the [attribute] TOken should be changed from [global attributes] to [attributes] without a namespace
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is about C# grammar sample of the Irony project.
The original grammar is found here: CSharpGrammar.cs.
This is my modified C# syntax, but the [attribute] non-terminal should be changed from [global attributes] to [attributes] without a namespace.
How can do it?
this.Root = compilation_unit;
compilation_unit.Rule = extern_alias_directives_opt
+ using_directives_opt
+ global_attributes_opt
+ namespace_member_declarations;
var global_attribute_target = new NonTerminal("global_attribute_target");
global_attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
global_attributes_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(global_attributes_opt, null, global_attribute_section);
global_attribute_section.Rule = PreferShiftHere()+ "[" + global_attribute_target + colon + attribute_list + comma_opt + "]";
attribute_target_specifier_opt.Rule = Empty | attribute_target + colon;
attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
attribute_arguments_par_opt.Rule = Empty | Lpar + attribute_arguments_opt + Rpar;
attribute_arguments_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(attribute_arguments_opt, comma, attr_arg);
attr_arg.Rule = identifier + "=" + expression | expression;
right
error
c# irony
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is about C# grammar sample of the Irony project.
The original grammar is found here: CSharpGrammar.cs.
This is my modified C# syntax, but the [attribute] non-terminal should be changed from [global attributes] to [attributes] without a namespace.
How can do it?
this.Root = compilation_unit;
compilation_unit.Rule = extern_alias_directives_opt
+ using_directives_opt
+ global_attributes_opt
+ namespace_member_declarations;
var global_attribute_target = new NonTerminal("global_attribute_target");
global_attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
global_attributes_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(global_attributes_opt, null, global_attribute_section);
global_attribute_section.Rule = PreferShiftHere()+ "[" + global_attribute_target + colon + attribute_list + comma_opt + "]";
attribute_target_specifier_opt.Rule = Empty | attribute_target + colon;
attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
attribute_arguments_par_opt.Rule = Empty | Lpar + attribute_arguments_opt + Rpar;
attribute_arguments_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(attribute_arguments_opt, comma, attr_arg);
attr_arg.Rule = identifier + "=" + expression | expression;
right
error
c# irony
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is about C# grammar sample of the Irony project.
The original grammar is found here: CSharpGrammar.cs.
This is my modified C# syntax, but the [attribute] non-terminal should be changed from [global attributes] to [attributes] without a namespace.
How can do it?
this.Root = compilation_unit;
compilation_unit.Rule = extern_alias_directives_opt
+ using_directives_opt
+ global_attributes_opt
+ namespace_member_declarations;
var global_attribute_target = new NonTerminal("global_attribute_target");
global_attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
global_attributes_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(global_attributes_opt, null, global_attribute_section);
global_attribute_section.Rule = PreferShiftHere()+ "[" + global_attribute_target + colon + attribute_list + comma_opt + "]";
attribute_target_specifier_opt.Rule = Empty | attribute_target + colon;
attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
attribute_arguments_par_opt.Rule = Empty | Lpar + attribute_arguments_opt + Rpar;
attribute_arguments_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(attribute_arguments_opt, comma, attr_arg);
attr_arg.Rule = identifier + "=" + expression | expression;
right
error
c# irony
This question is about C# grammar sample of the Irony project.
The original grammar is found here: CSharpGrammar.cs.
This is my modified C# syntax, but the [attribute] non-terminal should be changed from [global attributes] to [attributes] without a namespace.
How can do it?
this.Root = compilation_unit;
compilation_unit.Rule = extern_alias_directives_opt
+ using_directives_opt
+ global_attributes_opt
+ namespace_member_declarations;
var global_attribute_target = new NonTerminal("global_attribute_target");
global_attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
global_attributes_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(global_attributes_opt, null, global_attribute_section);
global_attribute_section.Rule = PreferShiftHere()+ "[" + global_attribute_target + colon + attribute_list + comma_opt + "]";
attribute_target_specifier_opt.Rule = Empty | attribute_target + colon;
attribute_target.Rule = ToTerm("field") | "event" | "method" | "param" | "property" | "return" | "type";
attribute_arguments_par_opt.Rule = Empty | Lpar + attribute_arguments_opt + Rpar;
attribute_arguments_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(attribute_arguments_opt, comma, attr_arg);
attr_arg.Rule = identifier + "=" + expression | expression;
right
error
c# irony
c# irony
edited Nov 22 at 2:27
yallie
529720
529720
asked Nov 20 at 13:09
fyindex
1
1
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10
add a comment |
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53393737%2fthe-attribute-token-should-be-changed-from-global-attributes-to-attributes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why distinguish between global_attributes and attributes? Their syntax is the same, so why not use single non-terminal for both of them?
– yallie
Nov 21 at 22:10