as Asimov's "Nightfall")
- One sun, and many moons
- Large amounts of very white (or reflective) dust, which reflects sunlight around the atmosphere.
- Underground or underwater societies.
- Regular volcanic eruptions causing volcanic ash in the atmosphere (or anything else in the atmosphere)
- Monsters that come out at sunset
- taboo/superstition/religion
- Your planet might be near a black hole, causing gravitational lensing, an accretion disk, unusually high speed orbits, and jets coming from the poles.
The sun is a star, but I know what you mean. Here are some other options:
- Multiple suns (such as Asimov's "Nightfall")
- One sun, and many moons
- Large amounts of very white (or reflective) dust, which reflects sunlight around the atmosphere.
- Underground or underwater societies.
- Regular volcanic eruptions causing volcanic ash in the atmosphere (or anything else in the atmosphere)
- Monsters that come out at sunset
- taboo/superstition/religion
- Your planet might be near a black hole, causing gravitational lensing, an accretion disk, unusually high speed orbits, and jets coming from the poles.
answered 16 mins ago
AMADANON Inc.
1,08138
1,08138
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135411%2fhow-could-a-planet-have-a-sky-without-stars-at-night%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
No stars. No moon (I assume). You always have a sun. You'll have clouds. No asteroids? No meteors? I'm not convinced you can create the basis you're looking for. IMO, intelligent primates will always look at birds and want to fly, and they'll always want to fly higher, and God is almost always up where the sun is.... I'm not feeling this one.
– JBH
4 hours ago
Do a Hollow Earth fits your needs?
– kikirex
2 hours ago
2
I live in Ireland. Normally the weather here does a pretty good job of hiding the stars. :-)
– StephenG
2 hours ago